¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Shim Screw Tool Post (SSTP)

 

Hi, Rance. Aluminum (aluminium) is strong, but it has been my experience that threaded holes are easily stripped or deformed with twisting motions. Steel would probably be best. As for the stability, try using a shimming block against the inside vertical surface of the tool, between it and the tool post. Good luck, Ron.


---- rancerupp <rupps@...> wrote:

Thanks Ron, and to Clint for posting the pics.
Ron, others, would you think that al. would be sufficient for this or
does it have to be steel? The toolpost that comes with the 8x12 seems
huge. I would think that an alum. one of the same dimensions would be
fine.

Also Ron, did you have any problems with the mounted tool bit
twisting while using your set screw configuration? Clint had
expressed concern of rigidity.

Rance


--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "Ronald Durbin"
<trainguy_347@...> wrote:

I have done this with a smaller post, except that
I used set screws (or grub screws, as our British brothers and
sisters
call them) comming up from the bottom. To adjust, just undo the
retaining nut on top, lift up the post, back off the top screw
slightly, engage (run further in) the bottom screw tightly, and
replace the post as per normal. This sometimes take a few tries,
but
once the height is achieved, all is well. Great drawings, by the
way!.
Ron.


Re: Advice Sought for New User

Jim
 

If you are more interested in having the parts you describe instead of learning and playing with a lathe, you might do well to consider www.emachineshop.com. They have a small software program to download that allows you to make a sketch that gets quoted. You can experiment with a variety of manufacturing techniques, materials, quantities, tolerances, etc. to see what each option would cost. You can do all of this before you submit it to them for manufacture. You can also email them about other manufacturing options that you may not be aware of.
As others have said, the learning curve and cost of additional tooling are both fairly steep - worth it, mind you, if that is what you want to do, but otherwise maybe not the best approach.
Jim


nicipi <nicipi@...> wrote:
First, thanks for all your feedback Mike, John, Ian and Mike - you
guys have added a lot to my sense of what's involved in this
endeavor. I should at least clarify my tolerances.

The wall thickness can actually be anywhere between 16thou and
32thou, and every one that I make can be in that range (don't all
need to be identical); the only restriction here is that it still be
flarable. Also, the thickness should be relative to the 0.437" outer
diameter of the main part of the tube (the 0.437" can be plus/minus
5thou or maybe even 10thou). It is important that the
0.625" "outward rolled-like bead" be clean and rounded (a picture
would really help here - I have a photo and a schematic but don't
know how to share it with you guys). Otherwise, the surfaces don't
need to be perfect, so for example, as John points out, the inside of
the tube can be done with just drill/bore (if I'm using the right
wording).

What I first need to do is make sure I understand the procedural
options here. Each of you guys have added something unique to try,
and I've been reading your instructions over and over. What's just
now becoming a little clearer to me are things like what does the
tailstock do, what are the options for supporting the piece, what are
centers, etc., and most importantly, what is a mandrel and how is it
used (so that I can implement Mike's technique or variant thereof -
the mandrel seems to be a key here.) It certainly would be helpful
to see one of these machines up close and in action. I even looked
on youtube but only one video came up when I searched on "mini-lathe"
and it wasn't very enlightening.

Nicipi


Re: Shim Screw Tool Post (SSTP)

 

Thanks Ron, and to Clint for posting the pics.

I went to the local scrap yard (for the 1st time) and found a
plethora of alum. scraps. I got 2' of 1.5" bar stock and a 6"x1"
square plate for starters. I'm gonna be going back there often. :)
I'll go ahead and fine-tune my shimming for this first tool but the
first thing I want to do is to build a new tool post as I've
described.

Ron, others, would you think that al. would be sufficient for this or
does it have to be steel? The toolpost that comes with the 8x12 seems
huge. I would think that an alum. one of the same dimensions would be
fine.

Also Ron, did you have any problems with the mounted tool bit
twisting while using your set screw configuration? Clint had
expressed concern of rigidity.

Rance


--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "Ronald Durbin"
<trainguy_347@...> wrote:

I have done this with a smaller post, except that
I used set screws (or grub screws, as our British brothers and
sisters
call them) comming up from the bottom. To adjust, just undo the
retaining nut on top, lift up the post, back off the top screw
slightly, engage (run further in) the bottom screw tightly, and
replace the post as per normal. This sometimes take a few tries,
but
once the height is achieved, all is well. Great drawings, by the
way!.
Ron.


