As long as systematically we are good, I am satisfied.? I'm not worrying at this point, I'm just... curious.?? :D
I am running interference on eager beavers creating their own IDs on GIO.? I just wanted to have some plausibility if I got pushback on asking them to delete their IDs here (I don't feel like trying to merge IDs.)
We thankfully have some generous contributors that have -er- contributed so I wasn't stuck for the fee, plus late in the game we got a corporate sponsor who agreed to underwriting the original fee.? Haven't yet told him of the 100% increase, nor about the 100% grease that's available for the wheels.?? Those will be discussions for after the group is up and running.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 8:33 AM Bruce Bowman <bruce.bowman@...> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 07:06 AM, rich hurd wrote:
I've seen this since Friday. ?
Rich -- According to , he is letting transfers stack up differently now; they will begin to collect in the queue at the stage you're currently at, rather than at the "accept the transfer agent's invitation" stage. Those details are in the next-to-last paragraph of the message.
Be advised that in the past the transfer queue has sometimes been as deep as two weeks or more.
When should I start worrying?
Seems to me that you already have.? :-)? ?But all glib remarks aside -- and if it eases your mind at all -- I don't see anything in your screenshot to suggest that anything is amiss. If you want priority on your transfer you can always pony up the extra $200 (ouch...did I really say that?).
Regards, Bruce
--
¡°We?choose to go to the Moon in this decade and?do?the other?things, not because they are easy, but?because they are hard.¡± ¨D John F Kennedy