On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:50 PM, toki wrote:
I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice
Given that there is quote a lot of it, what "status" would you then ascribe to it? It seems odd to spend time and effort posting a detailed comment and then
nearly saying "don't pay any attention to it".
To add to my previous comment, if my original digging found the right target then the organisation to which the OP referred (now no longer traceable from scratch; I suspect that the original message was later edited to remove a revealing detail) also has a publicly accessible Facebook page. I therefore pose similar questions to that I asked previously; have all the people whose photographs appear on that Facebook page provided written consent for their likenesses to be used, and how often are they required to renew that permission? Have all those whose names appear as having "liked" something also given their permission for their names to be revealed? Have you asked Facebook to provide a facility similar to that you are considering requesting from Groups.io?
At the risk of being accused of repeating myself I am of the view that considering asking Groups.io to provide a technical solution to a problem that your committee has (I think) more or less invented is wholly unreasonable, unless of course you can specify some part of the GDPR (as interpreted in <location redacted>) that will be breached if the capability is
not provided.
Chris
