Re: reply to sender/group
|
No objection to you having the ability to eliminate the "Reply to Sender"
Button on the web interface.??? My only concern is that this
needs to be a separate choice from simply setting the Reply to Group as the
default.? Your original comments seemed to be wanting the Reply to Sender
button disabled when you set the reply default to group -- THAT isn't acceptable
-- but having a separate choice to disable/eliminate the button is a good
idea.
?
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 11:27 AM ?
I dont quite understand anyone being against a group
owner having the option to eliminate, for members, the Reply to Sender
button.? Those owners that dont want to use such a option, neednt do
so.? It needed affect any that dont want to use such a feature.??
Its really no different than the idea that you can set your group to Moderate or
Not Moderate new messages.? Its about having the choice.? Freedom of
choice, for the group owner, is the issue in this discussion.?? Yahoo
doesnt have the Reply to Sender choice, yet one can certainly PM
people.?? In this specific case, Yahoo has it over IO groups,
IMO.??? I can see tho, that most dont feel the same way that I do
so it will be probably a fruitless battle to suggest it in
Beta.??? Perhaps not many people have been the recipient of as
many misdirected "Reply to Sender" messages as I have, which I then have to
forward to the group.??
[excess quote trimmed by moderator]
|
