Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- GroupManagersForum
- Messages
Search
Re: Moderators removed for spam
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 10:21 AM, Mark Murphy wrote:
In the case of a single-owner group, could failure to use the reinstatement link result in a group without an owner?The FBL mechanism, as implemented by groups.io, does not remove the sole remaining Owner of a group.? In such a case there will be no notification sent and no reinstatement link. Bruce? Check out the new groups.io Help Center?and?groups.io Owners Manual |
Re: Moderators removed for spam
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 09:45 AM, Bruce Bowman wrote:
If the person clicks the reinstatement link in the "removed for marking as spam" notification, they are restored with privileges unchanged.Thank you, this is good to know.? I am concerned that an owner could be removed from a group "automatically" by a third party service. Yes, an owner can click on the reinstatement link in the notification. But there are some issues with that too:
Am I missing something? |
Re: Moderators removed for spam
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 09:37 AM, Mark Murphy wrote:
Could someone please clarify what, if anything, changes about a?member's status as a moderator or owner of a group, when a group moderator or owner is "removed" due to spam??If the person clicks the reinstatement link in the "removed for marking as spam" notification, they are restored with privileges unchanged. I have not tested what happens if they rejoin the group instead. Bruce Check out the new groups.io Help Center?and?groups.io Owners Manual |
Re: Photo Albums
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 09:36 AM, Mdivine wrote:
If you delete older photos or attachments or the system deletes.....is the person who posted them notified?Sometimes. See the Notifications section at?/g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/Deleting%20attachments,%20files%20and%20photos? Bruce Check out the new groups.io Help Center?and?groups.io Owners Manual |
Re: Moderators removed for spam
Your account is no longer listed among the active subscriptions, you no longer receive emails, and you cannot access Photos, Files, or any other online content in that group. You may be able to read messages online, but only if the group's message archive is public.Could someone please clarify what, if anything, changes about a?member's status as a moderator or owner of a group, when a group moderator or owner is "removed" due to spam?? Thank you. |
Re: SOMEBODY updated those darn old spam filters - again
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 3:48 PM Shal Farley <shals2nd@...> wrote: Larry, Thanks, Shal Here is the report for that IP. There are four RBLs that list it, but none of them are important ones that would affect most of the world: Larry Finch N 40¡ã 53' 50" W 74¡ã 02' 55" |
Re: Viewing Directory
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 08:20 AM, Steve wrote:
As the owner of a group, it seems I will always see all members in the directory.? Whereas group members can only see others if the correct permissions have been set.? Do I correctly understand that?Specifically:
Is there a way for me to view the directory the same way a member would view it?? Meaning only to see the members who have set their permissions to do so?The best way is to see the group as others do is to subscribe yourself to the group using a second email address; one that has only Member permissions. And of course, for the purpose of browsing the Directory you will also have to create a profile. Having done so, you will subsequently have to keep track of which address you're logged in under so as to avoid getting confused. See?/g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/Group-Content-Is-Missing Hope this helps, Bruce Check out the new groups.io Help Center?and?groups.io Owners Manual |
Re: Viewing Directory
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 07:20 AM, Steve wrote:
Is there a way for me to view the directory the same way a member would view it?The only way that I'm aware of is to create another account and make it a member of the group.? I do that on all groups I own anyway so I can be sure what a member will see vs an owner. Duane -- The official Groups.io user documentation is in the Groups.io Help Center. GMF's Unofficial Help Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki |
Viewing Directory
As the owner of a group, it seems I will always see all members in the directory.? Whereas group members can only see others if the correct permissions have been set.? Do I correctly understand that?
Is there a way for me to view the directory the same way a member would view it?? Meaning only to see the members who have set their permissions to do so? |
Re: treatment of gmail "reply" to a GIO message
Bruce, if I understand it correctly, when a group member replies to a message from GIO, that reply is queued for all members of the group, ... That depends on the group's settings, one of which is Reply To.
... because the GIO group is the "sender" of the message. Not for that reason. The From address is generally the member's address and that would normally control where an email Reply goes. However in groups that have their Reply To set to Group (which is the default) then Groups.io includes a Reply-To: field in the header of outbound messages directing replies to the group's posting address. Nearly all email interfaces will interpret that Reply-To field to override the From address. if a recipient wants to respond only to the OP, they must use the (blue) GIO reply to sender function. is there any optionality on this? If the group is a free, barter, or sale type of group, and customarily has postings such as your example, the group's Reply To can be set to Sender. This changes the default state of the Private button in the group's web page, and it also changes the way the Reply-To header field in outbound email messages is handled. This means that by default member's replies will go to the Sender regardless of whether they reply on the web site or by email.
