¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Testing a monolitic band filter (3 pins)


 

Hello,

the story:
I made a homemade Ubitx. The reception seemed too weak, I tested the different stages and wondered if the 45 MHZ band filter was well centered and rated a good bandwidth (minimum 15 Khz)
if I test the filter with a generator I have the maximum at 45.007300Mhz
I am at 50% of the incoming signal (-3db) at 45.008600 and 45.006050
which will theoretically make a width of 2550 htz (!) no good(?)
Filter is a motorola 20J26 --> unable to find documentation
here on ebay (Come from US to france)!

As I have a nanovna, I thought I would test it with this tool.
So I did a montage based on the PJ case model. PDF file.
the filter is between 2 toroids, each primary connected to the Nano
i have this curve (see file)
more surprising when looking this video from 2mn30 #554 NANOVNA Measuring Various Bandpass Filters - YouTube

And some French ham radio, tell me that a good band filter must have at minimun two band filter like this (see file)

here the story on Ubitx forum
/g/BITX20/topic/calibration_filters/89337641?p=Created%2C%2C%2C20%2C1%2C40%2C0%3A%3Arecentpostdate%2Fsticky%2C%2C%2C20%2C2%2C0%2C89337641%2Cprevid%25253D1649866481766021915%2Cnextid%25253D1649175119081743046&jump=1

So I am lost!
My questions: Does anyone have a way to find the doc of this motorola filter?
How well to test it on a Nano?
The curve does not appear to reflect reality (????)

thank you for your answers and hope you were clear

cdt


 

Your first image illustrates the measured through amplitude response of the
filter. It indicates a severely over-coupled set of resonators. I do mean
severely over-coupled!! Coupling would be determined by L2 and L3 and the
capacitor between them. I would adjust all three of these components until
you obtain a relatively flat response. I'd start with the coupling
capacitor - less capacitance. However, based on your initial over-coupled
result, I doubt you will obtain the desired 15 kHz flat response.

Also check the resonant frequency of L1 through L4 and associated variable
capacitors. Be sure they are close to 45 MHz. Values are not given on the
schematic of the circuit in which the resonators are embedded. Values are
needed for better evaluation. The NANOs are capable of measuring these
components. The paper presenting a circuit for testing these resonators
does not allow for any adjustments nor confirming it is aimed at 45 MHz.
Far too many unknowns. All the elements need to be known before an
intelligent evaluation of the resonators can be made.

I'd also suggest modelling the circuit on something like LTSpice and look
at the resulting input/output impedances of the network. The NANOs are all
designed to work with 50-ohm characteristic system impedance.

Dave - W?LEV

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 5:43 PM Gerard <kabupos@...> wrote:

Hello,

the story:
I made a homemade Ubitx. The reception seemed too weak, I tested the
different stages and wondered if the 45 MHZ band filter was well centered
and rated a good bandwidth (minimum 15 Khz)
if I test the filter with a generator I have the maximum at 45.007300Mhz
I am at 50% of the incoming signal (-3db) at 45.008600 and 45.006050
which will theoretically make a width of 2550 htz (!) no good(?)
Filter is a motorola 20J26 --> unable to find documentation
here on ebay (Come from US to france)!


As I have a nanovna, I thought I would test it with this tool.
So I did a montage based on the PJ case model. PDF file.
the filter is between 2 toroids, each primary connected to the Nano
i have this curve (see file)
more surprising when looking this video from 2mn30 #554 NANOVNA
Measuring Various Bandpass Filters - YouTube

And some French ham radio, tell me that a good band filter must have at
minimun two band filter like this (see file)

here the story on Ubitx forum

/g/BITX20/topic/calibration_filters/89337641?p=Created%2C%2C%2C20%2C1%2C40%2C0%3A%3Arecentpostdate%2Fsticky%2C%2C%2C20%2C2%2C0%2C89337641%2Cprevid%25253D1649866481766021915%2Cnextid%25253D1649175119081743046&jump=1

So I am lost!
My questions: Does anyone have a way to find the doc of this motorola
filter?
How well to test it on a Nano?
The curve does not appear to reflect reality (????)

