> The reason for using Reply-To: is that most of the members just reply
to messages, even when the content of the message states to contact
someone else. Reply-To: takes it out of their hands.
Yes, you might be changing the reply default, however although I have my groups set up to "Reply to Sender", many people do what they have to in order to reply to the group instead.
That said, I agree that your best bet is still to have your group set to "Reply to Sender", and have the person who wants the replies send the message.
So what if the person who needs to see the replies is not a member of the group?
What is the protection that a third party Reply-To email address wants the replies?
Why would Groups.io want to enable such a SPAMMING prone tool?
I refer you to my earlier comments that this is an announcement group.
David
