Reading research, asking questions
Hello everyone, I have written a short page with a very very very brief introduction to research on esotericism, especially anthroposophy. I have combined this with an invitation to ask questions.
By
Finnef
·
#34708
·
|
Re: New paper by Martin Rawson
Thank you Eeva!
By
Finnef
·
#34707
·
|
Re: New paper by Martin Rawson
Finn wrote: Thank you Kokanje! Honestly, I'm more interested in what anthroposophy is for you rather than ChatGPT. I think it's fair if people who have no reverence for anthroposophy, don't believe in
By
Rengazen@...
·
#34706
·
|
Re: New paper by Martin Rawson
Thank you Kokanje! Honestly, I'm more interested in what anthroposophy is for you rather than ChatGPT. I think it's fair if people who have no reverence for anthroposophy, don't believe in it, aren't
By
Finnef
·
#34705
·
|
Re: New paper by Martin Rawson
Just after I pushed the send button, I saw this example of an oxymoron: ¡®cruel kindness¡¯ That could also be a definition of anthroposophy for me. greetings, Kokanje
By
Kokanje
·
#34704
·
|
Re: New paper by Martin Rawson
Finn, I know your question is sincere and hopefully someone can ever give you a definitive answer that is not debatable (although I doubt it). I would say: anthroposophy is what you get when you base
By
Kokanje
·
#34703
·
|
Re: New paper by Martin Rawson
Hello all, The question "what is anthroposophy?" as Rawson discusses it in his text has been on my mind for a while. On the one hand, there are Waldorf anthroposophists who are sure that anthroposophy
By
Finnef
·
#34702
·
|
Re: New paper by Martin Rawson
Hi Eeva, Thank you for sharing this. I already passed it on. I was triggered by the first part on how to correctly study and interpret Steiner¡¯s words and works. So I put the passage in ChatGPT and
By
Kokanje
·
#34701
·
|
Re: New paper by Martin Rawson
Spoiler (how Rawson's Text ends): "The delineation presented here, if taken up, would prevent no individual from deepening their understanding of Anthroposophy to whatever level they are capable of.
By
Finnef
·
#34700
·
|
Re: New paper by Martin Rawson
Hello Eeva, Thanks for the hint to the paper by Rawson. I have another link.
By
Finnef
·
#34699
·
|
Re: New paper by Martin Rawson
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 10:08 PM, Eeva wrote: > > (PDF) Waldorf Working Papers No. 8.2. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385301973_Waldorf_Working_Papers_No_82 > [accessed Nov
By
Rengazen@...
·
#34698
·
|
New paper by Martin Rawson
The habit of using the collected works as an encyclopedia, or as a source of suitable quotations to embellish ¡®sermons¡¯, without contextualizing the words chosen, is not a serious way of working.
By
Rengazen@...
·
#34697
·
|
Lea's new column
Another incisive column by Lea in today's taz: https://taz.de/Nach-Diphtherie-Fall-in-Berlin/!6043893/
By
Peter Staudenmaier
·
#34696
·
|
Re: Anthroposophy and the history of Fascism
Hello, hello, I found and ordered a copy of Scaligeros Urachhaus-book "Die Logik als Widersacher des Menschen". I'm particularly curious on what I'll read in the introduction Michael Kirn wrote for
By
Finnef
·
#34695
·
|
Re: Steiner and the current political right
Hi Walden, about the ¡®f¡¯: I realized recently, but the conversation with StAIner (a new name for him?) dates from before. I¡¯m sure I could make AI Steiner even more realistic, (syntaxis could be
By
Kokanje
·
#34694
·
|
Re: Steiner and the current political right
Hi Kokanje, I enjoy witnessing your curiosity in action. This is a fascinating example. Btw, I doubt AI Steiner really minds, but it¡¯s Rudolf with an F. In any case, your curiosity begs even more:
By
awaldenpond
·
#34693
·
|
Re: Steiner and the current political right
Hi Geoffrey, no article, but I asked ChatGPT, roleplaying as Steiner a while back. I had to nudge him a bit, but in the end he endorsed Harris. Here¡¯s the conversation (for what it¡¯s worth). I¡¯m
By
Kokanje
·
#34692
·
|
Re: Steiner and the current political right
Hello, Has anyone seen or written an article on how RS would vote in the US Presidential election? Are there justifications for supporting Trump? [email protected]> wrote:
By
Geoffrey Gogan
·
#34691
·
|
Re: Anthroposophy and the history of Fascism
Finn, It must be a mistake or an oversight ;-) Greetings, Kokanje
By
Kokanje
·
#34690
·
|
Re: Anthroposophy and the history of Fascism
These sentences have been omitted from the AnthroWiki: - "During the period of Italian fascism ( https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italienischer_Faschismus ) , he wrote racist (
By
Finnef
·
#34689
·
|