¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Gerald, [voice="Nomad"] Non-sequitur. Your facts are uncoordinated. [/voice] "The Changeling", Star Trek TOS. https://youtu.be/C_R5fK73Eaw -- Help: /static/help More Help:
By Shal Farley · #12122 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Do we know any spammers? What do they do? They make a living by minimizing being flagged as spammers. By spammers, I am not (necessarily) referring to the really nefarious ones. For example, it is
By Gerald Boutin <groupsio@...> · #12121 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
We agree that it is desirable for subscribers/members not to become unexpected unsubscribed and for Groups.io's reputation to improve. The differences on how to achieve this are either philosophical
By Michael Pavan · #12120 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Patty, Very simple. You gave as part of your criticism of the FBL mechanism that the people removed weren't spammers, they were members. You said it twice, so I took that to be a serious part of you
By Shal Farley · #12119 ·
Re: Hiding files from other than moderators #question
I'd like to have the ability to restrict a database to only owners. Right now we use google docs to keep our main member database. That database has information that we would only want the highest
By Nancy Funk · #12118 ·
Re: members being removed
Amen! Cacky
By Cacky B · #12117 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Don't understand how I have the cart before the horse, here.? We may be wrangling with semantics, here, but the end result (whether we say the action is telling groups.io the list member doesn't want
By Patty Sliney · #12116 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
There is no groups.io staff to do what you want. I would rather have Mark doing technical things than documentation things. We in GMF can do the latter...if we're willing to. I hire others to do
By Bruce · #12115 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
This points out that some subscribers/members recognize that it is easier to unsubscribe by mis-marking Groups.io messages as SPAM, than to find and go through the unsubscribe process
By Michael Pavan · #12114 ·
Re: New to Groups.io #question
Thanks so very much everyone. You are wonderful!! I will read up and give it a go.? It sounds like it will be the best option for us. Wish me luck Humbly yours, Pamela
By Pamela Tatt · #12113 ·
Re: pay for group
Jim, Another thought occurred to me. If we were to start donating by upgrading One can choose the group transfer plan (Premium for one month). It doesn't include an automatic renewal each month so
By Shal Farley · #12112 ·
Re: pay for group
Received from Ellen at 9/28/2018 02:15 AM UTC: Another thought occurred to me. If we were to start donating by upgrading for a month then Mark's ability to project future income is lessened because he
By Jim Higgins <HigginsJ@...> · #12111 ·
Re: pay for group
Received from Anita L via Groups.Io at 9/28/2018 02:25 AM UTC: You can't absolutely compel them, but you can provide "incentive." If enough people continue to mark messages as spam they can lead an
By Jim Higgins <HigginsJ@...> · #12110 ·
Re: pay for group
Prices, along with features and functionality for each package can be found at /static/pricing . This is where I'd strongly encourage you to talk with a lawyer that specializes in
By toki · #12109 ·
Re: pay for group
... Implementing the code is trivial. Complying with the legal requirements to accept donations is fairly complex. As a for-profit, I doubt that it would be legally possible to accept donations
By toki · #12108 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
I have had some of my subscribers actively do this. They decided that they really didn't want any more group messages. Rather than bother figuring out how to unsub, a message was marked as spam, and
By Bruce · #12107 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Samuel, I think the best way to "educate" users about a problem such as this one I certainly agree with that, it is what Groups.io already attempts to do. That speaks directly to to Patty's issue. In
By Shal Farley · #12106 ·
Re: members being removed
I think perhaps the mail providers have become more aggressive classifying emails as spam. Today I started seeing replies to an email chain where I did not receive the first message, even though I was
By Tom Link · #12105 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Michael, My ¡®opt-out¡¯ button suggestion is to opt-out of receiving the regular Ah, that's better than what I thought you meant. Still, I'm concerned that those messages would themselves be
By Shal Farley · #12104 ·
Re: How best to educate about the 'Removed for SPAM' problem
Patty, Okay, for fear of getting stomped on, again, since I've been a vocal You still seem to have the cart before the horse: When the email service sends a report to Groups.io, they are *not* saying
By Shal Farley · #12103 ·