thank you for your answers and hope you were clear

cdt











--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*


 

You MUST test this filter in a circuit that matches the 50 ohm of the nanoVNA with the required impedance of the filter. When you connected it in a circuit as described in the Crystal Measuring Adapter PDF, the impedance presented to the filter device is very low, but a little higher than just connecting directly as done in the video. I saw someone in a uBITX.io group message suggesting the impedance should be around 650 ohms and another suggesting 1500 ohms. On-line, I located a company that makes something similar (ecsxtal.com) the ECS-45K15A, specified as 15 kHz BW, 650 ohms in parallel with 5.0 pF. For a quick test, I suggest connecting a 600 ohm resistor between each of the CH0 output and one side of the filter and another 600 ohm between the other side of the filter and CH1. For the required parallel capacitance, connect a 5 pF between each of the filter input and output to ground. The extra resistors will result in about 28.3 dB excess loss over the filter loss between CH0 and CH1, but the filter shape will be correct. If the curve doesn't meet your expectations, you can try adjusting the resistors and capacitors to see if you can improve the result (keep the two resistors the same and also the two capacitors).

After you have seen what the filter passband looks like and it is fine tuned, you should check it "in circuit" in your uBITX. Do this by disconnecting the filter circuit from the other sections of your unit. That is, disconnect the junction of C210 and C221 from T4 and connect them to CH0, then disconnect the junction of C216 and L5 from R17 and C20 and connect them to CH1. now you can sweep the filter with its matching components without interaction with the rest of the circuit. Without the 600 ohm resistors, it won't have the 28.3 dB excess loss of the previous setup, it should only be a few dB. If it doesn't look the same as the "out of circuit" test above, experiment with adjusting L5 = L7, C212 = C214 to see if better results can be obtained.

It doesn't seem to me that you need two filters for the uBITX, since the second filter will only slightly improve the performance (the ECS website specification suggests that adding another filter section will only improve the rejection at +/-910 kHz by 10 dB, from 70 dB to 80 dB).

I happen to have a couple of these 20J26 filters that I got in a 100 piece surplus xtal assortment, so maybe next week I can try out my own suggestions.


 

Hello,

Thank you for your expertise.
I¡¯ll test as soon as I can
I sent your answers on the forum Ubitx for those who follow my investigations
cdt


 

The fixture you have is for testing individual crystals, NOT for testing crystal filters. Loading the filter with 12.5 ohms as you have done will give you a god-awful passband response, as you have already seen. I would expect that a filter of that bandwidth at that frequency would have a required terminating impedance in the neighborhood of 1000 ohms. Sweep the filter with proper terminating impedances and it will look a lot more like you would expect.


 

Also, looking at the roofing filter schematic you posted, I see that the input and output coils are 14 turns, with a 2 turn link. The impedance ratio would be the square of the turns ratio, or 7 squared = 49. Multiplying the input impedance of 50 ohms times 49 gives us 2450 ohms, a fair distance from the 1000 ohms I guesstimated, but still a heck of a lot closer than 12.5 ohms!


 

Hello Dave and all,

I put together a small model that makes exactly the assembly of the 45MHZ filter part of the Ubitx.
The only difference is to have 2 variable capacitor (36 pf max I think) instead of 22pf fixed.
here is the best result when playing with the 2 capacitors.
The dish is better by 20 db, but not yet perfect, but the slope is less steep (loss of 20db)
I feel like both capacitors are all over the place.
I will repeat tests by adding 2 capacitors in// of 22PF

your opinion

cdt


 

1) Your filter is still over-coupled.
2) Resistors have no place in a filter of this nature.
3) Please include values of your lumped components in schematics.
4) Keep the variable capacitors.
5) Decrease the value of the coupling capacitor between the resonators.
6) For matching in/out of your filter, the toroidal transformers are all
you need.
7) Confirm the ferrite material you are using is appropriate for 45 MHz.
43 material is appropriate for 45 MHz.

SUGGESTION: Become cozy and comfortable with ELSIE. It's a freeware
filter design application.



Spend a few hours or a day or two playing with various filters using this
app. That will give you a better understanding of what you are attempting
to accomplish.

