Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Board of Zoning and Adjustment case 20467, 232 10th St SE
Peter, thanks for bringing this up for discussion. We are concerned not only about the pop-up, but the pop-back--the plans call for building an extension that will take up most of the back yard. Aside from all the aesthetic problems of pop-ups, building essentially a two-family rental property creates many problems. Neighbors will be living in tunnels with views and light blocked. Given property values, this will open the door to others to be incentivized to build big rentals in their backyard too. In the long term, this will change the character of the neighborhood, and owners who live in their houses will be at a disadvantage. Are these essentially landlords starting to act as developers? I have no objection to fixing up a deteriorated property within the existing rules. But the big changes that come with these variances should involve the neighborhood. At very least, neighbors should be aware of them. All best, Michael (236 10th) On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 8:06 PM Peter H. Mott <peterhmott@...> wrote: Good evening neighbors! |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss