¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: NanoVNA V2
Dave K wrote:- Reading glasses. I finally decided this year to bother having some, rather than rely on "DX glasses". Makes a world of difference. None of us are getting younger ;-) 73 de Andy
By London Calling <punkbiscuit@...> · #2988 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
With the greatest of respect, you are not on a professional forum, or any forum that requires your company details. The forums that you inhabit are typically hobbyist in nature. As such there is no
By London Calling <punkbiscuit@...> · #2987 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
Well, Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd is using this form as advertising for his business... clearly. Michael, WT9V
By Michael · #2986 ·
Re: NanoVNA Saver
No problem Tom, thanks again for the suggestion :-) -- Rune / 5Q5R
By Rune Broberg · #2985 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
Hello, Here are the references - for a few wrongly shaped pdfs you may use, please, a "secure" removal tool - e.g. the freeware : http://www.pdfshaper.com/download.html [1] Total Differential Errors
By gin&pez@arg · #2984 ·
Re: NanoVNA Saver
Hi Rune, Wow - Your amazing!!! Looks perfect! Many thanks! Tom VA7TA
By Tom VA7TA · #2983 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
qrp.ddc wrote ¡­ Hope they will not use integrated ADC, because it will reduce performance a lot.
By hwalker · #2982 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
From: Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd The name of my company, it's company number, where it is registered, and the registered address is required under UK law. I would have thought my
By David J Taylor · #2981 ·
Re: Evaluating clamp on ferrite chokes
For these frequencies, the key is the number of turns. You need a ring (not a snap-on cylinder), and thread the coax as many times as you can through it. If your application is QRP or RX only, use
By vbifyz · #2980 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
Hope they will not use integrated ADC, because it will reduce performance a lot.
By QRP RX · #2979 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
Additional tidbits of information. 1. The V2 PCB is 4 layers. 2. The schematics will be posted soon, at the same time as the launch on taobao, 3. Design objectives include keeping BOM cost below $100
By hwalker · #2978 ·
Re: What is the minimal screen resolution for nanovna-saver?
Hi Rune, I asked because some programs require minimal resolutions, otherwise dialog boxes etc. are cut off. Good to know that this is not the case with nanovna-saver. Regards, Arndt Am 24.09.19 um
By Der Solinger · #2977 ·
Re: NanoVNA Saver
It almost looks like you already have! ;-) I'll definitely consider it. -- Rune / 5Q5R
By Rune Broberg · #2976 ·
Re: What is the minimal screen resolution for nanovna-saver?
It doesn't *require* any particular resolution, but the interface only fits in the vertical direction if there's at least ~750 pixels. So there would be scroll bars. It's not the end of the world. :-)
By Rune Broberg · #2975 ·
Re: NanoVNA Saver
Hi RUne, Might you be able to add a port rescan button so we don't have to restart the application if we change USB ports? Thanks, Larry
By Larry Rothman · #2974 ·
What is the minimal screen resolution for nanovna-saver?
Hello, What is the minimal screen resolution for nanovna-saver? I have an old netbook with 1024 x 600 pixels which I could take with me to connect to the nanovna. Regards, Arndt
By Der Solinger · #2973 ·
Re: on the comparisons
Hi Erik Super, I will test it within a couple of days as I am on a job where T-Check will be made Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected]
By Kurt Poulsen · #2972 ·
Re: on the comparisons
+++++ --
By John Nightingale · #2971 ·
Re: Strange bug with 5 kHz span
Just tested previous firmware it works stable with 1 kHz span. Yes, it has wrong measurement with span below 100 Hz. But the new firmware is unstable below 10 kHz, this is much more worse...
By QRP RX · #2970 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
Hi to everyone, About the nanovna2. I really dont mind the screen size. I have the first one and find it ok. The only thing is that if used outside it is low in lights. But the size, not a problem, I
By Pierre Martel <petem001@...> · #2969 ·