¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: Linux based tools for Nano VNA ?
09:33 Sun 25 Aug 19 , Andy G0FTD via Groups.Io wrote: Do you mean the toolchain? Yes, just follow README.md, arm-none-eabi-* is what you need Under debian you can found dfu-util package, this one:
By Lapo Pieri <ik5nax@...> · #1323 ·
Re: The benefits of screening
Mike, Yup, your right, thanks for the corrections. And for the report. I just wanted to emphasize that it's not so simple to distinguish good from bad, which seems to be on the minds of many here. And
By Jerry Gaffke · #1322 ·
Re: Place to buy
Probably not. The last I heard Hugen was only selling via Alibaba sites: chinese language Taobao.com and international Alibaba.com. Not necessarily a bad clone of course. Mike
By Mike Brown · #1321 ·
Re: Place to buy
Is it one of the Hugen good ones?
By cecil moore <w5dxp@...> · #1320 ·
Re: Place to buy
Before I joined this group and before I knew anything about Hugen, I bought the attached from ST-EC. How does one tell a good black one from a bad black one?
By cecil moore <w5dxp@...> · #1319 ·
Re: Quick compare with HP 8753C...
Fun puzzles. Casual users just wanting to check an antenna or measure a filter with their nanoVNA need not worry about these inner workings. I mentioned the script from Jeff in posts 1307 and 1311,
By Jerry Gaffke · #1318 ·
Re: The benefits of screening
Hi Jerry If you re-read my first message (which was included below the text of my second email and is still present at the end if this one) you'll see I acknowledged that I may have been lucky in the
By Mike Brown · #1317 ·
Linux based tools for Nano VNA ?
Are there any Linux based tools available ? Is there anyway to upload the .DFU files to the device on Linux ? I use Linux Mint 18.3 here, or Raspbian Linux. Also, has any supplier only sent out a
By Andy G0FTD <punkbiscuit@...> · #1316 ·
Re: Your NanoVNA version - good clone, semi-bad clone comparison
I think I have all three. A good Black one with shielding that has 80 dB dynamic range on the low end and 60 dB on the high end. A White one without shielding that has 70 dB on the low end and 50 dB
By jimcking@... · #1315 ·
Re: Further Comments on Resistive Bridges
Hi Hans. I have a copy of the original page from the magazine. I can try to do a scan for a pdf. However, the main figure that is fundamental to the article is in my prior message post as a LT Spice
By alan victor · #1314 ·
Re: The benefits of screening
There's a bunch of different manufacturers making clones. Seems dangerous to make blanket statements about performance on the basis of screened (shielded) vs unscreened or black vs white. Perhaps
By Jerry Gaffke · #1313 ·
Re: Further Comments on Resistive Bridges
Hi Jerry, Regarding any questions you have regarding the Matlab function I posted for S11 correction, if you were to post them in that original thread, I would be happy to try to answer them. Best,
By Jeff Anderson · #1312 ·
Re: Further Comments on Resistive Bridges
Looking at this again in the morning after a cup of coffee, they're all just values for Gamma, the reflection coefficient. Pass this function the three Gamma's obtained from the calibration set plus
By Jerry Gaffke · #1311 ·
The benefits of screening
As noted in my previous post, my unscreened NanoVNA seems to perform marginally better than my screened sample in terms of noise & internal crosstalk. As I no longer have access to an anechoic chamber
By Mike Brown · #1310 ·
Re: Further Comments on Resistive Bridges
That article is not quite available, the figures are all missing. Do you have some archival address available for the Dunbar article? >
By Hans J Albertsson · #1309 ·
Re: Place to buy
Bought mine from https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Original-2-8-Touchscreen-50KHz-900MHz_62232701280.html as per Hugen's recommendation, a week ago. 60usd incl shipping. Shipped via DHL, and DHL
By Hans J Albertsson · #1308 ·
Re: Further Comments on Resistive Bridges
That RF and Microwave article on the Wheatstone Bridge that Alan cited is indeed excellent. It can be found on the mwrf website:
By Jerry Gaffke · #1307 ·
Re: Yet another NanoVNA case
No prob
By HexAndFlex · #1306 ·
Re: NanoVna Parts
I have used a similar switch and it should be better. https://lcsc.com/product-detail/Multi-Directional-Switches_Korean-Hroparts-Elec-K1-1502SA-02_C128929.html
Re: Yet another NanoVNA case
Printed it, fits well for my version. Thanks, HexAndFlex! 73 Mike AF7KR
By vbifyz · #1304 ·