开云体育

AA6YQ comments below

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of
bchriste9149
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 11:04 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] LotW - unrecognized mode


I've just started using LotW and eQSL.cc. When I uploaded 1 qso to LotW, I
got an error message that it didn't like the JT6M mode. Is there a list of
acceptable modes for LotW

Yes, in <>

and is there a way of uploading my qso without changing the mode?

You can configure TQSL to "map" a digital mode to DATA, but when you

later direct DXKeeper to synchronize, it will report that it cannot find the
QSO in your log (because the uploaded QSO has a mode of DATA but the logged
QSO will has a mode of JT65A). In the next release, I'm planning to modify
DXKeeper to consider DATA a match for any mode that counts as RTTY towards
ARRL awards.


With eQSL.cc I got a similar error, trying to upload a JT65A mode.

I defer to Rich W3ZJ on eQSL.cc matters.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

At 01:05 AM 9/4/2009, you wrote:

What are the CALLSIGN/140 anyway?? They are everywhere.



-Dick-
N3XRU

Hiram Percy Maxim's 140th birthday:



73, Paul VE1DX

What are the CALLSIGN/140 anyway?? They are everywhere.



-Dick-
N3XRU



_____

From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...] On Behalf Of
DANNY DOUGLAS
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 7:47 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] stupid /1440





I knew this stupid /140 behind all these stateside calls was gonna screw up
data bases. Every spot with the /140 results in the hams name being printed
out in WinWarbler, but the QTHs are not there - including state . The Zones
are also missing in Spot Collector, because the programs do not know what to

do with that info, and it "might" be someone mobile, or some such. I guess,
with my VE certifica, I am elgible, but WILL NOT ever use such an indicator.

I hate them On DX, I hate them on local calls. I hate green eggs and ham.

Danny Douglas
N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB

All 2 years or more (except Novice)
Pls QSL direct, buro, or LOTW preferred,
I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for
those who do.

Moderator
DXandTALK
. <>
yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
DXandTALK@YAHOOGROU <mailto:DXandTALK%40YAHOOGROUPS.COM> PS.COM

Moderator
Digital_modes
.
<>
yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159

I've just started using LotW and eQSL.cc. When I uploaded 1 qso to LotW, I got an error message that it didn't like the JT6M mode. Is there a list of acceptable modes for LotW and is there a way of uploading my qso without changing the mode?

With eQSL.cc I got a similar error, trying to upload a JT65A mode.

Thanks for the help.

Bob C WU9Q

I knew this stupid /140 behind all these stateside calls was gonna screw up data bases. Every spot with the /140 results in the hams name being printed out in WinWarbler, but the QTHs are not there - including state . The Zones are also missing in Spot Collector, because the programs do not know what to do with that info, and it "might" be someone mobile, or some such. I guess, with my VE certifica, I am elgible, but WILL NOT ever use such an indicator. I hate them On DX, I hate them on local calls. I hate green eggs and ham.

Danny Douglas
N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB

All 2 years or more (except Novice)
Pls QSL direct, buro, or LOTW preferred,
I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for
those who do.

Moderator
DXandTALK

DXandTALK@...

Moderator
Digital_modes

AA6YQ comments below

--- In dxlab@..., lratcliff lratcliff <lratcliff@...> wrote:

In DXKeeper, the Capture window has disappeared. It is showing in the
task bar, but when I restore it, the other windows gray out, but it
doesn't show anywhere. It was doing in before I just upgraded the
software, and is still doing it after.

Please try the procedure described in

<>

If this doesn't recover the Capture window, please let me know.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

In DXKeeper, the Capture window has disappeared. It is showing in the
task bar, but when I restore it, the other windows gray out, but it
doesn't show anywhere. It was doing in before I just upgraded the
software, and is still doing it after.

What am I doing wrong? Im sure its a setting here on the computer causeing it.

Lee
KC4ART

Thank you very much Dave,

Best wishes!
Anela - e74ee




________________________________
From: Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...>
To: dxlab@...
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2009 10:48:26 PM
Subject: RE: [dxlab] Re: Diferent station callsigns

Do all of your QSOs made as T95LKA have their "station callsign" item set to
T95LKA? Each QSO's "station callsign" item is displayed in the Auxiliary
panel on the Main window's "Log QSOs" tab.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Anela
Karacic
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 4:35 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: Re: [dxlab] Re: Diferent station callsigns


My call sign Dave!
Earlier i had a T95LKA callsign, now it is E74EE. Both logs are in a same
file, now I wuold like to know if I can export them separately devided by
call sign?
Thank you!
Anela - e74ee




________________________________
From: aa6yq <aa6yq@...>
To: dxlab@...
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2009 10:01:43 PM
Subject: [dxlab] Re: Diferent station callsigns

AA6YQ comments below

--- In dxlab@yahoogroups. com, Anela Karacic <anelae74ee@ ...> wrote:

I ask you before about this topic and you gave me an answer...

Before, I hade two question how to export one part of my log (by date)? You
explain me and I make it.

Second question was How to export a part of my log (By call signs)? YOU also
gave ma an explanation, but I stil, can not make it? Simply I do not know
how to do that, I tried to make a steps as it is explain in HELP option, but
again without any succsses.

Which callsign, Anela? Your callsign, or your QSO partner's callsign?

73,

Dave, AA6YQ












------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.13.74/2339 - Release Date: 09/03/09
05:50:00



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Do all of your QSOs made as T95LKA have their "station callsign" item set to
T95LKA? Each QSO's "station callsign" item is displayed in the Auxiliary
panel on the Main window's "Log QSOs" tab.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

My call sign Dave!
Earlier i had a T95LKA callsign, now it is E74EE. Both logs are in a same file, now I wuold like to know if I can export them separately devided by call sign?
Thank you!
Anela - e74ee




________________________________
From: aa6yq <aa6yq@...>
To: dxlab@...
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2009 10:01:43 PM
Subject: [dxlab] Re: Diferent station callsigns

AA6YQ comments below

--- In dxlab@yahoogroups. com, Anela Karacic <anelae74ee@ ...> wrote:

I ask you before about this topic and you gave me an answer...

Before, I hade two question how to export one part of my log (by date)? You explain me and I make it.

Second question was How to export a part of my log (By call signs)? YOU also gave ma an explanation, but I stil, can not make it? Simply I do not know how to do that, I tried to make a steps as it is explain in HELP option, but again without any succsses.

Which callsign, Anela? Your callsign, or your QSO partner's callsign?

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

Hello Dave ,

One minor for PF : When focus is transferred from another window to pf window the cursor indicator is visible in the 'enter call' field.
However when focus was in pf window (while checking out a qrz entry for example) and you return the focus to the entry field of pf by clicking in it the cursor indicator is invisible making editing of a call already in it a little bit difficult.

My wish for pf : To transfer a call from fe SC to PF you will have to double click a SC row , at the same time the DXK capture window is filled. How about just sending the call to pf on selection in SC, i like to check a call for fun in qrz via PF but need to clear the capture window every time afterwards.

Best regards,

Bernard Grijpstra PA3FZV

AA6YQ comments below

--- In dxlab@..., Anela Karacic <anelae74ee@...> wrote:

I ask you before about this topic and you gave me an answer...

Before, I hade two question how to export one part of my log (by date)? You explain me and I make it.

Second question was How to export a part of my log (By call signs)? YOU also gave ma an explanation, but I stil, can not make it? Simply I do not know how to do that, I tried to make a steps as it is explain in HELP option, but again without any succsses.

Which callsign, Anela? Your callsign, or your QSO partner's callsign?

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

Dear Dave and other,

I ask you before about this topic and you gave me an answer...

Before, I hade two question how to export one part of my log (by date)? You explain me and I make it.

Second question was How to export a part of my log (By call signs)? YOU also gave ma an explanation, but I stil, can not make it? Simply I do not know how to do that, I tried to make a steps as it is explain in HELP option, but again without any succsses.

If it is not a problem for you, please try one more time to help me with this!

Thank you!

