开云体育

Regardless of the reason your member is asking the question, I'd simply answer it by saying "Yes - groups.io isn't an NNTP-based service," followed by your standard instructions to join.

Pete

...
EAG| Either the member is stuck in
| the 1990s and thinks that your
| group is a Usenet newsgroup,


OK, good joke... But I, p.e., still
use Usenet Newsgroups to this day.
It is an excellent option for really
fast data downloading from the internet.
:)


[ ] Rubens







.

开云体育

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 04:25 AM, RHSC Communications wrote:

I've emailed support, but so far we have not received an answer

Mark is on vacation until Feb 23, so that may be the delay, ? I believe he assigns highest priority to Enterprise groups though.? There are few, if any, Enterprise owners here, so our advice may be limited.

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.

On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 03:18:52 -0000, Howard Hoyt <Elecraft.KX@...> wrote:

Hi,
I just had a member ask: "Is there a way to sign up without a nntp server?"
Can someone help with this query?

Malcolm.

Hi everyone,

We are trying to move a large a number of emailing lists to Groups.io, and wanted to ask you:

• For the custom domain, what is the usual time needed for Groups.io to do the switch, once we change the Name Servers? Is this a few hours or a few days?
• Changing logo + homepage - Again, what is the usual time this takes, once we email all the files to support?

I've emailed support, but so far we have not received an answer, so any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Also, are there any other channels that we can use to reach support?

Thank you all!

On 21 Feb 2022 at 19:18, Howard Hoyt wrote:

I just had a member ask: "Is there a way to sign up without a nntp
server?" Can someone help with this query?

As far as I know, there is no way to sign up WITH an NNTP server.

These are email mailing lists, not Usenet newsgroups.

It may be possible to gate them from mail to news and vice versa (a
GoogleGroups does), but I don't know of anyone who does so.

The only ways to sign up are with email, with an e-mail reader, or with a web
browser by going to the web site.


--
Steve Hayes
E-mail: shayes@...
Blog:
Web:
Phone: 083-342-3563 or 012-333-6727
Fax: 086-548-2525

Hi,
I just had a member ask: "Is there a way to sign up without a nntp server?"
Can someone help with this query?

Thank you!
Howard Hoyt

Frances wrote:

But in fact, members can edit the database tables unless each database is further locked down.
Using my member-only email, I can edit table properties, add rows, edit rows and more.

If I edit permissions on the individual table (table properties) so that the only thing a member can do is view the table, it does stop editing except by moderators and table owner.

Thanks for looking into this Frances. Great work. Using a test membership in the group I own (a test membership with member-only status) I found the same. I could edit the table -- change the name, edit the description -- and edit/add rows.

Then using my owner's account I went to the page for the Database selected and opened the Edit Table Properties box at the top left of the page.? I discovered the "Edit Table," "Add Rows" and "Edit Rows" were all set to "Members."? (Remember, in "Settings," the Database is set to "Members can view, moderators can create tables.") I then changed the settings to the most restrictive: I changed the "Edit Table" and "Add Rows" to "Moderator and Table Owner,"? I set "Edit Rows" to "Moderator, Table Owner and the Row Owner." After saving the "update" I revisited with my member-only account. Then there was only one option and that was to export the table in JSON format or CSV format.

I agree, IF this is the way it is supposed to work then the Owner's Manual needs to be revised accordingly.

tommy0421

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 06:28 PM, Colin Brooks wrote:

Was supposed to send list owners a letter? I haven't seen anything.?

As Duane said, you really do need to read the GMF wiki entry previously cited.

The last change in pricing structure happened a year ago. And at each and every change, existing groups have been .

It's these grandfathered/legacy groups that provide an alternative access to features no longer available for new Basic groups.

In summary, there is no need to panic.

Regards,
Bruce

---

Check out the groups.io Help Center?and?groups.io Owners Manual

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:28 PM, Colin Brooks wrote:

Wait what?

Did you read the information at the link?? That should answer any questions.

