开云体育

Hi Joe, At least one guy is hearing you! I think it's a great idea but I don't know who the owner of this group is. Charlie [testdrivendevelopment] <testdrivendevelopment@...> wrote:

Hi, folks. My recent messages are either not being delivered or are slow to be delivered, so I can't tell whether anyone is hearing me. :) Please do these two things: 1. Make me an owner of this

Please give me owner permissions for this group. I don't seem to have it already and it would make the transfer simpler for everyone. Thanks!

Please give me owner permission if I don't already have it. Thanks!

I’m all for it. Transfer away! testdrivendevelopment@...> wrote: -- Thanks, Roy Osherove http://osherove.com http://elasticleadership.com

What did you decide to do? I have already transfered the extremeprogramming group over. I could start a transfer for this group, too, if I receive owner permission here. @jbrains

Hi Carlos, Glad to have you on board! There are some instructions on how to transfer. /yahootransfer The crux of the matter is finding a moderator of this group who can make the

Great initiative Douglas! This group taught me so much when I was learning TDD, I'd like to give back. Please let me know how can I contribute to the migration, what's your plan? Thank you :-)

Hi All! I hear that Yahoo Groups are to be discontinued. There is work afoot over in extremeprogramming@... to move the archive the groups.io. There's a cost of $220 for a year's premium

If you have not taken the opportunity to explore JUnit 5... here is fifteen minute "QuickStart"! http://pedcentral.com/justify/justify-quickstart

I see a couple of ideas here: Mocking framework in UWP Apps http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33242211/mocking-framework-in-uwp-apps

Hello group. I’ve been really wanting to teach my self UWP since I comfortable with WPF. Strangely enough (to some people) the biggest hurdle for me learning is that I can’t practice TDD when

The language can have a big impact though. I’m working in Go right now. Message passing is included in the language as channels, and there are just a few idioms you have to know to do it pretty

[testdrivendevelopment] <testdrivendevelopment@...> wrote: I have a colleague who tried to go that route, I agree, not pretty. But it sounds like you're talking more about decoupling

Hi John, all, trigger _every_ I've seen several test suites where people force execution order on multithreaded SUTs (using test-only synchronization points), effectively creating a programmatic

parallelism to the runner. Part of me says, "Any code that depends on the exact performance of the scheduler, the load the number of CPU's, .... is flaky, I want my tests to break and tell me so."

Hi John, I like your list of ideas, but I take a small exception with your comment about running tests on multiple threads. I agree that it sometimes introduces non-deterministic results, but that's

Things I do to handle this.... * Benchmark. Every build spits out an order list of how long each test took. Attack the long ones first. * Parallelism via Processes not threads. Multithreaded unit

The soon to be released Justify Open Source project supporting rule-based CDI JUnit testing is now briefly documented for System Engineers at http://pedcentral.com/justify/

Joen, What language(s) and platform are you working with? Dave... [testdrivendevelopment] <testdrivendevelopment@...> wrote: