¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

RSS Feed questions

 

Hello

I'm having another go at integrating a feed on our forum. It's

I know it works 'cos in Thunderbird, (email client), it downloaded 20 articles immediately

But after adding it to integrations in GroupsIO, nothing happened.

Is this because GroupsIO integration only fetches new content from a feed?

There are no setting for this in GroupsIO so I can't tell it to download anything.

Thanks


Re: Stats

 

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 01:31 PM, Steve wrote:
Any talk or interest in getting stats on views of individual group.io message posts?
I'm not 100% sure, but I think you can already do that.? You have to upgrade your group to Enterprise, then install Google Analytics.

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.


Re: Files Permissions Possibility?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

>>> Is it possible to have members upload to a single folder in FILES but not others? We would like to allow upload into ONLY 00.0.
>>> And we would like to restrict any possibility of moving things once the Moderator has placed the?submission?into the proper folder to only the Moderators, but it seems the current system allows Moderators and the submitter to do this.?
?
Without doing any testing on these two parts, I want to say that you can accomplish the first part by using the group-level setting you show, and since you can set also folder-level permissions, editing then each Files' top-level folder -except the 0.00 one- to disallow members uploading to it.? I'm not sure if one of those member-upload-disallowed folders has a subfolder if it inherits the parent permission or you would also have to do this to any subfolders of those, but you can check if so to see what happens and let us know.

But I think the problem you're alluding to in the second part is that even if the mod moves it into a different folder, the original uploader can still move it, right?? If so, supposedly they would only be able to move it to the 0.00 folder so it would be like a re-upload of sorts.?

Anyway, the setting you'd like to have is "Members can view and upload only" but the issue with that though is that would remove the capability of the original uploader to delete their file if they want, as that function would also be swept under the "member cannot do anything more to the file after being uploaded" restriction so I don't know if such a setting would be desirable, I guess you can post it as a #suggestion to and see what happens.

A kind-of a workaround in the meantime could be for a mod to save the member-uploaded file and then re-upload it themselves but into the corresponding folder, and this way only them and the other mods can edit it, however the file then wouldn't show as being uploaded by the actual member, but then again I guess the uploader's name could be included in the file description.

Cheers,
Christos


Re: reason for bouncing

 

When I changed my domain name/email hosting company a few months ago I checked
first that I could have all spam filtering switched off. They are in UK. Send
me a private email if you would like to know who it is (this is not the place
for advertising).

Jim Fisher

On 23 Feb 2024 at 2:21, Martyn Bell wrote:

Subject: Re: [GMF] reason for bouncing
To: [email protected]
From: "Martyn Bell" <martyn@...>
Date sent: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 02:21:51 -0800
Send reply to: [email protected]

In my case my email host for my domain introduced SPAMCOP a couple of years ago,
this creates lots of blocking but annoyingly allows most spam through. There is
a status page on mine to check the blocking situation. I've had many
disagreements with my hosting company because this was added without my
knowledge. Imagine if the postman started doing this as he approached you
letterbox. Martyn






Re: Stats

Glenn Glazer
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

On 02/23/2024 09:04, Steve wrote:
Any talk or interest in getting stats on views of individual group.io message posts?

How would you count people who only read email?

Best,

Glenn

--
Sic semper tyrannis


Files Permissions Possibility?

Jim Perry
 

Is it possible to have members upload to a single folder in FILES but not others?

Explanation:

We are reorganizing?our Files. In order to maintain?our new Files structure, we would like to have list members upload their submissions to an "Upload your Files Here" folder, and then have our Moderators place their submission into the proper folder. The screenshot below may help. We would like to allow upload into ONLY 00.0. And we would like to restrict any possibility of moving things once the Moderator has placed the?submission?into the proper folder to only the Moderators, but it seems the current system allows Moderators and the submitter to do this.?
?
It would seem we want something that is a bit of a modification of the second screenshot.

Screenshot 1
image.png
?
Screenshot 2
image.png
?
--

Jim Perry

[excessive multiline sig trimmed by moderator]


Stats

 

Any talk or interest in getting stats on views of individual group.io message posts?


Re: reason for bouncing

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks... I just did the search and it looks like that atmail is the owner of The Messaging Company, who are gradually taking over the email branch of my ISP, Westnet.
I have not yet been transferred to them, yet it seems they are already blocking mail.
I will definitely phone? Westnet tomorrow, to try to straighten things out.
Win

On 23/02/2024 4:20 pm, Jim Ringland wrote:

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 07:02 PM, WBennett wrote:
However, I'm wondering if you can tell me WHO is bouncing me, from this message in the notification... and why.
mx-10.au-east.atmailcloud.com: 550 Rejected - Content Policy
I need to know if it is a problem with my ISP so I can talk to them.
Poking around the web, it looks like atmail provides e-mail services for some telecoms, governments, and businesses.? (I did a search on atmailcloud.)? Your ISP may have contracted its e-mail out to them.? The 550 error means the messages were stopped by atmail's spam filter.? So yes, contact your ISP.? Groups.io may be trying to work this from their end too.? -- Jim Ringland


Re: reason for bouncing

 

In my case my email host for my domain introduced SPAMCOP a couple of years ago, this creates lots of blocking but annoyingly allows most spam through.
There is a status page on mine to check the blocking situation.
I've had many disagreements with my hosting company because this was added without my knowledge.
Imagine if the postman started doing this as he approached you letterbox.
Martyn?


