开云体育

Chris,

The (serious) downside is that the font size is such that it feels as
though one's eyeballs are being attacked with a lump hammer; ...

I had the same reaction.

For GMF's longer pages I simply capitulated, reasoning that the utility of the TOC outweighed the style. I sort-of get the problem: in order to have many levels you end up with extremes at the top and bottom levels.

I've toyed with the idea of looking at the CSS for the wiki to see if those header styles can be adjusted to suit the nesting depth of a given page; but I've never found the round tuit appropriate to that task.

Either I am doing something silly (a possibility that cannot be
discounted!) or the ToC formatting is completely awry.

All I can tell you is that every time I tried to get clever with the header levels the TOC punished me for it. I've only had success by ensuring that I've used the headers in proper hierarchy and that every other paragraph is a P.

I think I will ditch the idea of any ToC ... rather than hold up the
production of the wiki page; after all it's the substance of it that
matters rather than having a ToC at the top.

Agreed, content is king.

Until I made my peace with the way it looks my pages also went without a TOC. And not every page is long enough or structured enough to need one.

Shal


--
Help: /static/help
More Help: /g/GroupManagersForum/wiki
Even More Help: Search button at the top of Messages list