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 03:16 PM, Mac Mckeever wrote:

What are the plans for these groups since the 100 member limit is being implemented?

It depends on when you created the groups, /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/25069

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 08:45 AM, SP4149 wrote:

Frances mentions the concept of repurposing Basic (Free, pre 2020) lists.? I see that as having considerably value compared to deletion.? New Basic lists
have dramatically reduced benefits.? Two are affecting current lists as well.. Photo Admin administration is gone for new lists, but that means there
is no enthusiasm for more tools to administrate photo directories.? When there is a need for tools to delete old photos.? (e.g. bulk deletions such as by photo album name, creation date, owner, etc...) are useful for most lists, just not Basic lists trying to stay under 1 GB free image storage. (etc.)

Ken -- Changing the subject line, since we're beginning to stray off-topic.

This is a common complaint for groups at all levels, and I believe many of us would like to see tools of this kind become available to us.

One list I joined encouraged storage of images by message instead of photo Album creation.? They now have 1GB of e-male images, cannot store in photo albums, and cannot do a bulk delete of old e-mail images.?

There is a "Storage Limit Reached" setting that will automatically delete old attachments to get this group back under quota.?/helpcenter/ownersmanual/1/customizing-group-settings/message-policy-settings?

Worse the e-mail photo albums contain multiples of images in replies to the first message.? While images in messages
can be prevented in settings as well as size; mistakes made cannot be later corrected.? How about a one time only resize of the e-mail photo album image to a smaller size, unlimited resized to 488 pixels could save some legacy lists.

This and other suggestions need to be posted to?. Groups.io management does not monitor GMF.?
?

Last year if upgraded, a Basic legacy list of nearly 2000 subscribers to Premium before a price increase would cost nearly $900,? It was clear that my list had become a major free loader getting a free service valued at current pricing at nearly $900.? we were only using 25% of the 1 GB image capacity.? The upgrade had no benefit to subscribers;?Long term it may make groups.io a litter stronger financially by one less free loader (etc).

I believe it's generally understood that the pricing structure implemented on August 24, 2020 may have created an underground economy in legacy-enabled Basic groups. Mark is no fool and I'm sure he figured all of that in when he made the change.?

Regards,
Bruce

---

Check out the groups.io Help Center?and?groups.io Owners Manual

Frances,
? Mentions the concept of repurposing Basic (Free, pre 2020) lists.? I see that as having considerably value compared to deletion.? New Basic lists
have dramatically reduced benefits.? Two are affecting current lists as well.. Photo Admin administration is gone for new lists, but that means there
is no enthusiasm for more tools to administrate photo directories.? When there is a need for tools to delete old photos.? (e.g. bulk deletions such as by photo album
name, creation date, owner, etc...) are useful for most lists, just not Basic lists trying to stay under 1 GB free image storage.

One list I joined encouraged storage of images by message instead of photo Album creation.? They now have 1GB of e-male images, cannot store in photo albums,
and cannot do a bulk delete of old e-mail images.? Worse the e-mail photo albums contain multiples of images in replies to the first message.? While images in messages
can be prevented in settings as well as size; mistakes made cannot be later corrected.? How about a one time only resize of the e-mail photo album image to a smaller size,
unlimited resized to 488 pixels could save some legacy lists.

Last year if upgraded, a Basic legacy list of nearly 2000 subscribers to Premium before a price increase would cost nearly $900,? It was clear that my list had become a major free loader
getting a free service valued at current pricing at nearly $900.? we were only using 25% of the 1 GB image capacity.? The upgrade had no benefit to subscribers;?
Long term it may make groups.io a litter stronger financially by one less free loader

I belong to a similar size list that did not control message images and now can no longer store in personal photo albums.? Upgrade to $900/a year premium status is a non-starter,
but repurposing an idle list would allow creation of a shadow list with image size and storage limitations, in effect a new start for free.

ken clark
--
ken clark

www.shastasprings.com

Thanks!? I just did repurpose for a new one I created today and I think i will park the other since it has extra bennies I didn't realize have been removed for new groups