¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: members being removed
Amen! Cacky
By Cacky B · #12117 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Don't understand how I have the cart before the horse, here.? We may be wrangling with semantics, here, but the end result (whether we say the action is telling groups.io the list member doesn't want
By Patty Sliney · #12116 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
There is no groups.io staff to do what you want. I would rather have Mark doing technical things than documentation things. We in GMF can do the latter...if we're willing to. I hire others to do
By Bruce · #12115 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
This points out that some subscribers/members recognize that it is easier to unsubscribe by mis-marking Groups.io messages as SPAM, than to find and go through the unsubscribe process
By Michael Pavan · #12114 ·
Re: New to Groups.io #question
Thanks so very much everyone. You are wonderful!! I will read up and give it a go.? It sounds like it will be the best option for us. Wish me luck Humbly yours, Pamela
By Pamela Tatt · #12113 ·
Re: pay for group
Jim, Another thought occurred to me. If we were to start donating by upgrading One can choose the group transfer plan (Premium for one month). It doesn't include an automatic renewal each month so
By Shal Farley · #12112 ·
Re: pay for group
Received from Ellen at 9/28/2018 02:15 AM UTC: Another thought occurred to me. If we were to start donating by upgrading for a month then Mark's ability to project future income is lessened because he
By Jim Higgins <HigginsJ@...> · #12111 ·
Re: pay for group
Received from Anita L via Groups.Io at 9/28/2018 02:25 AM UTC: You can't absolutely compel them, but you can provide "incentive." If enough people continue to mark messages as spam they can lead an
By Jim Higgins <HigginsJ@...> · #12110 ·
Re: pay for group
Prices, along with features and functionality for each package can be found at /static/pricing . This is where I'd strongly encourage you to talk with a lawyer that specializes in
By toki · #12109 ·
Re: pay for group
... Implementing the code is trivial. Complying with the legal requirements to accept donations is fairly complex. As a for-profit, I doubt that it would be legally possible to accept donations
By toki · #12108 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
I have had some of my subscribers actively do this. They decided that they really didn't want any more group messages. Rather than bother figuring out how to unsub, a message was marked as spam, and
By Bruce · #12107 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Samuel, I think the best way to "educate" users about a problem such as this one I certainly agree with that, it is what Groups.io already attempts to do. That speaks directly to to Patty's issue. In
By Shal Farley · #12106 ·
Re: members being removed
I think perhaps the mail providers have become more aggressive classifying emails as spam. Today I started seeing replies to an email chain where I did not receive the first message, even though I was
By Tom Link · #12105 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Michael, My ¡®opt-out¡¯ button suggestion is to opt-out of receiving the regular Ah, that's better than what I thought you meant. Still, I'm concerned that those messages would themselves be
By Shal Farley · #12104 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Patty, Okay, for fear of getting stomped on, again, since I've been a vocal You still seem to have the cart before the horse: When the email service sends a report to Groups.io, they are *not* saying
By Shal Farley · #12103 ·
Pointer after moving files
I have noticed that when we do this: 1. Upload a file with notification to members. 2. Using the scissors icon, move the file. The link in the email becomes useless and just leads to the general files
By Glenn Glazer <glenn.glazer@...> · #12102 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
I like this approach, perhaps it could be the most workable and successful...
By Michael Pavan · #12101 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
<snip> My ¡®opt-out¡¯ button suggestion is to opt-out of receiving the regular Special Notices reminders of ¡°How and Why not to get 'Removed for SPAM¡¯" - it would not be mandatory to choose not
By Michael Pavan · #12100 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Well thought out and stated, especially a 7 day vs 3 day window. I respect Mark¡¯s mission to try to improve Groups.io¡¯s reputation with ISPs. I actually assumed it might be a new industry mandate
By Michael Pavan · #12099 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
I believe one source of information done well by Professionals (with non-computer savvy language help) is more efficient and likely to be more effective than 1000s of efforts of inconsistent quality.
By Michael Pavan · #12098 ·