Anela - e74ee

In it's Main window's "Main VFO" and "Sub VFO" panels, Commander is designed
to display two digits to the right of the "decimal point" (more correctly
described as the "decimal separator").

Several months ago, Howard K7JNX pointed out that in locales where a
character other than the period is used as the decimal separator, Commander
displays three digits to the right of the decimal separator. This is the
result of a defect.

If I correct this defect, those of you operating from locales that use a
comma or another character as the decimal separator will see the number of
decimal digits to the right of the decimal separator reduced from 3 to 2.
Will anyone view this as a loss of important functionality?

The alternative would be to add an option that controls whether 2 or 3
decimal digits are displayed. My preference is to just correct the defect,
as adding an option will increase the complexity as perceived by new users.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

AA6YQ comments below

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of
jvoelkelt
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 1:23 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] Re: DOK references


thanks for the info dave, this will give me a starting point to bring my log
completely up to date and get the info properly entered. did a real quick
check with some of the french dept and find that some of the cities are not
on dxkeeper list, anyway will play around with in some more and see what i
can do.

DXKeeper's "list" -- and the subject of the DDFM award -- are French and

Corsican Departements, not French cities. For the DDFM rules, see

<>

and for a list of the 95 "D???partements fran???ais de la m???tropole" and their
codes, see

<>

These 95 departments are specified by ADIF as Primary Administrative

Subdivisions for France and Corsica.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

--- In dxlab@..., "Steve GW4BKG" <gw4bkg@...> wrote:

Joe,
Firstly I do not want to detract in any way from the superb work Dave is doing with DXKeeper in supporting most of the major awards.
Like you I am working my way through the very many QSL cards I have acquired over the last 30 years to see what awards I may qualify for in addition to the ones I already hold.
I think it is fair to say that almost any QSL can be used for some award or other & there are very many obscure ones out there !
For me the definitive list is that maintained by Ted,K1BV.
It is an on-line subscription based system which Ted keeps up to date & covers over 100 countries.
His annual change is very modest indeed.
I have no vested interest apart from being a regular user of his website at www.dxawards.com/
73s
Steve
GW4BKG

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

thanks for the info steve will look into it as it would be nice to have something to supplement what dave has working in dx keeper. joe kl7lf

--- In dxlab@..., "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@...> wrote:

AA6YQ comments below

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of
jvoelkelt
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:42 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] Re: DOK references

the info needed is to give me the ability to reconcile all my qsl cards so
that the proper info is entered in the award field for region/county etc.
lots of times i have no way of know what region/county/district etc i have
worked and have no way at present to reconcile my qsl card info against what
dxkeeper expects to be put in that field. thanks joe kl7lf

If you don't know what region/county/district is associate with a QSO

(meaning that you didn't log the information at the time of the QSO and the
its not specified on the QSL card), then your only options are a callbook
lookup (but not all callbooks supply this information, and the user may have
moved after the QSO was made) or contact with your QSO partner (e.g. via
email). Some awards require you to submit QSL cards; cards that don't
substantiate the region/county/district will likely not be accepted.

For Primary and Secondary Administrative Subdivision items (e.g. states,

provinces, departments, oblasts, cities, guns, prefectures), DXKeeper
presents you with a list of valid choices. As most of these subdivisions are
specified by a code that you may not recognize, you can click the item's ?
button; DXKeeper will then display a window that lets you select the
appropriate code by the subdivision's full name. For example, you can click
on "Bouches-du-Rhone", and DXKeeper will set the Primary Administrative
Subdivision item (labeled "Department" in a French QSO) to 13.

The table in <> and

the notes following this table describe exactly what DXKeeper expects you to
record for each supported award. It also provides hyperlinks so that you can
see exactly how a WAB square or IARC Area is determined.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

thanks for the info dave, this will give me a starting point to bring my log completely up to date and get the info properly entered. did a real quick check with some of the french dept and find that some of the cities are not on dxkeeper list, anyway will play around with in some more and see what i can do. thanks dave. joe kl7lf

AA6YQ comments below

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of
jvoelkelt
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:42 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] Re: DOK references

the info needed is to give me the ability to reconcile all my qsl cards so
that the proper info is entered in the award field for region/county etc.
lots of times i have no way of know what region/county/district etc i have
worked and have no way at present to reconcile my qsl card info against what
dxkeeper expects to be put in that field. thanks joe kl7lf

If you don't know what region/county/district is associate with a QSO

(meaning that you didn't log the information at the time of the QSO and the
its not specified on the QSL card), then your only options are a callbook
lookup (but not all callbooks supply this information, and the user may have
moved after the QSO was made) or contact with your QSO partner (e.g. via
email). Some awards require you to submit QSL cards; cards that don't
substantiate the region/county/district will likely not be accepted.

For Primary and Secondary Administrative Subdivision items (e.g. states,

provinces, departments, oblasts, cities, guns, prefectures), DXKeeper
presents you with a list of valid choices. As most of these subdivisions are
specified by a code that you may not recognize, you can click the item's ?
button; DXKeeper will then display a window that lets you select the
appropriate code by the subdivision's full name. For example, you can click
on "Bouches-du-Rhone", and DXKeeper will set the Primary Administrative
Subdivision item (labeled "Department" in a French QSO) to 13.

The table in <> and

the notes following this table describe exactly what DXKeeper expects you to
record for each supported award. It also provides hyperlinks so that you can
see exactly how a WAB square or IARC Area is determined.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

Joe,
Firstly I do not want to detract in any way from the superb work Dave is doing with DXKeeper in supporting most of the major awards.
Like you I am working my way through the very many QSL cards I have acquired over the last 30 years to see what awards I may qualify for in addition to the ones I already hold.
I think it is fair to say that almost any QSL can be used for some award or other & there are very many obscure ones out there !
For me the definitive list is that maintained by Ted,K1BV.
It is an on-line subscription based system which Ted keeps up to date & covers over 100 countries.
His annual change is very modest indeed.
I have no vested interest apart from being a regular user of his website at www.dxawards.com/
73s
Steve
GW4BKG

--- In dxlab@..., "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@...> wrote:

AA6YQ comments below

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of
jvoelkelt
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:08 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: [dxlab] Re: DOK references


--- In dxlab@..., "Steve GW4BKG" <gw4bkg@> wrote:

Dave,
Thanks for the guidance on SQL expressions.
I had overlooked the need to use the "ADIF field name" option rather than

just "DOK".

I can now see how to better construct such queries in the future.
Koen,
There are many different awards that involved the working of various DOKs

& not just DARC ones.

One I looked at earlier is the Baden Diploma where there is a requirement

to work multiple "A" DOKs hence the query.

Dave,
The drop down list in DXKeeper includes some "special event" DOKs as well

as standard ones.

I find that I have worked DOK IBO 83 which does not feature in your list.
However includes

what I believe is a definitive list of all special DOKs some of which are
temporary.

IBO 83 is temporary but there are other IBO DOKs which are also temporary

which do in fact feature in the dropdown.

I assume that some awards may involve working such temporary DOKs but

within certain time constraints.

However there must be several hundred of these so I guess including them

all is not feasible.

73s
Steve
GW4BKG


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

thanks for the info on the dok's do you or is there anyone else that can
help me/maybe others in getting similar info for other lists such as wab,
italian districts/counties, french dept etc.

What sort of information are you seeking, Joe? Unlike the DOK list, the

WAB, WAIP, and DDFM lists rarely change, and are already provided by
DXKeeper. To get more information about the awards supported by DXKeeper,
click on the hyperlinks in the Award column of

<>

i already have all the info i need for the various jcc awards and most of
the info for russian oblasts. i am going through some 14k qsl cards at the
present time to get this kind of info entered so i can start chasing paper
for some of the awards out there.

To test the new WAIP support, I just did this with my stack of Italian

and Sardinian QSLs; I estimate that 80% of these cards specified a province
name or code.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

the info needed is to give me the ability to reconcile all my qsl cards so that the proper info is entered in the award field for region/county etc. lots of times i have no way of know what region/county/district etc i have worked and have no way at present to reconcile my qsl card info against what dxkeeper expects to be put in that field. thanks joe kl7lf