开云体育

Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 1:04 PM To: GMF Subject: [GMF] Transfer a Y!Group because of the Oath TOS? Ellen, The main thing bad about them is they believe they own the rights to everything you

Any recommendations dealing with unfriendly, unneighborly, rude and even hurtful language on a neighborhood group. We are a restricted membership, unmoderated, no Anonymous posts allowed. We just went

They can have anything I post through any of my groups or any of my members post through any of the groups. ? Most have gotten off the?net anyway. They are graphics, tags and sharing groups. ?

Ellen, ?No, the Oath TOS <https://policies.oath.com/us/en/oath/terms/otos/index.html> specifically states that you retain ownership of any IP rights that you hold in the content (that you posted or

I had a problem with them the minute they wanted me to sign giving them the rights to anything sent through them.? I should have kept that msg ... I didn’t. I just moved my groups out of there the

Barb B, 1) Can the address [email protected] also be used for the main group? > ?Yes.? ?No.? Subgroup names need only be unique within the group, so they can't be used in a format without the

Hi, I tried to find this topic because I thought I remembered reading something about but couldn't find it. So, when you have a main group with a subgroup, I know the emails "officially" become: Main

Jim H, Mark's service, Mark's rules. I respect that completely... but IMO one ?On beta Mark invited comment <https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/23242689#17662> from anyone who sees any issues with

Tamara ?, ? Some discussion has occurred in our Groups.io discussion group that needs What do you mean by "back"? If all of the messages in question were originally on the Y!Group then they should

Bill, ?I believe Jim was talking about different groups, some with *Reply To* set to *Group*, other groups set to *Sender*.? Those with *Reply To* set to *Group* are not affected by this change,

Thank you Shal, I see now I have reached that point - though I wasted a few days in the confusion zone :-(

Mark's proposal on beta was: "...by not stripping the incoming Reply-To for groups set to Reply To Sender Only (or tagged appropriately)" If (as you say above) your group is set as "Reply To -> Group

Our club has an "executive session" group on yahoo, and I am not the owner of that group. ?Some discussion has occurred in our Groups.io discussion group that needs to be removed from our Groups.io

Received from David M at 7/11/2018 11:14 PM UTC: Both choices have their own drawbacks. No replies should go anywhere other than the default setting chosen by the admin of the group... unless the

David, So what if the person who needs to see the replies is not a member of the ?As in Y!Groups, there is a group option to allow non-subscribers to post messages. In Groups.io all such messages

David, ? ?Yes. Just to confirm: https://beta.groups.io/g/main/topic/23242689#17662 ? I'm uncertain, from what Mark said, if he actually limited it to Announcement Groups (as he described in the

The issue is that the others are not specific people who do it regularly. They would not have a clue what this is about, and I would have to explain it to them in detail each time it needed to be

So what if the person who needs to see the replies is not a member of the group? I refer you to my earlier comments that this is an announcement group. David

Which is worse? Subscribers replying to the admin when they think they are replying to the person in the Reply-To:, or replying to the person in the Reply-To: when they are thinking they are replying

This appears to be a bug which has been fixed. In announcement groups, a Reply-To: on an incoming message will now be carried over to the message being sent out to group members. David