Re: circuit board diagram

Ian Fletcher
 

Thanks for advice, resistors ordered at cost of ?1 so if that is all that is wrong I shall have saved ?84 !! Thanks for your interest and support. Ian

-----Original Message-----
From: born4something <ajs@...>
Date: Fri Mar 30 08:07:03 GMT 2007
To: 7x12minilathe@...
Subject: [7x12minilathe] Re: circuit board diagram
Hi Ian,
66 ohms sounds a bit high. You may have tricked people with that
space between the R and 66. Electronics types often use the prefix
as a decimal point (like 1k2 means 1.2k-ohms) and when there is no
prefix they just insert the base symbol, R. So R66 is likely 0.66
ohms. It's a convenient notation and avoids using those little dots
that don't print clearly and are often multiplied when photocopying
stuff!
Check the other resistor. If it is 0.66 ohms I'd expect quite a
reasonable reading in circuit without even unsoldering it as the
surrounding components are unlikely to be anywhere near as low as
that. If they are, it's likely a failed FET or triac, depending on
your model.
John
--- In 7x12minilathe@..., andrew franks <andyf1108@...>
wrote:

Looks as though it might be: 5W = 5 watts, R66 = 66 ohm. Not sure
about the J, though - could represent a tolerance (as in plus or
minus a certain percentage from the marked resistance value).
However, 66 ohms isn't a standard "preffered" value - 68 ohms is,
though. Can you unsolder its twin, if it has identical markings, and
check it? If it is 66 ohms, you may have to use a couple of 33 ohm
ones, and connect them in series (though if you use 68 ohms, it's
probably close enough).
As to wattage, if you can't get 5 watts from Maplin or
somewhere, get the next size up.
I wonder what made it burn out, though? Hopefully, it was
something simple like a short circuit caused by swarf.
Andy
ftr1d <ian.fletcher@...> wrote:
Hi, I have just purchased a 240 volt Clarke 300m with a
dead circuit
board. A new board will cost ?85 so I am looking to repair it. The
only
fault I can see is a blown ceramic block, one of a pair, which is
marked 5WR 66J and is in R1 position on the board. I assume it is
a
creamic resistor? Does anyone have a circuit diagram or can give
me the
specification of the part. Thanks Ian






---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Mail is the ultimate force in competitive emailing.
Find out more at the Yahoo! Mail Championships. Plus: play games and
win prizes.



Re: Tail Stock Cam Lock Kit installed!

Victoria Welch
 

On Friday 30 March 2007, born4something wrote:
Hi Vikki,

Don't feel too bad about that. A while back I made a similar blunder.

I knew cast iron had a rather high carbon content (~5% from memory)
but had never machined it before. So I mounted up my brand new face
plate to give it an initial facing cut - to true it. Wanting a
decent finish I kept up a goodly supply of WD40 aerosol. On a 160mm
disk it flicked everywhere. I had a nice line up the splash guard,
up the wall behind, fell short of the ceiling, down the driver's
door on my wife's car, across the floor and up my shirt. It took
some cleaning up.

So there are at least two of us who will remember not to lubricate
cast iron next time!
Comparatively I was lucky, all I had was a goopy pile in the tailstock
and some spatter on the drill press table!

Next time I will remember that. One has to be so careful about using
fluids around spinning things here and the less of it the better!

My face plate is still in the bag with the red goo, I'm very glad you
told me this story before I got to it :-)!

Take care, Vikki.
--
Victoria Welch, WV9K/7
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to
fill the world with fools. --Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher
(1820-1903)


Re: Tail Stock Cam Lock Kit installed!

Victoria Welch
 

On Friday 30 March 2007, rancerupp wrote:
TO help contain the dry dust, put a magnet in a baggie and locate it
near your cutting.
Duhhh, I clean up the lathe when I do magnetic stuff with a magnet in a
sandwich baggie turned inside out, just turn it rightside out, seal
and toss.

Why didn't I think of that here?

Sometimes we're slow :-). Thanks for the pointer / refresher /
reminder :-)!

Also, on the cam lock, I did put a washer under the quill lock lever to
move it back a bit from the cam lock lever. It was getting in the way
after all.

Thanks & take care, Vikki.
--
Victoria Welch, WV9K/7
Some people are like a Slinky ... not really good for anything, but you
still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the
stairs. --Unknown


Re: When is a Sieg not a Sieg?

