Does anyone know of a way to print a monthly calendar without seeing the event details such as repeat?

I've had to click the subscribe to this calendar, and paste the link into the group's home page (as our website link)? in order to get a printable calendar.
But I can't reference it as the calendar, which makes it useless to my group.
--
Norm

It would be very unusual if it did. And wrong, given that Groups.io's servers are not in any way under the control of the member's email service.

That is correct regarding SPFs and that is why a server doing SPF checking is going to consider an email "from" domain X is invalid because it came from groups.io servers. My example has nothing to do with DMARC but shows how "spoofing" that an email is directly from someone is, in fact, a red flag to proper email handling.? Other mail lists do not do this type of spoofing and are therefore not blocked.

The only services that should be having that kind of issue are those that have elected to use a "reject" policy in their DMARC records. Those services are incompatible with traditional mailing lists, but Groups.io (and Y!Groups and some others) have adapted to that. Most other lists I'm on simply don't support users of those services as members.

There are servers that do not use DMARC records but still block email for internal domains that appear to originate from outside.? DMARC is a relatively recent addition to email processing and most private/enterprise servers do not rely on DMARC for protection.? Your statement "Most other lists I'm on simply don't support users of those services as members" is myopic at best. I found a number of examples in this forum of major services not allowing that type of spoofing and I am a member of a number of other list providers (beyond Y!Groups but including Y!Groups) who alter the "from" address so SPAM filtering algorithms that are based on sender domains do not block list messages.? By altering the "from" address to show the message was originated via the group (which it is) ensures proper delivery under all cases by allowing users to unblock groups.io at a level available to users (as most users cannot alter corporate or ISV rules regarding rogue email generation from outside).

No, only in the case of a reject policy in their DMARC record, I think, and that's handled.

Again, this statement is, at best, myopic and stating "if your email provider does this type of blocking and is not using DMARC, we won't support you." tells the millions of users out there that are using those type of services "Too, bad; we are going to remove a level of protection by spoofing your email address to appear to be generated from our servers instead of yours."? Worse, this is not explained anywhere in groups.io information on what would cause bouncing that was not occurring in groups that get transferred and we are stuck with the transfer and a large number of users who no longer can use the service.

If their rule were that simple their users couldn't participate in mailing lists at all - at least not lists that have fellow users. That is, if both Alice and Bob use 's service, they'd not be able to see each other's posts.

The only services that should be having that kind of issue are those that have elected to use a "reject" policy in their DMARC records. Those services are incompatible with traditional mailing lists, but Groups.io (and Y!Groups and some others) have adapted to that. Most other lists I'm on simply don't support users of those services as members.

As Dave indicated, there are many organizations? that have this rule and have had no problem with mail lists -because- the email is properly denoted as having originated via the list, not from that organization.? This type of policy predates DMARC usage and most lists that predate DMARC alter the from address to indicate the message is from the list, not directly from the individual.? This simple indicator resolves SPF failures and internal domain blocking algorithms that have nothing to do with or predate DMARC.

You indicated getting this option in "beta".? How do I do that and how do I get my groups set up to be part of that beta?

Pete

开云体育

--
Help: /static/help
More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list

开云体育

If you delete a group, that group name can't be reused for some indefinite time.? Best to just rename it on the Settings page.? You'll also need to correct it in the Welcome message.

Duane
--
Help: /static/help
GMF's Wiki: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Search button at the top of Messages list
A few site FAQs: /static/pricing#frequently-asked-questions

If you did not get too far, go get the name you want
and forget or delete the one with the error.
(OR)<?>
You seem to be able to change it in Admin, Settings,
General, but maybe not.

What you want has to be available of course.

Rick, I'm kinda new here...

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 04:54 am, dash wrote:

I misspelled the name of the group I am creating.? How do I fix that?

The simplest thing to do, if you haven't gotten too far into the process, is to hit the "Delete Group" button at the bottom of the Settings page and start over.

Otherwise, see?/g/GroupManagersForum/message/4029?and subsequent messages in the thread.

Bruce

We have members who are not part of the "predefined" list of mail servers that require "via group.io" address modification.? Is there a way to either force it for all members (similar to Yahoo) or at least for those who are having issues?? I see 2 places where this is necessary: the user's server has an SPF record associated with it which does not include groups.io or the user's server does not allow internal email addresses originated externally.? In both cases, it is extremely important to be able to "turn on" the "via groups.io" functionality.

Re:?/g/GroupManagersForum/message/7208
This works too, (above), keeps quoting and the archives small, but
is no good to people off line or reading in email program downloads.

"leave a little" is the best answer, but hard to sell, and harder yet to
get "everyone" to do...

Rick

On 10 Apr 2018 at 9:42, Patrick 2E0ETF wrote:

i just had an issue with another groups.io group where we were having a number
of replies to a Message. i responded to another member?s reply directed at me.
Now another member has complained that when I reply I should have quoted the
message that I replied to.

my response is that the message was part of a thread and expanding the message
shows all the messages. Several other members agreed.?

It is always better to include enough of the message you are replying to to
show the context and clarify the meaning of your message. You may read messages
on the web site, where the whole thread/topic is available, but many, including
me, use an email client and rarely if ever visit the web site. That means the
only context we have is what is shown on your message. I sometimes find replies
sent with nothing quoted are completely meaningless to me for that reason.

Jim Fisher

--
- My thoughts on freedom (needs updating)
- political snippets, especially economic policy
- misc. snippets, some political, some not
Forget Google! I search with which doesn't spy on you

Thanks everyone,
Obviously I haven't gotten to the point of trying to add a lot of members in my test group yet. I'm going off of what I see on the screens and in discussion. So I'm learning a whole lot from all of you.

As far as bulk add, yep, I plan to get the transfer routine to set up the subgroups as far as it can. But I may need to add the main membership to a new subgroup every other month depending on how I end up having to organize subgroups - which is why I asked for a new feature allowing subgroups to have their own subgroups. It sounds like we may have work arounds for the add so I'll try them out when I get enough members in my test group.
Thanks again
Beth

Thanks Shal and Bruce,
The missing messages ARE searchable. I looked/searched all the way back to 2001...
And searched what "appeared" to be one of the the missing years (2014) during the reverse
stepping I tried to describe.

(Went right now, looked and...)
I narrowed it down. The WEB site display at .IO seems to use multiple numbering segments
(or bands of numbers) and when reversing inside different bands of sequences the results
are VERY odd... Example, years going missing, messages assigned impossible numbers
because we were not here when those number would have been assigned.
In any event, this is an issue Group Owners can't solve on their own...
Seems like a Yahoo export issue or a .IO import one...
I think I need to get into a "beta test" group here... (The beta group does not test...)<??>

Disclaimer: If something that seems impossible is happening, I seem to root it out very easily...

Rick

It’s horses for courses ... I see different people have different ways of reading these threads.?

I do do like the idea of just cutting and pasting a few lines to get the context.?

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:42 am, RickGlaz wrote:

IF toggling the message view button in the upper right hand corner on the
Groups .IO WEB message reader page jumps 5 years suddenly going in reverse,
would that be an indication the transfer is incomplete for messages,
or an indexing and or a display problem?

Seems to me that's an indication that:

• your group transfer is probably complete, and
• your message archives span 5 years.

That sort-order button almost caught me on one occasion -- I believe it was right here in GMF -- when I didn't realize I had changed it and began to compose a reply to a message from 2014 or so.?Fortunately, I figured it out before hitting "send"...but I realized that if I could make that mistake, others could too. At that point I changed my own group settings so all topics are locked after 60 days.

Bruce

--
Help: /static/help
More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list

--
Help: /static/help
More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 04:54 am, Beth Weld wrote:

btw, where is the API documentation? I found it weeks ago, but not now when I was actually looking for it.?

What I was referring to can be found at /api#direct-add?See the Notes section for the function.

Bruce

I'm assuming when the member count on the .IO specific-Group WEB Home page
"jumps" and you also get a Welcome message from the Group, (to a spare test account),
at that point the system "thinks" it is done. (Correct?)

(After that.)
IF toggling the message view button in the upper right hand corner on the
Groups .IO WEB message reader page jumps 5 years suddenly going in reverse,
would that be an indication the transfer is incomplete for messages,
or an indexing and or a display problem?

Welcome message went out around 6am today, should I wait and check tomorrow?
(I last looked at 9-10am and ONLY at the messages and stopped...)

Disclaimer: I am looking as a normal MEMBER and have no elevated privileges
in that specific Group.

Off group messages are OK...

Rick

On April 11, 2018 at 4:12 AM Shal Farley <shals2nd@...> wrote:


Paul,

So, in such a case would we then have an opportunity to make a 2nd transfer

request asking that the things which had been 'left behnd' could be moved?


Or, is a 2nd attempt to transfer any 'left behind' things not something
that Groups.io is able to do?

Yes, you can.

If you go to the "In Process" page for the completed transfer there's a red
button at the bottom that will allow you to delete the old transfer status.
Then you initiate a new transfer from the same Y!Group to the Groups.io
group, selecting only the sections that were missing.

If a section was only partially copied (e.g. some files copied, some not) I
believe the automation will automatically skip any content that is already
present in the Groups.io group, but I haven't tested that (and haven't had
to, knock-on-wood).

The idea here is that some of Yahoo Groups' failures have been sporadic, so
it is possible that a second attempt may be able to copy some items that
hadn't been accessible the first time. If you can now access (using the
normal Yahoo Group web page) any of the items listed as not transferred,
then there's a good chance that the transfer agent will be able to now
also. If you can't, maybe wait in hope that you can later.

Also, if you can now it would likely be prudent to go ahead and download
them manually (if there aren't so many as to make that impractical), just
in case.

Shal

Sent from my WEBmail.