开云体育

Sorry if you got too many responses. I didn't realize there was such a thing.;) Am just seeing this now. No need for offlist contact in my case, please. Thanks. J Sent from my iPhone

Shut down the bubble machine or at least pause it, please.?? We have enough information to build a reasonable decision tree and even an unreasonable one.<g> I'm grateful but it seems that the more

We don't moderate all messages, just the first four from a new member because all of our new members go through a comprehensive join request form that gives us several key tokens to check them out.

Thank you a bunch. Shal. I can use each and every one of your responses for the several conditions we encounter. I was surprised to see that there are 12 messages on this topic and have to review the

I'd never heard of that and am interested. What part of the U.S. is that? J

That's your interpretation, but not necessarily the only one, since there are multiple definitions. In this part of the US, a reminder may be the first time someone has seen something, so region does

I think I have a solution. "Group Guidelines (sent to all new members and monthly to the group)" That's my working title. J

Ok. But the suggestion to rename or split threads will not work in an unmoderated group when the member has *already* posted a message off-topic to the thread. The problem Bob brings up here is one

Well, this is becoming silly. "Recalling" the past or "reminding" something clearly refer to something the person has already been told. I'm not putting the word "reminder" in the initial set of

Then using it as I will is correct (#2): http://www.thefreedictionary.com/reminder 1. something that recalls the past 2. a note to remind a person of something not done Also:

J, He didn't. That was an alternative in my response to his third bullet item. Shal

I believe i Have the subject of "monthly rules" i my guide lines that every member?receives.?And if they do not follow them 3 times they are out, for good. We have 400 members and I don't have

I don't see where Bob said his concern is only for pending messages requiring approval. If so, I agree with you. Not seeing that, though... J

J, Again, in this case the intent was to start a new thread (topic) with the message in question. No one yet has received it or its subject (being edited in Pending) and there are no older messages

First, changing a thread title or splitting a thread doesn't work. If you either (a) split a thread into one with a new name, or even (b) rename the entire thread, people responding via email still

I don't the word 'reminder' changes meaning much. And I personally would never use it in the first guidelines message a member receives. Using 'scheduled' is a slight improvement. J Sent from my

Duane, "Should" being the operative word here. As J notes, if it is a reply to a message that has since been deleted then that original won't be found in any topic and this reply will be treated as a

Yes, it's not a reminder of something previously seen or mentioned, but I'm thinking of it as a reminder to read and follow the guidelines. How you would interpret it may depend on which country or

A reply online or with the proper reply-to headers in an email should go to the old thread. If the header is missing via email, it may go to the old one, but not sure of the time variable. I've run

J, Huh? The intent in this case is to create a new topic with its own options for locking or moderation. I don't understand what you mean about subverting future use of those features. Shal