The WPX award program has some "interesting" rules for computing prefixes
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
from callsigns; see section 3 in <> In particular, note part C of that section: "Example: LX/WN5N would count as LXO" To determine what callsigns are responsible for your 1BO and 1KO prefixes, run the "CQ WPX" panel's Submission report; it lists a callsign for each prefix. If you think that one or more prefixes have been computing incorrectly, please let me know and I'll take a look. 73, Dave, AA6YQ -----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Phil Cooper Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 11:43 AM To: dxlab@... Subject: [dxlab] A query about the WPX report Hi again! After checking my WAC tally, I also decided to check my WPX progress. After running the report, it produces a nice list of prefixes. My query is that it shows I have worked prefixes that I cannot find in my log! For example, it shows I have worked 1B0 and 1K0, but no such calls exist. I know I have the right SQL expression, as filtering for a known good call works OK - I used CY9. So, how come I end up with prefixes like 1B0 and 1K0 that are clearly not valid, and do not appear to be in my log? And one final thought........... Would it be useful to have a call (or calls??) listed for these prefixes in the WPX list? The WPX application form has to show call, date, time, band, mode etc, but the WPX report doesn't really provide this info. As I have over 1000 WPX's, it does get a little tiresome having to filter the log for each WPX, QSL received etc. 73 for now Phil GU0SUP --- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 090906-1, 06/09/2009 Tested on: 07/09/2009 16:42:58 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.13.74/2339 - Release Date: 09/07/09 06:40:00 |