Dave - W?LEV

On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 5:27 PM Gerard <kabupos@...> wrote:

Hello Dave and all,

I put together a small model that makes exactly the assembly of the 45MHZ
filter part of the Ubitx.
The only difference is to have 2 variable capacitor (36 pf max I think)
instead of 22pf fixed.
here is the best result when playing with the 2 capacitors.
The dish is better by 20 db, but not yet perfect, but the slope is less
steep (loss of 20db)
I feel like both capacitors are all over the place.
I will repeat tests by adding 2 capacitors in// of 22PF

your opinion

cdt





--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*


 

On 4/15/22 10:56 AM, W0LEV wrote:
1) Your filter is still over-coupled.
2) Resistors have no place in a filter of this nature.
3) Please include values of your lumped components in schematics.
4) Keep the variable capacitors.
5) Decrease the value of the coupling capacitor between the resonators.
6) For matching in/out of your filter, the toroidal transformers are all
you need.
7) Confirm the ferrite material you are using is appropriate for 45 MHz.
43 material is appropriate for 45 MHz.

SUGGESTION: Become cozy and comfortable with ELSIE. It's a freeware
filter design application.



Spend a few hours or a day or two playing with various filters using this
app. That will give you a better understanding of what you are attempting
to accomplish.

Dave - W?LEV

+1 for Elsie - It's great and fast. It will export to a SPICE file, if you like, too.? (Windows only, though - it will run in a VM on a Mac or Linux)


 

Hello Dave,

Hello Dave W0LEV, I only followed the instructions of Dave W6OQ. He asked me to test this filter in the configuration of a Ubitx. That is what I did. Several people asked for resistance.
So I took a part of the Ubitx diagram for the band filter part and tried to test it.
It is sold like that and it seems to work because in the US you are many to use it.
Now I can¡¯t find the datasheet of this Motorola 20J26 filter, I thought that addressing a US forum might help to find. There are not many Motorola alumni.
Now I can also stop busting my head with this and foolishly buy new filters
So I should conclude that on this forum, no one can give a band filter test pattern for a nanovna
What¡¯s the point of equipping?
Have a nice day
cdt


 

I also tried to locate data for your Motorola resonator. I could not.
Likely it's a custom part Mot. used in one or several of their products.

I could run a quick BPF filter S21 plot, but that would not teach
anything. Playing with ELSIE is highly educational, doesn't require
soldering, and is quite user friendly. It's a wonderful teaching and
learning tool.

I'll attach a screen capture of a 20 MHz BPF I designed in ELSIE for other
purposes just to illustrate the target general pass characteristics of your
filter. Of course, it's for a different frequency, but this is how it
should look. See the attachment.

Dave - W?LEV

On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 7:10 PM Gerard <kabupos@...> wrote:

Hello Dave,

Hello Dave W0LEV, I only followed the instructions of Dave W6OQ. He asked
me to test this filter in the configuration of a Ubitx. That is what I did.
Several people asked for resistance.
So I took a part of the Ubitx diagram for the band filter part and tried
to test it.
It is sold like that and it seems to work because in the US you are many
to use it.
Now I can¡¯t find the datasheet of this Motorola 20J26 filter, I thought
that addressing a US forum might help to find. There are not many Motorola
alumni.
Now I can also stop busting my head with this and foolishly buy new filters
So I should conclude that on this forum, no one can give a band filter
test pattern for a nanovna
What¡¯s the point of equipping?
Have a nice day
cdt





--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*


 

Dave,

Thank you for your response
I would test it tomorrow, because here it is already the beginning of the night.
I had downloaded this software, but not tested yet.
It is true that there are many software programs and that we cannot control them all.
I¡¯ve been interested in radio for a short time, much like anyone who can do it with a little more time after their career.
The subject is vast and we learn and discover every day.
Amazing what you can do with a coil and a capacitor.

See you soon.
thank you for your help
cdt


 

On 2022-04-15 12:10:-0700, you wrote:
So I should conclude that on this forum, no one can give a band filter test pattern for a nanovna
Not really my strength, so I was lurking to learn. But /this/ filter is pretty much right out of the mfg notes. Measured on NanoVNA-F this month, and if my notes are correct, using NanoVNA-App-v1.1.208 x86. Does this fit the bill?

