Huh. I just went and looked and cannot see what you're referring to. ?Here is a screen capture from our members list with names and email addresses redacted. Note that I've checked the 3 entries here that are not confirmed, and a couple more that are off screen above in the list:
Note that there are no additional choices that are not on the Actions list. ?And here is what the Actions list has on it: As you can see, there is no choice there to send anyone I have checked the Confirmation Message. Where is that hiding? --jeffp
|
Re: Integration Photos in Messages
Well never so quickly to things get resolved. I changed the picture size in settings to ?488 x488 at 8:03 this morning. ?A facebook integration came in at 8:09! The photo was still 720 x 720. ? I approved it even though it was larger than we'd like. ?However, the size is fine - as long as it doesn't force people on cell phones to run for a magnifying glass to see the tiny text. ?
--
-LeeAnne ?Archivist
|
Re: Integration Photos in Messages
Thanks Shal! We don't allow photos in messages but I'll try switching the max size. ?I think I had tried this before and it didn't help but who knows now. ?No one changed the settings it is still on "No Resizing" Yes the photos from the facebook integration are in line. ? I think, if I'm following this correctly, that the bug fix on Jan 20 is the one that helped us immensely. ?I will keep a sharper eye on the integrations. ? Again, Shal, thank you. ? Your patience with these questions is appreciated. ?Your answers and explanations make computers much less frustrating. ?
--? -LeeAnne ?Archivist
|
Re: Are other groups seeing lots of possibly spammy registration attempts?
#membership
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 08:37 am, Jeff Powell wrote: have you ever actually run email server software? I do. in our group we have a couple of people who regularly mark
group messages as spam Ban them, please.
|
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 02:04 pm, Sharon Villines wrote: I would delete the member and resubscribe them. How do you propose to "delete" them if they're not a member yet? And by "resubscribe them," are you talking about direct add (which most groups don't have), or are you suggesting send out invitations? Or contacting each pending member outside the system and ask THEM to resubscribe? I think if the original confirmation email went into their spam (or worse), doing any of these things is likely to just cause the same problems, or worse problems since you can't really "delete" them until they're actually there. J
|
I would delete the member and resubscribe them. That triggers another confirmation notice.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jan 24, 2017, at 3:31 PM, Jeff Powell <jrpstonecarver@...> wrote:
I can't resend the confirmation email... just the pending member notice. The confirmation email is under the control of groups.io, not the group owners/moderators. No way for me to resend that at all, even with the check boxes.
Or am I missing something?
--jeffp
|
Yep, my post just crossed with Duane's. There are other actions like this, I think. No rhyme or reason I can see as to which actions are in the checkbox dropdown vs. the member page...?
J
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Duane <txpigeon@...> wrote: Hmm, I went to check on a couple of my groups and found the same thing. A bit of experimenting later, I found that the "Send Confirmation Email" option ( a button at the bottom) is only available once you click on each person, not in the Actions drop down. Putting it in the Actions menu sounds like a good idea for either a bug fix or a suggestion on beta@. Duane
|
Shal Farley wrote:>>I'm using the same #changelog tag as he uses in beta, you can use it to follow or filter this sequence of threads.<<
Yep, John set it up where this thread goes into it's own folder too, so that's great!
Thanks, Shal!
Brenda
|
Yes, you're missing something. You can re-send it. It's either a checkbox action or an action from the member's page. I can't remember which.
J
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Jeff Powell <jrpstonecarver@...> wrote: I can't resend the confirmation email... just the pending member notice. The confirmation email is under the control of , not the group owners/moderators. No way for me to resend that at all, even with the check boxes. Or am I missing something? --jeffp
|
Hmm, I went to check on a couple of my groups and found the same thing. A bit of experimenting later, I found that the "Send Confirmation Email" option ( a button at the bottom) is only available once you click on each person, not in the Actions drop down. Putting it in the Actions menu sounds like a good idea for either a bug fix or a suggestion on beta@. Duane
|
I can't resend the confirmation email... just the pending member notice. The confirmation email is under the control of groups.io, not the group owners/moderators. No way for me to resend that at all, even with the check boxes. Or am I missing something? --jeffp
|
Re: Are other groups seeing lots of possibly spammy registration attempts?
