开云体育

Hopefully you are careful when you do the removal surgery. :-) FWIW, our group (like several of the cats veterinary groups) does not even allow vet names to be mentioned onlist. There can be a fine

I misunderstood what J meant.? Sorry Any surgeon can make an error.? Until we actually see the complaint content and evaluate it it would be unfair to the surgeons. The content had to be removed.

This gets tricky because you can't ever delete the most current edit. You would have to do at least one more edit in order to remove the blank one. You might simply copy and paste the original content

I thought there was some dropoff date, like two weeks or something, after which pending members who haven't been approved get removed from pending. But this seems not to be happening. Does anyone

Bob, There is, sort-of. You could do as J does, and edit the message(s) instead of deleting them. This would solve two problems: 1) The messages would still be in the archive, so emails replying to

Hey J! I never considered off list contact.? Don't understand what I said that made you even think that. BTW, We've discussed just how to handle this yesterday.?? Since the message(s) have already

Not TMI. We have similar issues in our veterinary-related group and use NuM as you do. My comments were addressed specifically to the case you describe. We frequently get non-internet savvy members

Sorry if you got too many responses. I didn't realize there was such a thing.;) Am just seeing this now. No need for offlist contact in my case, please. Thanks. J Sent from my iPhone

Shut down the bubble machine or at least pause it, please.?? We have enough information to build a reasonable decision tree and even an unreasonable one.<g> I'm grateful but it seems that the more

We don't moderate all messages, just the first four from a new member because all of our new members go through a comprehensive join request form that gives us several key tokens to check them out.

Thank you a bunch. Shal. I can use each and every one of your responses for the several conditions we encounter. I was surprised to see that there are 12 messages on this topic and have to review the

I'd never heard of that and am interested. What part of the U.S. is that? J

That's your interpretation, but not necessarily the only one, since there are multiple definitions. In this part of the US, a reminder may be the first time someone has seen something, so region does

I think I have a solution. "Group Guidelines (sent to all new members and monthly to the group)" That's my working title. J

Ok. But the suggestion to rename or split threads will not work in an unmoderated group when the member has *already* posted a message off-topic to the thread. The problem Bob brings up here is one

Well, this is becoming silly. "Recalling" the past or "reminding" something clearly refer to something the person has already been told. I'm not putting the word "reminder" in the initial set of

Then using it as I will is correct (#2): http://www.thefreedictionary.com/reminder 1. something that recalls the past 2. a note to remind a person of something not done Also:

J, He didn't. That was an alternative in my response to his third bullet item. Shal

I believe i Have the subject of "monthly rules" i my guide lines that every member?receives.?And if they do not follow them 3 times they are out, for good. We have 400 members and I don't have

I don't see where Bob said his concern is only for pending messages requiring approval. If so, I agree with you. Not seeing that, though... J