Re: Deal on ebay
213 of 219 ratings were positive.? I looked, complaints seem to be mostly shipping time.? I've had no real problems with guys like this - over about 1000 transactions.? So I don't shy away from a
By
WY6K Mike Watts
·
#3474
·
|
Re: Deal on ebay
I look at those numbers entirely differently! I see ONLY 219 and I see his rating already dropped down to 97%! If I wanted to beat the competition I'd price it at say $35. I'll bet IF this comes as a
By
Roy Appleton
·
#3473
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2 - I vote for a larger instrument...
Nothing wrong with "N" Types, But how about TNC... According to Amphenol and RS good from DC - 11Ghz. And a better size for small VNAs. Paul
By
Paul Brodie
·
#3472
·
|
Re: Deal on ebay
97.3% of 219 transactions is a horrible record. I would never buy sonething from him (but I would look to see what the specific complaints are). DaveD Sent from a small flat thingy
By
Dave Daniel
·
#3471
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2 - I vote for a larger instrument...
Perhaps the solution is a tablet that run nanoVNAsaver. Larger screen, reasonable touch sensitivity so we don't have to sharpen finger. (Ran a finger into table saw 10 years ago: don't recommend it)
By
M Walter
·
#3470
·
|
Re: Deal on ebay
He has 219 transactions, has already sold 39 of these, and 97.3% positive feedback.? Those are not bad numbers.? ?But, like you say, we will see... Mike WY6K "... somewhere in the distance, there's
By
WY6K Mike Watts
·
#3469
·
|
Re: Another modified nanoVNA software
Hi Gyula, After entering the cable VF, say '66' for 0.66, wait for the selection file dialog to appear, and then select your s1p file. ====== To other members who ask to try the software, please check
By
neb
·
#3468
·
|
Re: Deal on ebay
I certainly don't need another one, but I couldn't resist!? Wonder if it's a scam or a mistake?? Maybe he meant to make it an auction? Mike WY6K "... somewhere in the distance, there's a tower and a
By
WY6K Mike Watts
·
#3467
·
|
Re: Deal on ebay
Good luck with that! This may be a case of you get what you pay for! Plus the guy has low numbers! Roy WA0YMH [email protected]> wrote:
By
Roy Appleton
·
#3466
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2 - I vote for a larger instrument...
By the way, for my needs, I would like an instrument that goes from 100 kHz to at lease 1 GHz. Burt, K6OQK
By
Burt K6OQK
·
#3465
·
|
Re: NanoVNA usable as spectrum analyzer?. Yes, if you know what you are doing
This is an interesting topic.? How would I hook it up to use it as a spectrum analyzer?? Run the signal into the CH0 and kook at logmag? Mike WY6K "... somewhere in the distance, there's a tower and
By
WY6K Mike Watts
·
#3464
·
|
Deal on ebay
I just found this and ordered. Thought others might be interested.... NanoVNA Vector Network Analyzer HF VHF UHF Antenna 2.8" TFT Screen 50KHz-900MHz | eBay | | | | $20.99 | | | | | | | NanoVNA Vector
By
James R. Chastain <suenrod@...>
·
#3463
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2
Here is an overview of the xaVNA: https://www.geeky-gadgets.com/two-port-vector-network-analyzer-20-10-2017/
By
Larry Rothman
·
#3462
·
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
I was unaware that it could not do that, but it doesn¡¯t change the fact you can use T-checker or airlines on another VNA, or perhaps the external software for the NanoVNA. I am sure I will learn
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#3461
·
|
ST-Link V2 (Re: [nanovna-users] NanoVNA bricked)
In case you are now weighing the momentous decision whether you invest in one or not, I recommend to get a couple of these: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32684040486.html At $1.92 per piece shipped,
By
Carsten Bormann
·
#3460
·
|
Re: Another modified nanoVNA software
Hi neb, I tried to use the program and the .s2p made by others cannot display (works with nanovna saver) and using the TDR function I don't know how it works. I don't know what to load after typing%.
By
Gyula Molnar
·
#3459
·
|
Re: NanoVNA usable as spectrum analyzer?. Yes, if you know what you are doing
Hello again Eric and other possible readers. I received my nanoVNA a couple of weeks ago and I have been doing many tests with it. First I must say my unit came without shields and I added them, but
By
FRANCISCO JAVIER MURIEDAS ARGUMOSA
·
#3458
·
Edited
|
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
I had a problem with the link - initially I thought there was no file present, but later I see my iPhone had only put the first part in a link. You don¡¯t surprise me with your comment about the
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#3457
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2 - I vote for a larger instrument...
Hello If the list owner could open a poll, already a tool in groups.io, I will be happy to vote for my v.2 preferences. Bo
By
Bo, OZ2M
·
#3456
·
|
Re: NanoVNA bricked
Robert, The thanks actually go to the great user groups that have formed around the nanoVNA. I never understood why people are so enthusiastic about some open source projects until now. This group is
By
hwalker
·
#3455
·
|