#membership
Jeff, So, I need to point out that, at least for our group, the things in
groups.io are definitely not work related. Neither are mine. I was just talking about the utility of email overall. Next, have you ever actually run email server software? I have, and I
have zero desire to do it again, ever. No, really... ever. No, but I do know a few who have. Their reaction is similar to yours. Now put that responsibility into the hands of millions of people who
are not technical. Ack, who would even suggest such a nightmare? When I said self-hosted I was referring to corporate entities that can afford the necessary technical resources. I don't really know how many of my work clients host their own email domain and how many (like my company) contract with a hosting service. I guess one issue is whether the free services - Gmail, Live Mail (Or
whatever MS is calling it now), Apple's setup ... Yahoo, and the
other ISP provided services are doing well at running things. My experience with Gmail has also been very good in that regard. I've had some systematic false positives (e.g. all "new member joined" messages going to spam) but they've been easily corrected by marking them Not Spam. Otherwise I can't find fault with their spam discrimination, nor much with their inbox segregation of Social and Promotional messages into their own tabs. Another question is how well to users actually know what they are
doing? By way of example, in our group we have a couple of people who
regularly mark group messages as spam and are immediately ejected.
... Thus, I am not at all sure people are that good at working with
email. If they persist in making that mistake that might be a sign that their email service's UI is deficient in some way that encourages the incorrect handling of messages. Or they just might not be paying attention. In this case I'll paraphrase a well known statement: I doubt you'll find a foolproof communications channel - the fools are too damned clever for that! My original conjecture seems to remain open: there is some chance
that groups.io has been found by spammers in a significant way. Possibly. But I agree that it would be inevitable as the service grows. What if groups.io told us - right in the pending member list how many
groups the user has signed up for (not counting the support related
groups)? And how many they have been approved for? No group names are
needed - no privacy violation - but if I see a signup from someone
where they're trying to join 40 groups at once, I don't think I am
going to let them in. At first glance I'm not particularly fond of this idea. I think it is a kind of privacy invasion. Shal
|
You can use the checkboxes and just do one action ("resend confirmation email") for all of them (it still requires scrolling through). However, in my experience, re-sending rarely works. If the confirmation email went into spam, or didn't reach them at all (which has happened several times in my group), re-sending it will have the same effect.?
J
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Jeff Powell <jrpstonecarver@...> wrote: I've just noted that we have a smattering of members of our group who have never confirmed their membership with . ?(They have the NC icon next to their accounts in the members list.) In looking at their email delivery histories, I am a bit confused. One seems to have received the default welcome message, but others show now email deliveries at all. Apparently you must be a confirmed member of before you get any email from the groups you are a member of. What I cannot do is resend the confirmation email requests to all of those people, or even pull a list of them without scrolling through the entire list of members and finding them by examination. If I could pull a list - like I can for those who are "Pending Approval" - I could email them separately asking them to go find their confirmation messages, or (even better) if I could resend the confirmation notice to people in that state, I might be able to prod a few of those folks to confirm and become active members. Right now, all we owners and moderators can do is look at them and wonder why they bothered to join at all. Help? --jeffp
|
I've just noted that we have a smattering of members of our group who have never confirmed their membership with groups.io. ?(They have the NC icon next to their accounts in the members list.) In looking at their email delivery histories, I am a bit confused. One seems to have received the default welcome message, but others show now email deliveries at all. Apparently you must be a confirmed member of groups.io before you get any email from the groups you are a member of. What I cannot do is resend the confirmation email requests to all of those people, or even pull a list of them without scrolling through the entire list of members and finding them by examination. If I could pull a list - like I can for those who are "Pending Approval" - I could email them separately asking them to go find their confirmation messages, or (even better) if I could resend the confirmation notice to people in that state, I might be able to prod a few of those folks to confirm and become active members. Right now, all we owners and moderators can do is look at them and wonder why they bothered to join at all. Help? --jeffp
|
Re: Are other groups seeing lots of possibly spammy registration attempts?
#membership
So, I need to point out that, at least for our group, the things in groups.io are definitely not work related. People sign up for our group as individuals, not for work. And while there will be groups for work, I am sure, they definitely won't apply to everyone. Then we have all kinds of workplaces that don't want people using work email for personal matters. So, for many groups, people will sign up using personal - not work - email addresses. Next, have you ever actually run email server software? I have, and I have zero desire to do it again, ever. No, really... ever. The continuously changing spam situation, the constant need to update things to keep the spammers from finding their way through again, and so on. I've done it, and I can't imagine doing it again on my own. Now put that responsibility into the hands of millions of people who are not technical. The resulting spam apocalypse would completely ruin the system. So I, personally, would much rather put my trust in Google, or Apple, or Microsoft (though perhaps not in Yahoo... whose slogin is starting to look like an older McDonald's sign: "Over 1.5 Billion Compromised!") and let them manage email for me. Any ISP, in fact, is better than letting millions of people run their own mail software and all that would go with that. As it happens, I would also be happy to *pay* for the service. Thus far Google isn't requiring that of me, at least until I need more storage. And when that happens I will be happy to pay them. Honestly, if I want the product, I should pay, and I'd rather give them (or anyone else) a bit of money than all my personal information. But most people aren't willing to do that. "Moar free stuff, pleez!" seems to be the American motto of late, at least about the internet. We get what we get at some level. I guess one issue is whether the free services - Gmail, Live Mail (Or whatever MS is calling it now), Apple's setup (dunno the name... never bought into the Apple ecosystem), Yahoo, and the other ISP provided services are doing well at running things. Are the avoiding dropping important messages? Are the calling things spam that aren't? Are they cooperating with each other on issues to reduce spam? And so on. From my personal experience so far, Gmail is pretty good, at least as a user. The others I can't speak to as much, except for Yahoo and there penchant for letting user information get stolen. Repeatedly. In gigantic blocks. They've lost me forever as they appear to be utterly incompetent. Another question is how well to users actually know what they are doing? By way of example, in our group we have a couple of people who regularly mark group messages as spam and are immediately ejected. Then they immediately turn around and click on the link in the email to get back in. They do this all the time. (I know because I get notified when it happens.) Apparently some people think marking something as spam is a fine way of throwing email away. What some of us would do instead is delete it, but for these folks, it's spam, despite repeatedly being told by an automated system they shouldn't be doing that. Thus, I am not at all sure people are that good at working with email. They don't check their spam folders, and they don't manage their inboxes. In such an environment, messages from groups.io (confirmation messages and pending member messages, at least) can easily be missed, and their is nothing to be done for it but suffer. Sorry, I have wandered way off topic here. My original conjecture seems to remain open: there is some chance that groups.io has been found by spammers in a significant way. In fact, I know I have seen it mentioned in Mark's messages in the past. Our group's huge mail volume and media presence during the fire in the Santa Cruz Mountains a few months back might well have encouraged that issue, sadly. One of our wiki pages was being used to disseminate the best fire information we had, and links to that made it to various media outlets, as well as twitter and the Red Cross. If we were the proximal cause of more spammers finding the site, I apologize, but it would probably have happened anyway. Still, it seems that there ought to be stats available at some level about spam user signups. And perhaps some other things could be done. Imagine, for example, that a spammer signs up for a bunch of groups hosted here with the same email address at the same time. That's at least a risk flag, right? I don't care if they sign up for GMF and Updates and a few others, but if they sign up for our group, and (making names up) PuppyLove, LondonUndergroundTrainSpottersUnlimited, MathHeads, and PunkCabaretFans, well... maybe we've got a spammer on our hands. What if groups.io told us - right in the pending member list how many groups the user has signed up for (not counting the support related groups)? And how many they have been approved for? No group names are needed - no privacy violation - but if I see a signup from someone where they're trying to join 40 groups at once, I don't think I am going to let them in. Interesting thought. Might be helpful. And I would think the information is effectively in the database already and just needs to be shared with owners & moderators who approve membership requests. Thoughts?
|
Re: Integration Photos in Messages
LeeAnne, Our group integrates some facebook messages which always contain
photos. When we started this the pictures were so massive in the
messages that we had to stop.
...
I think Mark has now done some sort of auto sizing of pics this for
groups.io? Your group has a setting for that: "Max Photo Size In Email". You may have had it set to "No resizing" and another moderator changed it? A weirdness is that a bugfix reported on Jan 20 implies that those photos should have been resized anyway: "o BUGFIX: For messages originating in email (not web), we resized inline images to a max of 640x640, regardless of what the group settings were. Now, we are consistent with how web posting works, in that we resize to the max of (640, what the group size is)." /g/beta/message/12720But maybe messages from a Facebook integration would be treated as messages originated by web, or maybe none-of-the-above. I'm not sure. In any case I think the intent is that the control in your group should work regardless of where the message originated. If it isn't working that would be something to report to [email protected]. I'm also assuming that these images were "inline" (in the message body) not an attachment to the message. Though I'm not sure that distinction matters - it did once but I remember Mark being concerned that users often can't tell the difference. Another issue is that there are changes afoot regarding Facebook integrations. Also reported in that #changelog posting: "o CHANGE: Investigated issue with Facebook integrations, found out they don't work anymore because of Facebook, and disabled adding new ones for the time being." So my question to you is do we need to keep moderating the photos? I think I'd have to have a Facebook integration (which I don't) and do some testing to figure that out. And then it might change due to the changes Facebook is making (or has made) to the interface Groups.io uses for integrations. So I'll give a magic 8-ball answer: "Cannot predict now". Shal
|
Integration Photos in Messages
Hi Everyone Okay here goes. ?You are now going to see how horrible at technology I am. Our group integrates some facebook messages which always contain photos. ?When we started this the pictures were so massive in the messages that we had to stop. ?However the photos are important an our soution was to moderate the integration posts and then manually resize the pics to about 450x450. We've been working with the facebook people and have got them to make the photos they post smaller. ?I suppose facebook automatically adjusts the size of the photo on screens. ?Most of them are now about 800x800 but bigger ones get thru on occasion. ?
I think Mark has now done ?some sort of auto sizing of pics this for groups.io?? This morning I viewed a 800 x800 photo on my iphone and it was fine. ?No having tiny font or scrolling to read. So my question to you is do we need to keep moderating the photos? ?
--
-LeeAnne
?Archivist
|
Re: Are other groups seeing lots of possibly spammy registration attempts?
#membership
Jeff, I am starting to suspect that email as a communications vehicle is
breaking down. It might be time to investigate something else
entirely. That's not at all my experience. At work the vast majority of my communication with clients, and some coworkers, is via email. The incidence of lost, misdirected or delayed email is nearly zero. Granted though that nearly none of my correspondents are using consumer email services such as Gmail, Yahoo Mail, AOL, Outlook, or the like. Nor do I for work. Nearly all are using corporate email domains, either self-hosted or hosted by a commercial hosting service. So there may be a bit of "you get what you pay for" in play here. But even in my personal email I've seldom had a problem. Whether via an ISP or (for the last couple years) via Gmail, I've had a very low rate of spam and no or nearly no (detected) loss. The snarky side of me wants to say that people who won't check their email, or don't know how to control features like their email service's spam filter, perhaps ought not sign up for email lists. But I recognize that in many cases that might amount to blaming the victim, where it is the service that ought to be publicly shamed. Shal
|
Re: Are other groups seeing lots of possibly spammy registration attempts?
#membership
Well, again, I have gone to the same lengths that J_Catlady has, and sent a personal email - from my personal account, not via groups.io - to try and prod people to look for the message in their spam folders. So far that seems to elicit no response either. I am starting to suspect that email as a communications vehicle is breaking down. It might be time to investigate something else entirely. Slack, perhaps. *sigh*
|
Re: Are other groups seeing lots of possibly spammy registration attempts?
#membership
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 04:41 pm, Shal Farley wrote: So something is rotten, and likely not in Denmark. This is what I've been saying for a long time. And not just the pending member notices - the confirmation emails, too. I think those might be even worse. I've often re-sent and re-sent them, to no avail. J
|
LeeAnne
Lena
Nightowl >8#
Duane
Shal Farley