Re: reason for bouncing

 

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 07:02 PM, WBennett wrote:
However, I'm wondering if you can tell me WHO is bouncing me, from this message in the notification... and why.
mx-10.au-east.atmailcloud.com: 550 Rejected - Content Policy
I need to know if it is a problem with my ISP so I can talk to them.
Poking around the web, it looks like atmail provides e-mail services for some telecoms, governments, and businesses.? (I did a search on atmailcloud.)? Your ISP may have contracted its e-mail out to them.? The 550 error means the messages were stopped by atmail's spam filter.? So yes, contact your ISP.? Groups.io may be trying to work this from their end too.? -- Jim Ringland


Re: Why are members getting a confirm email message

 

Thanks to all who responded. The issue seems resolved at this point.


Re: reason for bouncing

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Yes,? but WHO are they? certainly not my ISP, as far as I know.
How do I find out?
Win

On 23/02/2024 1:06 pm, Duane wrote:

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 09:02 PM, WBennett wrote:
tell me WHO is bouncing me
mx-10.au-east.atmailcloud.com is/was bouncing messages sent to you.? Only they can tell you why.

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.



Re: reason for bouncing

 

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 09:02 PM, WBennett wrote:
tell me WHO is bouncing me
mx-10.au-east.atmailcloud.com is/was bouncing messages sent to you.? Only they can tell you why.

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.


Re: reason for bouncing

 


reason for bouncing

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Yesterday I received an email saying I was bouncing? and my entire groups.io groups have had emails suspended.
I immediately clicked on the link to unbounce me and it is fine now.
However, I'm wondering if you can tell me WHO is bouncing me, from this message in the notification... and why.

mx-10.au-east.atmailcloud.com: 550 Rejected - Content Policy

I need to know if it is a problem with my ISP so I can talk to them.

Thanks for any help.

Win


Re: Does emailing "<groupname>+owner@<groupname>.groups.io" work?

 

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:19 PM, godboutm wrote:
The owners email address listed there is <groupname>+[email protected], without the "<groupname>" after the '@'. Both addresses work and each email I received had the "From" address as the full <groupname+owner@<groupname>,.
They're a bit different if you have subgroups (groupname before and after @) or not (groupname only before @).

Duane
--
Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.


Re: Does emailing "<groupname>+owner@<groupname>.groups.io" work?

 

Thanks for the reply, Frances. It looks like my first test email was delayed. I saw it in Activity, but it didn't arrive until after I sent the email to this?GMF group. A second test, about 10 minutes ago, arrived immediately. So who knows?

One thing I did notice - After your email I took a second look at the User Manual and saw something I didn't notice earlier. The owners email address listed there is <groupname>+[email protected], without the "<groupname>" after the '@'. Both addresses work and each email I received had the "From" address as the full <groupname+owner@<groupname>,.

Anyway, thanks again.
--Marc




On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 4:06?PM Frances <frances@...> wrote:
First, I set myself to "All emails". Then I sent an email to that <groupname>+owners email address from a separate account, with a different email service than the one I use for Groups.io, but nothing came to me from Groups.io.
?
Am I missing something? Or is this a feature that doesn't work?
Check in Admin, Activity.
And in your subscription, did you tick All Email in Owner Email. And save it?

Did you read?/helpcenter/ownersmanual/1/sending-and-receiving-group-owner-email-messages?single=true

Frances
--
Help available from Groups.io help and GMF wiki.

?


Re: Does emailing "<groupname>+owner@<groupname>.groups.io" work?

 

First, I set myself to "All emails". Then I sent an email to that <groupname>+owners email address from a separate account, with a different email service than the one I use for Groups.io, but nothing came to me from Groups.io.
?
Am I missing something? Or is this a feature that doesn't work?
Check in Admin, Activity.
And in your subscription, did you tick All Email in Owner Email. And save it?

Did you read?/helpcenter/ownersmanual/1/sending-and-receiving-group-owner-email-messages?single=true

Frances
--
Help available from Groups.io help and GMF wiki.

?


Does emailing "<groupname>+owner@<groupname>.groups.io" work?

 

While going?through some various admin duties on the group that I own, I ran across a Members setting - "Owners Email" - that directs how that member should receive emails sent to "<groupname>+owner@<groupname>.". "<groupname>" is replaced with the actual name of the group I own, and am testing out. The selections are "All emails", Members emails", and "None". So I set out to test it.

First, I set myself to "All emails". Then I sent an email to that <groupname>+owners email address from a separate account, with a different email service than the one I use for Groups.io, but nothing came to me from Groups.io.

Am I missing something? Or is this a feature that doesn't work?

Thanks.
--Marc


Re: Thread Reply: @ sign being replaced by an = sign

 

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 11:38 AM, KWKloeber wrote:
The cats can randomly do better.
lol.? My wife refers to moderating her groups as "herding cats".

I agree that "Reply All" is bad, but on the Yahoo Android App, that is the only "reply" button in view.? One has to dig a level to find a simple "Reply".? ?Having said that, the groups.io server sent out that address, so it should be able to at least determine that the email is not actually seeking a groupname as a recipient.? Seems that a more elegant solution could be had with a little better server side error management.