Re: editingposts
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThats exactly the problem!? Sending an edited post as a new post!? I dont want that, and obviously, others here dont want that either.? WE dont consider it a new post, irregardless of whether YOU do and we dont want them.? We dont want to have re read it, or go to the website to figure out whats new, etc etc.? We just want the option to eliminate that in settings.??? Nothing in this conversation is about viewing on the web.? The whole purpose is to not have to read repetitive posts when recieving posts as individual emails.???
This conversation seem fruitless.? Its clear that several of us want this setting, I have asked for it to be done in the Beta group, and its up to Mark now. Ro with Sally and Silk waiting at their feed dishes, and Handy, Feliz &? Police Kitty patrolling in the Great Beyond. > Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:10:43 -0800 > To: [email protected] > From: shals2nd@... > Subject: Re: [GMF] editingposts > > Ro, > > > If they want to make a change, they can just make a new post. > > That's what editing a message does: re-sends it by email as a new post (with a note at the top saying that it was edited). Unless you're a moderator and choose not to resend it. > > If you read messages on the web the difference between editing and posting a new message is that if the message is edited you'll see only the most recent version. Unless you click on the Edited badge, which will let you see prior versions and compare versions. > > > Has nothing to do with closing threads, in fact, I dont want to close > > threads, my group has never needed to do so..... > > I didn't think so, I only mentioned it because it is the only thing I know of that disables editing. > > -- Shal > > > > |
Ro