~R~
72/73 de Rich NE1EE
The Dusty Key
On the banks of the Piscataqua


 

Hello Rich and others

Thank you for your response
The good thing is that your PDF gives a measurement diagram.
As said, I never found the documentation of this Motorola filter.
I¡¯ll look in my inventory if I find one, I know I have ceramics on an old satellite decoder and do a test to see the curve.
I wondered, if I use the same circuit with an input generator from 44.8 to 45.1 Mhz and I draw a curve in relation to injected signal, output signal would be a solution (?) by monitoring that the injected signal is always the same voltage. ---> Ratio input/output curve.
In the worst case there are some on Ebay, but it¡¯s a long time to have them from China, if came US or Greece some shipping costs
Unless a good soul can send me two, from Europ will be the ideal.
there are also special shops but high shipping costs or minimum shopping of €50 for free shipping

cdt


 

If the resonator is a ceramic resonator like the 10.7 MHz filters used for
WBFM, they are usually spec'ed to be embedded in a 300-ohm system. In a
lossy manner, that's what the 300-ohm resistor is on the input side of the
filter. A more appropriate method of matching to that 300-ohm resistance
in a relatively lossless manner is either with an appropriate RF
transformer (that's why I asked about the ferrite material in a previous
email) or the use of an emitter / source follower with 300-ohm non-bypassed
emitter / source resistor.

Dave - W?LEV

On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 8:51 AM Gerard <kabupos@...> wrote:

Hello Rich and others

Thank you for your response
The good thing is that your PDF gives a measurement diagram.
As said, I never found the documentation of this Motorola filter.
I¡¯ll look in my inventory if I find one, I know I have ceramics on an old
satellite decoder and do a test to see the curve.
I wondered, if I use the same circuit with an input generator from 44.8 to
45.1 Mhz and I draw a curve in relation to injected signal, output signal
would be a solution (?) by monitoring that the injected signal is always
the same voltage. ---> Ratio input/output curve.
In the worst case there are some on Ebay, but it¡¯s a long time to have
them from China, if came US or Greece some shipping costs
Unless a good soul can send me two, from Europ will be the ideal.
there are also special shops but high shipping costs or minimum shopping
of €50 for free shipping

cdt





--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*


 

Hello Dave and all

I didn¡¯t say it was a ceramic filter. I was actually talking about a test I could do with possibly recovering a ceramic filter on an old sattellite decoder
Only to see the form of curve.
If you look the sch¨¦matic of the Ubitx, there are 2 coils of 720Nh
it's give 200 ohm resistor value at 45 MHZ.
I made a measurement directly on the Ubitx with a generator and an oscilloscope
This curiously gives a dish from 44.996000 to 45.004000. which would give a dish of 8Khz and a center frequency at 45Mhz. (I am lucky?)
with the curvature one can imagine falling to about 15Khz of bandwidth.
I checked my generator at frequency, it¡¯s good at a few hertz.
Then the measurement may not be in the standards but gives an indication.
On a Ubitx the filter is a "WTL 69 45,000"
mine's
So my idea is to modify the ubitx software and set the clock values in this direction
USB --> 57003400. LSB--> 33010400 with BFO 11996500 for SSB filter.
But new story with pb's of compilation
see here
:/g/BITX20/topic/help_programming_arduino/90507972?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate/sticky,,,20,2,0,90507972,previd%3D1650166014008181026,nextid%3D1649404434270126304&previd=1650166014008181026&nextid=1649404434270126304
cdt


 

The schematic from the ubitx of the filter in question follows:

[image: image.png]

This is embedded in a 50-ohm system according to the complete schematic.
So, for your test fixture, I would not change anything. C210 and C216 show
"0" which I presume means "no load" or nothing. Leave them out. C211 and
C215 are just DC blocks so 0.1 ?F is appropriate. For C212 and C214, I'd
install something like a 3 to 30 pF variable set about 80% to 90% of the
max to start with. For L5 and L7, don't bother with ferrite coils from
some "recipe". Instead of that, use an air wound inductor: Diameter =
0.5-inches, length = 1.0 inch, = number of turns = 12. That should pretty
much replicate what is in the schematic of the ubitx. Your 50-ohm
impedance of the NANOVNA is appropriate for a through measurement (after a
complete cal. of the NANOVNA). Test only one resonator at a time. Once
you are satisfied with that result, add the second with a small ( several
pF) coupling capacitor) or, better yet, a 3 - 30 pF variable.

Dave - W?LEV

On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 9:09 AM Gerard <kabupos@...> wrote:

Hello Dave and all

I didn¡¯t say it was a ceramic filter. I was actually talking about a test
I could do with possibly recovering a ceramic filter on an old sattellite
decoder
Only to see the form of curve.
If you look the sch¨¦matic of the Ubitx, there are 2 coils of 720Nh

it's give 200 ohm resistor value at 45 MHZ.
I made a measurement directly on the Ubitx with a generator and an
oscilloscope
This curiously gives a dish from 44.996000 to 45.004000. which would give
a dish of 8Khz and a center frequency at 45Mhz. (I am lucky?)
with the curvature one can imagine falling to about 15Khz of bandwidth.
I checked my generator at frequency, it¡¯s good at a few hertz.
Then the measurement may not be in the standards but gives an indication.
On a Ubitx the filter is a "WTL 69 45,000"
mine's

So my idea is to modify the ubitx software and set the clock values in
this direction
USB --> 57003400. LSB--> 33010400 with BFO 11996500 for SSB filter.
But new story with pb's of compilation
see here
:
/g/BITX20/topic/help_programming_arduino/90507972?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate/sticky,,,20,2,0,90507972,previd%3D1650166014008181026,nextid%3D1649404434270126304&previd=1650166014008181026&nextid=1649404434270126304
cdt





--
*Dave - W?LEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*


 

L5 and L7 are actually specified to be wound with a specific number of turns on a T30-6 toroid. The coils work with the capacitors to form an impedance matching circuit that steps the 50 Ohms up to some higher impedance that the monolithic xtal filter likes. The capacitor also supplies a few left over pF that parallel loads the two resonators on the xtal blank to 45 MHz. From the measured curve shown before, with the big dip in the middle, I believe that the step up ratio of the matching circuit is too high, making the loaded Q of the of the filter too high. Possibly the original specified monolithic xtal filter worked well with the matching components shown on the schematic and the surplus part from Motorola just wants something different.


 

Hello "the" Dave,

On the Ubitx forum, a friend tell me the reference of the filter on an original unitx. It's "WTL 69 45,000"
I couldn¡¯t find the datasheet on the internet.
On E.. I find:



There are also some on Digikey, farnell etc, but the cost of transport is high 18€, except for a minimum purchase of 50€
The weird thing is, I did a measurement directly to the oscilloscope out of the filter and injected a signal into its input with a generator.
I have a nice "flat" from 44.996000 to 45.004000 (or 8Khz) and battery centered at 45MHZ!
It drops to the extremities of these frequencies, then nothing.
So that leaves about 15 Khz of band.
The test with nano, will give at the extremities, 44.995130 and 45008089, with a center (Despite the curvature down) of 45.002036.( Or 13Khz of bandwidth).
I don¡¯t know why I have these two different types of behavior.

Then when we look at this, there seems to be only one capacitor and 2 filters (3 welds below) and 2 toroids, unless 2 capacitors are hidden.
Unable to read references


Dave, tu as dit que es Motorola 20J26 pour faire un test ¨¦ventuel
Mes toroids sont bien des T50 /6 (yellow)

cdt


 

Hello,
Making a model reproducing the 45MHZ pass filter of the ubitx (but with variables capacitors) and connecting at each end a toroid transformer I managed to improve the tracing of my filter.
Or a slightly flatter shape at -2db and 16.15 khtz width at -3db with best adjust of capacitor

If I want a perfect dish, is there a manipulation to do? I was wondering if the middle point must be absolutely connected to the ground, or if there is a possibility of connecting it to the ground via a small capacitor?
your suggestions.

cdt