 

Hi Ian,

You referenced the 2 locknuts on the compound feed when you were
talking about the locking grub screw in the end of your leed screw
last week. I was mystified but figured I understood the leedscrew
bit so let the compound reference go through to the keeper. Now I
understand!

John



--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "steam4ian" <fosterscons@...>
wrote:

G'day all.

My machine may be a Real Bull, which may explain many of my posts!

More variations. The RBM machine (probably mine) has two lock nuts
on
the compound feed screw to provide adjustment of the bearing
backlash??? They bear on the dial and so effect that as well.
This also may explain why the 50 division dials I bought from LMS
don't fit. The internal diameter is 12mm whilst my feedscrew
shafts
are 10mm diameter.
The fix will not be difficult. For the cross slide I intend to
turn
up a bush, 10mm internal and 12mm external make a saw cut along
the
bush. I can cross drill and tap the dial 6mm (as per my existing
dial) and use a set screw to adjust the friction with the shaft.
For
the componud I can make a similar bush but with a collar at the
inboard end. The dial can also be cross drilled and also have a
recess for the collar of the bush bored out, the existing lock nut
can press against the outboard end of the bush.

Why the 50 div dials? because I work in metric and the Thou
divisions
are a pain, you have to calculate for evey adjustment.

Please join the game of "spot the difference."

One good turn deserves another.
Regards,
Ian


Re: When is a Sieg not a Sieg?

 

G'day all.

My machine may be a Real Bull, which may explain many of my posts!

More variations. The RBM machine (probably mine) has two lock nuts on
the compound feed screw to provide adjustment of the bearing
backlash??? They bear on the dial and so effect that as well.
This also may explain why the 50 division dials I bought from LMS
don't fit. The internal diameter is 12mm whilst my feedscrew shafts
are 10mm diameter.
The fix will not be difficult. For the cross slide I intend to turn
up a bush, 10mm internal and 12mm external make a saw cut along the
bush. I can cross drill and tap the dial 6mm (as per my existing
dial) and use a set screw to adjust the friction with the shaft. For
the componud I can make a similar bush but with a collar at the
inboard end. The dial can also be cross drilled and also have a
recess for the collar of the bush bored out, the existing lock nut
can press against the outboard end of the bush.

Why the 50 div dials? because I work in metric and the Thou divisions
are a pain, you have to calculate for evey adjustment.

Please join the game of "spot the difference."

One good turn deserves another.
Regards,
Ian


blown fuses

 

Hi all,
I have the 7x14 Mini Lathe with the digital readout. I had cause to
change over to the metal gears and put new bearings in as well. My big
question is now that I have it all back together the machine keeps
blowing the fuse when I turn on the power. The gear box is not stiff,
the motor and box turn over by hand and I color coded all the wires
before I pulled them out so I could make sure they went back in the
right place. The yellow light still comes on, even when the fuse is
blown. Have I inadvertedly blown some of the electronics in the board?
Regards,
Garry


Re: When is a Sieg not a Sieg?

 

G'day John.
I believe you may be right.
Thank you for your prompt response. Real Bull Machinery have a
functioning web site. They have variations on the 7x12 including a CNC
version.
They also have two small mills on offer place a range of accesssories.

HOW many clones are out there?

One good turn deserves another,
Regards,
Ian

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., johnm7@... wrote:

I believe your lathe is by Real Bull and not Seig.

Later..........John


***
See what's free at
.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Advice Sought for New User

 

G'day Nicipi.
I'm glad you are still with us. Your tolerances seem more generaous
than implied by your initial description.
Regarding the video/DVD. I am sure links from minilathe.com will find
something. I think Frank Hoose has an instructional vidoe. See also
minilathe.org.uk ,this guy has some good stuff. Try Googling "mini
lathe" and "DVD" or "video". Places like Plough Books and Camden
Books have books and I think you will find videos also, they handle
international orders well; try eBay also.

I look forward to hearing your progress.

One good turn deserves another.
Regards,
Ian

your--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "nicipi" <nicipi@...> wrote:

First, thanks for all your feedback Mike, John, Ian and Mike - you
guys have added a lot to my sense of what's involved in this
endeavor. I should at least clarify my tolerances.

The wall thickness can actually be anywhere between 16thou and
32thou, and every one that I make can be in that range (don't all
need to be identical); the only restriction here is that it still
be
flarable. Also, the thickness should be relative to the 0.437"
outer
diameter of the main part of the tube (the 0.437" can be plus/minus
5thou or maybe even 10thou). It is important that the
0.625" "outward rolled-like bead" be clean and rounded (a picture
would really help here - I have a photo and a schematic but don't
know how to share it with you guys). Otherwise, the surfaces don't
need to be perfect, so for example, as John points out, the inside
of
the tube can be done with just drill/bore (if I'm using the right
wording).

What I first need to do is make sure I understand the procedural
options here. Each of you guys have added something unique to try,
and I've been reading your instructions over and over. What's
just
now becoming a little clearer to me are things like what does the
tailstock do, what are the options for supporting the piece, what
are
centers, etc., and most importantly, what is a mandrel and how is
it
used (so that I can implement Mike's technique or variant thereof -
the mandrel seems to be a key here.) It certainly would be helpful
to see one of these machines up close and in action. I even looked
on youtube but only one video came up when I searched on "mini-
lathe"
and it wasn't very enlightening.

Nicipi


Re: When is a Sieg not a Sieg?

Jim RabidWolf
 

Older Homier and Cummins used 4 mm keyways.

Rabid
Uncle Rabid ( )
We Repair Electronic Speed Controllers
For Asian Mini Lathes and Mini Mills
"Just Crazy Enough To Get the Job Done"

----- Original Message -----
From: "steam4ian" <fosterscons@...>
To: <7x12minilathe@...>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 11:22 PM
Subject: [7x12minilathe] When is a Sieg not a Sieg?


G'day all.
I recently told you of my testing of the leadscrew mechincal fuse, it
works!. Yes, I damaged the 80T gear. Thankfully it is not beyond
recovery, so that it is now in the tuit basket.
I had previously purchased a spares kit from LMS and this morning dug
the replacement 80T gwear out of the bag. Surprise! the key way is
3mm wide not 4mm as for my lathe. I know my key is 4mm because a few
weeks ago I dropped my key in the swarf (on the floor I thought) No
amount of grovelling could find it so I grabbed a MS tent peg and
milled a new key; actually I used a file. BTW I found the key hiding
under the control box this morning.
I recently got an idler sleeve and key from LMS only to find tha the
key on that is 3mm as is the replacement LS key I purchased. The 57T
& 65T gears I purchased from LMS also have 3mm keyways whilst the
gears that came with the lathe have 4mm key ways. Thankfully a file
can address most of the problems. I can probably file a T profile key
for the sleeve, 3mm one side and 4mm the other.
The QUESTIONS:-
When and how did the change occur? My lathe has similar features to
the yellow Cummins, eg, square not H shaped saddle, way wipers, ball
oilers, nut on RH end of lead screw, etc. Some much earlier posts
commented that the yellow Cummins lathe was not made by Sieg.

Have others with yellow Cummins or Chestern Conquest lathes had the
same experience? The present Cummins lathe is blue and the pictures
don't show the features I refer to.

Have you found other dissimilarities?

Maybe Chris of LMS is lurking so he could comment?

Finally, why are Tuit baskets square??

One good turn deserves another.
Regards.
Ian



Be sure to check out for small mills and lathes.
Yahoo! Groups Links





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.22/739 - Release Date: 3/29/2007 1:36 PM


When is a Sieg not a Sieg?

 

G'day all.
I recently told you of my testing of the leadscrew mechincal fuse, it
works!. Yes, I damaged the 80T gear. Thankfully it is not beyond
recovery, so that it is now in the tuit basket.
I had previously purchased a spares kit from LMS and this morning dug
the replacement 80T gwear out of the bag. Surprise! the key way is
3mm wide not 4mm as for my lathe. I know my key is 4mm because a few
weeks ago I dropped my key in the swarf (on the floor I thought) No
amount of grovelling could find it so I grabbed a MS tent peg and
milled a new key; actually I used a file. BTW I found the key hiding
under the control box this morning.
I recently got an idler sleeve and key from LMS only to find tha the
key on that is 3mm as is the replacement LS key I purchased. The 57T
& 65T gears I purchased from LMS also have 3mm keyways whilst the
gears that came with the lathe have 4mm key ways. Thankfully a file
can address most of the problems. I can probably file a T profile key
for the sleeve, 3mm one side and 4mm the other.
The QUESTIONS:-
When and how did the change occur? My lathe has similar features to
the yellow Cummins, eg, square not H shaped saddle, way wipers, ball
oilers, nut on RH end of lead screw, etc. Some much earlier posts
commented that the yellow Cummins lathe was not made by Sieg.

Have others with yellow Cummins or Chestern Conquest lathes had the
same experience? The present Cummins lathe is blue and the pictures
don't show the features I refer to.

Have you found other dissimilarities?

Maybe Chris of LMS is lurking so he could comment?

Finally, why are Tuit baskets square??

One good turn deserves another.
Regards.
Ian


Re: Advice Sought for New User

Mike Payson
 

Hi Nicipi,

I'm certainly not an expert. I'm only a bit more advanced then you
are. It sounds like what you want to do should be well within the
capabilities of the lathe. It might take you several tries to get the
process down, but the nice thing about doing a bunch of the same part
is you have plenty of opportunity to practice.

FWIW, you might want to start with some tubing (such as
)
instead of rod stock. (Or maybe not, like I said, I'm a newbie too...)

Mike

On 3/30/07, nicipi <nicipi@...> wrote:
First, thanks for all your feedback Mike, John, Ian and Mike - you
guys have added a lot to my sense of what's involved in this
endeavor. I should at least clarify my tolerances.

The wall thickness can actually be anywhere between 16thou and
32thou, and every one that I make can be in that range (don't all
need to be identical); the only restriction here is that it still be
flarable. Also, the thickness should be relative to the 0.437" outer
diameter of the main part of the tube (the 0.437" can be plus/minus
5thou or maybe even 10thou). It is important that the
0.625" "outward rolled-like bead" be clean and rounded (a picture
would really help here - I have a photo and a schematic but don't
know how to share it with you guys). Otherwise, the surfaces don't
need to be perfect, so for example, as John points out, the inside of
the tube can be done with just drill/bore (if I'm using the right
wording).

What I first need to do is make sure I understand the procedural
options here. Each of you guys have added something unique to try,
and I've been reading your instructions over and over. What's just
now becoming a little clearer to me are things like what does the
tailstock do, what are the options for supporting the piece, what are
centers, etc., and most importantly, what is a mandrel and how is it
used (so that I can implement Mike's technique or variant thereof -
the mandrel seems to be a key here.) It certainly would be helpful
to see one of these machines up close and in action. I even looked
on youtube but only one video came up when I searched on "mini-lathe"
and it wasn't very enlightening.

Nicipi




Be sure to check out for small mills and lathes.
Yahoo! Groups Links




Re: Tool post mods by "Driggars"

Clint D
 

Ron

That is actually Rance's tool post mods, I just uploaded the pix for him. so, Rance gets the credit, no matter how much I would love to receive it 8-)

Clint


Ronald Durbin wrote:

Hi, Clint. I just saw your drawings of the tool post modification in the photos section. I have done this with a smaller post, except that I used set screws (or grub screws, as our British brothers and sisters call them) comming up from the bottom. To adjust, just undo the retaining nut on top, lift up the post, back off the top screw slightly, engage (run further in) the bottom screw tightly, and replace the post as per normal. This sometimes take a few tries, but once the height is achieved, all is well. Great drawings, by the way!. Ron.



Be sure to check out for small mills and lathes. Yahoo! Groups Links





Re: Advice Sought for New User

 

First, thanks for all your feedback Mike, John, Ian and Mike - you
guys have added a lot to my sense of what's involved in this
endeavor. I should at least clarify my tolerances.

The wall thickness can actually be anywhere between 16thou and
32thou, and every one that I make can be in that range (don't all
need to be identical); the only restriction here is that it still be
flarable. Also, the thickness should be relative to the 0.437" outer
diameter of the main part of the tube (the 0.437" can be plus/minus
5thou or maybe even 10thou). It is important that the
0.625" "outward rolled-like bead" be clean and rounded (a picture
would really help here - I have a photo and a schematic but don't
know how to share it with you guys). Otherwise, the surfaces don't
need to be perfect, so for example, as John points out, the inside of
the tube can be done with just drill/bore (if I'm using the right
wording).

What I first need to do is make sure I understand the procedural
options here. Each of you guys have added something unique to try,
and I've been reading your instructions over and over. What's just
now becoming a little clearer to me are things like what does the
tailstock do, what are the options for supporting the piece, what are
centers, etc., and most importantly, what is a mandrel and how is it
used (so that I can implement Mike's technique or variant thereof -
the mandrel seems to be a key here.) It certainly would be helpful
to see one of these machines up close and in action. I even looked
on youtube but only one video came up when I searched on "mini-lathe"
and it wasn't very enlightening.

Nicipi


Re: Advice Sought for New User

 

It's well within the lathe's capabilities. The tricky part is going
to be working with the thin wall without tearing or distorting the
piece. Since it's only 1" long, I'd make it in one chucking, parting
the finished piece off of a length of stock. Rather than flaring it
after it's made into a tube, consider machining the flare while it's
made into tubing.

6 jaw chucks are ideal for working thin walled tubular pieces, the
clamping force is distributed over more area than with a 3 jaw. For
tubular work, collets are also convenient. Since they distribute the
clamping forces over even more area, they're better than a jawed
chuck. They're also more accurate than most chucks. You can solve
the rechucking problem by making an adjustable backplate for the
chuck, ideal with a 4" chuck, since you need a separate backplate to
mount it.

Roy

--- In 7x12minilathe@..., "nicipi" <nicipi@...> wrote:


Hi,

I am thinking about bying a Mini-Lath (like the one shown on
mini-lathe.com). Among many reasons, the main reason is to make a
part
that is essentially a tube (aluminum alloy 6061) that has an outside
diameter of 0.437 inches and a wall thickness of 0.016 inches. I
want
to be able to flare the end when I'm finished, so my first question
is,
by milling the aluminum on a mini-lathe, will that ruin the temper
of
the alloy such that it can't be flared afterward? My second
question
is this: I also want to start from a stock of outside diameter of
0.625
inches, reason being that I want one end (not to be flared) to be
left
with a "bead" of a diameter 0.625 inches. Can these lathes do this
kind
of thing, that is, make tube that one would get as if you had a
machine
that form an "outward rolled end"?


Re: When is a Sieg not a Sieg?

 

I believe your lathe is by Real Bull and not Seig.

Later..........John


***
See what's free at
.


Re: Advice Sought for New User

 

G'day nicipi.
You have some sound adice from Mike & John. The limitation to what
you want to do will be the strength of the material and your skill. I
take it by your question that you may not have used a lathe before.
Having a specific project is a great excuse for increasing your
retinue of tools, I should know, my shop is full of them!
If you have this project as an excuse to buy a lathe which you've
always wanted, then go ahead. Be prepared to spend time gaining and
improving your skill, this is the best part, very good for your self
esteem. IMHO for every hour spent improving the lathe to get better
outcomes, 10 hours will be spent improving your personal skills. The
scrap bucket is a great invention!

The problems you will face with what you propose include:
Distortion of the 16thou walls of the tube as you take the final cut,
the tube wall may even tear.
If made from tube then distortion in the 3 jaw chuck.
Mike's proposal with the mandrell will help over come these problems.
For me I would make the part out of bar and drill and bore the hole
to depth. Insert a mandell in the outer end to support the work on
the tailstock then turn down to the diamemters you require.
You will have to experiment; it may be better turning the 0.625"
diameter at the TS end. Also doing the reduction of diameter to the
16thou wall thichness may be better as one full depth cut with a sery
slow feed rate.

TOLERANCE: No! I'm not talking about putting up with my comments!
No machined part is every exactly the same dimension, CNC stuff may
be close, but never identical. You have given us dimensions but have
not said what the tolerances are. That is, the range of internal
diameter, wall thickness, collar diameter and lengths. Be warned.
IMHO, as a newbie, you will be lucky to get within 3thou on any
dimension.

By now you will have either decided this is not for you or become
excited at the prospect of increasing the range of your skills.

As an alternative I am sure there are a number of skilled minilathe
owners with some time to spend to make or try to make these parts for
you for some recompence.

As I say.
One good turn deserves another.
Regards,
Ian


Tool post mods by "Driggars"

 

Hi, Clint. I just saw your drawings of the tool post modification in
the photos section. I have done this with a smaller post, except that
I used set screws (or grub screws, as our British brothers and sisters
call them) comming up from the bottom. To adjust, just undo the
retaining nut on top, lift up the post, back off the top screw
slightly, engage (run further in) the bottom screw tightly, and
replace the post as per normal. This sometimes take a few tries, but
once the height is achieved, all is well. Great drawings, by the way!.
Ron.