When one designs a "table" the setup uses "Rows" and "Columns" to identify what you are configuring.
This is what set in my mind instead of ID field.
Since I'm more of a "doer" than an "documenter" I leave the mental conversion of my Row terminology to ID as an exercise for the reader.
(Or possibly, as an Edit for the Moderator<g>)
FWIW Maybe we should petition Support to hide or even delete the ID field since many people may confuse it with the numeric position of the record in the data set when it's actually a relative position.
--
Bob Bellizzi
Founder, Fuchs Friends??
Founder & Executive Director,?
