Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- GroupManagersForum
- Messages
Search
Re: Restricted Subgroup?
#subgroups
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:03 AM, Linda Lou wrote:
Can a particular subgroup be restricted to the membership?Sure!? A subgroup can be totally separate from the main group in that respect.? You just have to make sure you use the proper settings for everything.? If you haven't already, you may want to read over the pages at /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/Why-use-a-Subgroup and /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/Subgroups Duane -- GMF's Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki Help: /static/help A few site FAQs: /static/pricing#frequently-asked-questions |
Re: Restricted Subgroup?
#subgroups
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:03 AM, Linda Lou wrote:
Can a particular subgroup be restricted to the membership? I have a group (cycling club) and want a private subgroup for just the board members that I do not want the entire membership to access. Can a single subgroup be restricted?That is the point of subgroups. All members of the subgroup must be members of the main group though. They can set their delivery for the main group to more limited delivery, but they must be members. /static/help#subscription-options /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/Subgroups /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki/Why-use-a-Subgroup Frances -- GMF Wiki: (unofficial) Help for members (and would-be members) and group managers and Official Help |
Restricted Subgroup?
#subgroups
Linda Lou
Can a particular subgroup be restricted to the membership? I have a group (cycling club) and want a private subgroup for just the board members that I do not want the entire membership to access. Can a single subgroup be restricted?
Thanks |
Re: Received daily digests before subscription was approved
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 04:54 AM, EJP wrote:
This is a bug. I am not a member of a group until membership approval takes place, and I should not receive digests before that.I can't reconstruct the problem, but I agree. I recently experienced a different problem with digest delivery (ref:?), but haven't been able to replicate that, either. I'm now wondering if these may have arisen in association with a recent (Feb 28) change in timing of digest delivery (ref:?). In any event, I agree with Duane that someone who has actually experienced this should be the one to report it.? Regards, Bruce |
Re: Received daily digests before subscription was approved
My test is completed.? When attempting to join a restricted group with private archives, no digest was sent.? I suspect that the groups that EJP joined have public archives, so not a data leak.? As others have mentioned, I think this should still be considered a bug.? It would be best if someone that's experienced the anomaly reported it on the beta group so they could furnish any other details of the process.
Duane -- GMF's Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki Help: /static/help A few site FAQs: /static/pricing#frequently-asked-questions |
Re: Received daily digests before subscription was approved
My thought:
You are either a member (of a group) - in which case you get (subject to your choice) messages by e-mail (individually or otherwise), or not - in which case you don't (and shouldn't).? A pending member is not (yet) a member: they only become a member once approved. Hence they should not get message e-mails (in any form). => this is a bug. Accessibility of group archives, if public, is an irrelevance. Jeremy |
Re: Received daily digests before subscription was approved
>?can you positively confirm that the two groups to which you referred?are?Restricted. (i.e. applicants requiring moderator approval)
Yes, of course, otherwise I wouldn't be reporting an issue about receiving a digest before subscription approval. I don't know why I am being asked to reiterate this. > Did they require you to submit a response to a Pending Subscription message Yes. > and if so did you send one to each of them? Yes. > And exactly what notifications did you receive that your membership requests had been passed? Further messages from the moderators. In both cases I mentioned the issue to them. This is a bug. I am not a member of a group until membership approval takes place, and I should not receive digests before that. Consider if the membership had been disapproved: this would have been a prima facie information leak. |
Re: Anyone having this issue with bouncing members?
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 02:47 AM, Christopher W. wrote:
To the people who've been around longer: is this the sort of thing thatNo, the members should report it to their mail service provider.? The 4xx isn't serious and GIO will try resending the message.? The 5xx is a hard bounce, so GIO won't send it again. Duane -- GMF's Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki Help: /static/help A few site FAQs: /static/pricing#frequently-asked-questions |
Re: Anyone having this issue with bouncing members?
On 2020-04-05 at 9:24:24 AM, Niman H <nimanh2000@...> wrote:
I checked my bouncing members list today and found several there, all withTo the people who've been around longer: is this the sort of thing that should be reported to [email protected] so that they're aware of the situation with this host? E.g., is there a per-host configuration that is maintained that would, say, throttle messages being sent to avoid/limit these soft of bounces. -- Christopher W. <lists@...> |
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 08:50 PM, Loren Lang wrote:
I am trying to better understand how calendar permissions for modifying events work between the different levels.Moderators/Owners can edit any event.? Members can only modify events they've created. The lock button prevents changes to any RSVP responses for the event. Duane -- GMF's Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki Help: /static/help A few site FAQs: /static/pricing#frequently-asked-questions |
I am trying to better understand how calendar permissions for modifying events work between the different levels. Looking on the help page, I do not even see the work Calendar mentioned. From what I understand, there are 4 levels of access: public, member, moderator, and owner. As far as modifying an event, there is no difference between a moderator or an owner. Public can have either view access or no access. What I'm not sure about is the different access permissions between members that can edit and moderators.
As a regular member, I have permission to edit events on this particular calendar. There are event created by moderators, but I cannot modify them in any way. Is this always the case? And also, creating events as a regular member, can other members modify my event? I would expect that moderators always can. There is also a button that allows me to lock an event. What does that do exactly? - Loren |
Re: Can't find a way to disallow photos in email
Yes, Chris, I have now disabled uploading of photos. We don't have such albums anyway, at least for now. Unless my other owner just disabled attachments, it had already been set to strip them. So, if it had been set to strip them before, it didn't in the case of embedded pictures. It might be stripping attached pictures with links to them, but not embedded.
|
Re: Can't find a way to disallow photos in email
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 09:06 PM, Herb Gellis wrote:
Attachments are disallowed (stripped from email). I just set photos to disallowed now.Do you mean that you have also disabled the uploading of Photos to the Photo Albums as well; if so did you really mean to do that? Just setting attachments to be stripped is enough to stop attachments without disabling Photo uploads. And you can still run HTML, although IIRC someone really determined could still possibly insert a photo into a message, but I suspect that the likelihood would be pretty small. Chris |
Re: Can't find a way to disallow photos in email
OK, with photos disabled, attachments stripped (as before), an email with an embedded picture comes through with a bounding box where the picture would be, showing the alternate text inside, that would be displayed in a text-only situation. I am using Thunderbird to send the email, and it has an option to embed a picture. If the picture is attached, but not embedded, the link shown basically is an empty page. If the photo is a link whose picture is not attached to the message (hence an ordinary hyperlink), then that link works, no photo is embedded. So I think the combination of no photos with attachments stripped will do it.
|
to navigate to use esc to dismiss