Shal -- Help: /static/help More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list |
Re: treatment of gmail "reply" to a GIO message
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 06:11 AM, bruce hyman wrote:
if I understand it correctly, when a group member replies to a message from GIO, that reply is queued for all members of the group, because the GIO group is the "sender" of the message. if a recipient wants to respond only to the OP, they must use the (blue) GIO reply to sender function. is there any optionality on this?This is a typical scenario and it's not limited to Gmail.? In your given scenario, Carol can ignore the default reply and use the reply to sender link in the email footer. Another alternative we use is to have a #replytosender hashtag on the OP message (with the reply to sender option checked in the hashtag propteries) so that the default reply option in email clients sends a message to the OP rather than the group.? If you are the group owner (or a moderator with the right privileges) you can also change the topic to 'Override: reply to sender'. Andy |
Re: Moderators removed for spam
On 2020-05-03 at 4:54:25 PM, Bruce Bowman <bruce.bowman@...> wrote:
My experience does not bear this out. It seems to me that the FBLFor the particular situation processing a FBL report from a group's moderator or owner, it seems like a reasonable compromise would be to switch their membership in that one group to "no email". This way, they stay a member of the group but the spirit of the FBL remains in place--however poorly the current implementations are working. (E.g., Groups.io doesn't "get in trouble" with the providers for sending mail that isn't "wanted" until the user opts in again.) There's a hiccup if a group doesn't allow "no email": should the member be switched to "announcements only"? Should they be removed like happens today? Thoughts? -- Christopher W. <lists@...> |
treatment of gmail "reply" to a GIO message
if I understand it correctly, when a group member replies to a message from GIO, that reply is queued for all members of the group, because the GIO group is the "sender" of the message. if a recipient wants to respond only to the OP, they must use the (blue) GIO reply to sender function. is there any optionality on this?
(e.g., Joe posts: i need to borrow a ladder; this post goes to all 200 residents; Carol replies via gmail "i have a ladder", and all 200 residents get Carol's reply.? if Carol wants only Joe to know she has a ladder, Carol must ignore gmail's "reply" function, and seek GIO's reply to sender function.) |
Re: Photo Albums
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 07:35 PM, Maureen wrote:
Am I missing something obvious?No.? The Emailed Photos folder is only for attachments.? To do anything other than delete them would require you to download.? All other albums have the Move capability for individual photos, but not Copy. Duane -- The official Groups.io user documentation is in the Groups.io Help Center. GMF's Unofficial Help Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki |
Re: Moderators removed for spam
Hi Mike, Like your group, my groups have multiple owners so the chances of both going away at the same time is small. I go one farther, I have a second owner membership under a different email provider. For this, I generally use gmail, which I see is not on the list. That way, if my main Yahoo account is removed for any reason, I can still add myself back under the gmail account. Of course this doesn't prevent another owner from dumping all of the owners, in which case, I don't know of a cure. Choose carefully. Paul, Ohio, USA |
Re: Moderators removed for spam
Rli,
I was getting kicked out with the spam message even though there wereAOL has been one of the most aggressive about this. My understanding (and I've never used AOL so I'm not asserting certitude) is that the triggering event is when AOL deletes a message, based on an automatic deletion of "old" messages from the Spam folder. I don't know what time limit AOL might treat as "old". So the question would be how sure you are that their hadn't been a groups.io message in your Spam folder, just before your removal. If you have been routinely checking your Spam folder then I don't know how to explain your experience. Other than "thank you AOL" ;-) Shal -- Help: /static/help More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list |
Re: Moderators removed for spam
Shal,
I was getting kicked out with the spam message even though there were no groups.io messages in my spam folder (thank you AOL).
Sincerely,
Bob,
> If your "fundraising moderator" was ambitious it's possible that his > own email provider might label him as a spammer. While true, that's not germane to this topic. The circumstance here is of the moderator receiving a message from the group, not sending one to it. If a member's email service, even a moderator's or an owner's service, delivers a message to the Spam folder, and the person doesn't correct that action (mark the message as "not spam") the email service may send feedback to Groups.io claiming that the person is no longer interested in this list's messages. Shal -- Help: /static/help More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss