¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: NooElec 1:9 balun #test-jig

 

Know what you are buying for a test fixture. Specs for trusted Coilcraft signal baluns (1/4 watt max.) Note how insertion loss will increase with bandwidth.
N0YWB


Re: Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

 

Mel, sometimes Kurt¡¯s links don¡¯t complete properly, even though all the words are there. Let¡¯s see if this works:

to the Test Chamber and Measurements above 500MHz.pdf

If not, try this :



Jeff


Re: Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

 

Hi Mel
Please copy from .. Until pdf and paste into your URL in a browser. Watch out for the inserted >
Then it works
Kind regards
Kurt

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af Mel Farrer, K6KBE
Sendt: 20. oktober 2019 18:05
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [nanovna-users] Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

Sorry the link does not open???

Mel, K6KBE

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 8:54 AM Kurt Poulsen <kurt@...> wrote:

Hi Ulrich
First of all I give you the link to another document not published but
in small "circles" and it will interest you I am sure
to the Test Chamber and Measurements
above 500MHz.pdf It might be entered in the browser directly as the io
groups messages does no like my notation ?
Regarding the adaptor, to which the male centerpin is engaging, is a
straight forward threaded SMA female female adaptor with a hex nut on
either side of the top plate, with a toothed washer on the top side.
For the male centerpin to find the female center bushing I just press
inserted a small 2mm long section of the Teflon part for a male SMA
adaptor. It has a hole of 1 mm and that is enough guidance for the
male pin to home in on the female bushing. I insert an image of both
sides, and in my case it was a bulkhead adaptor used but it does not matter what you use.
No wear to consider.
Just for the fun of it I show you my mico-chamber Regarding the DC
biasing I have no experience, but I do not see a big problem in that
either. The center pin resistance is very low so not much DC blocking
required to protect the VNWA TX out. The biggest problem is to know
the impedance of the RF isolation between the DC supply and the center
pin to be high enough. I imagine a SMA T adaptor and some sort of
resistive or inductive impedance to block the low impedance of the DC
supply. The impedance of the T adaptor seen from the RF isolation is
removed by the calibration on the output side of the T-adaptor
connected to the test chamber (with no DC current applied). So the
impedance for determining the inductance of the internal ground rod
without the toroid and with toroid is straight forward measurement as
such. How many Amps the SMA adaptors can carry is a matter for studying.
In my last mail I said some nonsense about the spreadsheet, which is
used for determining the rod impedance and that only. How to subtract
the inductance for the measurement with toroid is a matter of some
mathematics I think is covered by already available material else
revert to the matter Kind regards Kurt

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af
UlrichKraft
Sendt: 20. oktober 2019 15:25
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [nanovna-users] Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

Hello Kurt,
that is a wonderful description of what you three did a while go when
measuring the performance of ferrite materials. Very cool stuff and
because I'm just looking in exactly that topic I have a few questions
questions to your fixture. I'm still on a "beginner level" using VNA
for measuring ferrite impedances, so sorry for any stupid questiosn.

When you have inserted the ferrite bead and turning the adjustment
knob it will contact the SMA F connector at some point. What type of
SMA connector did you use? I would imagin that the inner conductor
gets damaged pretty fast after using the fixture a few times? Or is that a "special"
type of SMA with more robust inner-conductor design ?

Do you know if something similar is commercially available?

Secondly, I like to characterize the ferrits with DC-BIAS current from
0 up to 10 Amps.. That changes ferrite impedance and frequency,
depending on saturation of the material.
See

cable-emi-suppression-cores/ For relatively large ferrite cores it
might be easy just adding an additional wire through the inner
dimeter, with a DC-current. That way the
RF- and DC wires are separated.
But for smaller components like wound-beads (e.g. Fair-Rite
2961666671) I need to "inject" the DC current into the signal line of
the VNA. Do you have any experience how to do that best? What kind of
RF-filtering / DC-blocking needs to be build ? How is calibration
performed then? The additional filtering will definitely change the
overall S11 response, but I want to see only the ferrite effect on the
Impedance and not any effect of that filter. The intended frequency
range is up to 500 MHz for #61 material, but ideally for full span of nanovna up to 1 GHz.












Re: The Male Calibration Kit for AliExpress

 

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 12:02 PM, Kurt Poulsen wrote:
Do not expect the NanoVNA to beat a more advanced VNA
Hello Kurt,
Thank you for the detailed analysis.

I do not want to tune the nanoVNA to a competitor of a HP VNA.

I just want to make the best out of it with little effort,
finding the weak spots and improve them, like:

73, Rudi DL5FA


Re: Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

 

Hi Urrich
I think it is worth mentioning that only when a toroid/clamp is measured in a closed chamber the true charcteristics of the material is measured. Using an open air loop you are "fooling yourself" as field lined are escaping. This statement might get someone to protest, as they have so and so good experience but fact is fact.
We got Fair Rite to admit it was not the true characteristics for the material they published, but that was the best they could do (at that time) using a short wire thru a test core.
Kind regards
Kurt

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af UlrichKraft
Sendt: 20. oktober 2019 15:25
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [nanovna-users] Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

Hello Kurt,
that is a wonderful description of what you three did a while go when measuring the performance of ferrite materials. Very cool stuff and because I'm just looking in exactly that topic I have a few questions questions to your fixture. I'm still on a "beginner level" using VNA for measuring ferrite impedances, so sorry for any stupid questiosn.

When you have inserted the ferrite bead and turning the adjustment knob it will contact the SMA F connector at some point. What type of SMA connector did you use? I would imagin that the inner conductor gets damaged pretty fast after using the fixture a few times? Or is that a "special" type of SMA with more robust inner-conductor design ?

Do you know if something similar is commercially available?

Secondly, I like to characterize the ferrits with DC-BIAS current from 0 up to 10 Amps.. That changes ferrite impedance and frequency, depending on saturation of the material.
See
For relatively large ferrite cores it might be easy just adding an additional wire through the inner dimeter, with a DC-current. That way the RF- and DC wires are separated.
But for smaller components like wound-beads (e.g. Fair-Rite 2961666671) I need to "inject" the DC current into the signal line of the VNA. Do you have any experience how to do that best? What kind of RF-filtering / DC-blocking needs to be build ? How is calibration performed then? The additional filtering will definitely change the overall S11 response, but I want to see only the ferrite effect on the Impedance and not any effect of that filter. The intended frequency range is up to 500 MHz for #61 material, but ideally for full span of nanovna up to 1 GHz.


Re: Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

Mel Farrer, K6KBE
 

Sorry the link does not open???

Mel, K6KBE

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 8:54 AM Kurt Poulsen <kurt@...> wrote:

Hi Ulrich
First of all I give you the link to another document not published but in
small "circles" and it will interest you I am sure
to the Test Chamber and Measurements
above 500MHz.pdf
It might be entered in the browser directly as the io groups messages does
no like my notation ?
Regarding the adaptor, to which the male centerpin is engaging, is a
straight forward threaded SMA female female adaptor with a hex nut on
either side of the top plate, with a toothed washer on the top side.
For the male centerpin to find the female center bushing I just press
inserted a small 2mm long section of the Teflon part for a male SMA
adaptor. It has a hole of 1 mm and that is enough guidance for the male pin
to home in on the female bushing. I insert an image of both sides, and in
my case it was a bulkhead adaptor used but it does not matter what you use.
No wear to consider.
Just for the fun of it I show you my mico-chamber
Regarding the DC biasing I have no experience, but I do not see a big
problem in that either. The center pin resistance is very low so not much
DC blocking required to protect the VNWA TX out. The biggest problem is to
know the impedance of the RF isolation between the DC supply and the center
pin to be high enough. I imagine a SMA T adaptor and some sort of resistive
or inductive impedance to block the low impedance of the DC supply. The
impedance of the T adaptor seen from the RF isolation is removed by the
calibration on the output side of the T-adaptor connected to the test
chamber (with no DC current applied). So the impedance for determining the
inductance of the internal ground rod without the toroid and with toroid is
straight forward measurement as such. How many Amps the SMA adaptors can
carry is a matter for studying.
In my last mail I said some nonsense about the spreadsheet, which is used
for determining the rod impedance and that only. How to subtract the
inductance for the measurement with toroid is a matter of some mathematics
I think is covered by already available material else revert to the matter
Kind regards
Kurt

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af
UlrichKraft
Sendt: 20. oktober 2019 15:25
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [nanovna-users] Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

Hello Kurt,
that is a wonderful description of what you three did a while go when
measuring the performance of ferrite materials. Very cool stuff and because
I'm just looking in exactly that topic I have a few questions questions to
your fixture. I'm still on a "beginner level" using VNA for measuring
ferrite impedances, so sorry for any stupid questiosn.

When you have inserted the ferrite bead and turning the adjustment knob
it will contact the SMA F connector at some point. What type of SMA
connector did you use? I would imagin that the inner conductor gets damaged
pretty fast after using the fixture a few times? Or is that a "special"
type of SMA with more robust inner-conductor design ?

Do you know if something similar is commercially available?

Secondly, I like to characterize the ferrits with DC-BIAS current from 0
up to 10 Amps.. That changes ferrite impedance and frequency, depending on
saturation of the material.
See

For relatively large ferrite cores it might be easy just adding an
additional wire through the inner dimeter, with a DC-current. That way the
RF- and DC wires are separated.
But for smaller components like wound-beads (e.g. Fair-Rite 2961666671) I
need to "inject" the DC current into the signal line of the VNA. Do you
have any experience how to do that best? What kind of RF-filtering /
DC-blocking needs to be build ? How is calibration performed then? The
additional filtering will definitely change the overall S11 response, but I
want to see only the ferrite effect on the Impedance and not any effect of
that filter. The intended frequency range is up to 500 MHz for #61
material, but ideally for full span of nanovna up to 1 GHz.












Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.3

 

On 16/10/2019 13:38, Rune Broberg wrote:
I just released NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.3!
Hi Rune,
Many thanks for this new version.

I can't comment on the improvements as this is the first version that I have tested, but so far it's working well.

I have pushed a new package for nanovna-saver to the Mageia Cauldron repository (our development branch).


It adds the current user to the dialout group on install, has a .desktop file and a temporary icon.

This will be available in our next release of Mageia (8).

I can provide a .rpm for use with the current stable release of Mageia 7 if anyone would like to contact me directly.

Attached is a short video of it running in Mageia 7 connected to a HWEF 80/40m antenna.

Do you have an 'official' icon design available?

Cheers,
Barry
G4MKT


Re: gnuplot for nanoVNA Touchstone files

 

Thanks for the info. I'm new to gnuplot and WSL (and NanoVNA for that matter), so didn't know about the X Windows capability in WSL. Will have to try it.
Roman


Re: Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

 

Hi Ulrich
First of all I give you the link to another document not published but in small "circles" and it will interest you I am sure
to the Test Chamber and Measurements above 500MHz.pdf
It might be entered in the browser directly as the io groups messages does no like my notation ?
Regarding the adaptor, to which the male centerpin is engaging, is a straight forward threaded SMA female female adaptor with a hex nut on either side of the top plate, with a toothed washer on the top side.
For the male centerpin to find the female center bushing I just press inserted a small 2mm long section of the Teflon part for a male SMA adaptor. It has a hole of 1 mm and that is enough guidance for the male pin to home in on the female bushing. I insert an image of both sides, and in my case it was a bulkhead adaptor used but it does not matter what you use. No wear to consider.
Just for the fun of it I show you my mico-chamber
Regarding the DC biasing I have no experience, but I do not see a big problem in that either. The center pin resistance is very low so not much DC blocking required to protect the VNWA TX out. The biggest problem is to know the impedance of the RF isolation between the DC supply and the center pin to be high enough. I imagine a SMA T adaptor and some sort of resistive or inductive impedance to block the low impedance of the DC supply. The impedance of the T adaptor seen from the RF isolation is removed by the calibration on the output side of the T-adaptor connected to the test chamber (with no DC current applied). So the impedance for determining the inductance of the internal ground rod without the toroid and with toroid is straight forward measurement as such. How many Amps the SMA adaptors can carry is a matter for studying.
In my last mail I said some nonsense about the spreadsheet, which is used for determining the rod impedance and that only. How to subtract the inductance for the measurement with toroid is a matter of some mathematics I think is covered by already available material else revert to the matter
Kind regards
Kurt

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af UlrichKraft
Sendt: 20. oktober 2019 15:25
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [nanovna-users] Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

Hello Kurt,
that is a wonderful description of what you three did a while go when measuring the performance of ferrite materials. Very cool stuff and because I'm just looking in exactly that topic I have a few questions questions to your fixture. I'm still on a "beginner level" using VNA for measuring ferrite impedances, so sorry for any stupid questiosn.

When you have inserted the ferrite bead and turning the adjustment knob it will contact the SMA F connector at some point. What type of SMA connector did you use? I would imagin that the inner conductor gets damaged pretty fast after using the fixture a few times? Or is that a "special" type of SMA with more robust inner-conductor design ?

Do you know if something similar is commercially available?

Secondly, I like to characterize the ferrits with DC-BIAS current from 0 up to 10 Amps.. That changes ferrite impedance and frequency, depending on saturation of the material.
See
For relatively large ferrite cores it might be easy just adding an additional wire through the inner dimeter, with a DC-current. That way the RF- and DC wires are separated.
But for smaller components like wound-beads (e.g. Fair-Rite 2961666671) I need to "inject" the DC current into the signal line of the VNA. Do you have any experience how to do that best? What kind of RF-filtering / DC-blocking needs to be build ? How is calibration performed then? The additional filtering will definitely change the overall S11 response, but I want to see only the ferrite effect on the Impedance and not any effect of that filter. The intended frequency range is up to 500 MHz for #61 material, but ideally for full span of nanovna up to 1 GHz.


Is it possible to do a display driver swap?

 

Hello,

Let's say I want to use another display with an incompatible controller, does just the ili9341.c file need to be changed? Will it be just a drop-in replacement?


Re: errors of "error" models

 

#63 : @Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd
/g/nanovna-users/message/5324
20 October 2019

Hello,

Thank you very much for your kind invitation.

In fact, you violate open doors, because it was in our
intentions from the beginning to build a short PDF on
this part of our most successful research here.

But, due to our duty of responding first to all these
questions regarding our work, this have to be delayed
a little - if you don't mind of course.

Anyway, allow us, please, to have our strong reservations
if the contents of this PDF shall finally cover the taste of all
honorable members of this group.

After all that said, allow us, please, to present our work
in the way and sequence we have to know better than
any other else and -most of all- without any further
defamation of it.

In the Name of Scientific Knowledge at last.

Sincerely,

gin&pez@arg

63#


Re: Upgrade MCU from STM32F072C8T6 to STM32F303CCT6

 

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 04:35 PM, Ken Liao, AA6KL wrote:


Athough I was able to double the sweep points, I could not save the
calibration result. Each time I save the calibrated data, it hangs. I think I
need to look into the flash.c code.
NanoVNA firmware uses poorly hardcoded memory address in the flash for store configuration. There is no check and it may overlap with the code. You're needs to check that.


Re: errors of "error" models

 

#62 : On the Most Reasonable Questions with the Most Clear Answers

Hello,

Allow us, please, to think that it is now the right time to set
the following, most reasonable, questions and give their
respective, most clear, answers:

- - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : start - - - - - -

Q1 : Who is "The Common User" and what does it mean "to operate
an instrument "facupov" : From A Common User's Point of View" ?

A1 : First of all, we welcome in our sow [Small Objective World]
"The Common User", that is anyone who wants -as we do- to be
able to operate an instrument in at least one useful way for
his purposes, without diving too deep into its technicalities,
by keeping himself outside of it as much as possible, or to put
it on other words : anyone who wants to be able "to operate an
instrument facupov : From A Common's User Point Of View".

Q2 : Is it possible to operate any VNA "[AnyVNA]" facupov ?

A2 : After the completion of our related research here, it seems
to us now, more than ever before, that this is possible, as long as
he is willing enough, of course, to adopt our just 36 (previously 39)
character long description "[LeastVNA]" of [Any VNA], holding
perfectly clear in our sow.

Q3 : What is the "[LeastVNA]" description of [AnyVNA] ?

A3 : That one of an operating [AnyVNA] with a connected one-port
load. In this case, the generator of [AnyVNA] produces a primary
signal which almost always forces the load to produce a secondary
one, except when it has or matching the characteristic
value of [AnyVNA], and thus it results to a zero secondary. By
construction, [AnyVNA] forms and measures the ratio of the
secondary to the primary FAR AWAY from the connected load and
delivers it to the user. Because of this distanced measurement,
when the user has to measure an unknown load, he has to connect
and read not only the unknown one ratio given as g, but also,
in addition to that, to connect three 3 known loads : Short, Matching,
and Open ones, and measure them as s, l, and o, and then to
calculate|compute the unknown value G by using our 36 character
long formula:

G=(g-l)(o-s)/[(g-o)(s-l)-(g-s)(l-o)]

That's all.

- No S parameters
- No "Errors"
- No TDR
- No FDR
- No Waves
- No Pulses
- No Reflections
- No Incidents
- No whatever else
- No nothing

- Just that:

G=(g-l)(o-s)/[(g-o)(s-l)-(g-s)(l-o)]

And this is just one of the results of our research in this group.

Q4 : Is there a [LeastVNA] of [NanoVNA] ?

A4 : Yes, of course, there is our /F/L/O/S/S/ computer program, which
is based on the Putty output -in the way most successfully described
elsewhere in this group of honorable members- of which the current
version was already mentioned at:

#59 : UPDATE : [LeastVNA] : version 20191020
/g/nanovna-users/message/5269
20 October 2019

in the wide context of :

#50 : The Full Final Report 1 :
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Nominal Values Zinp = ( Rinp , Xinp )
of our Standard [ref2007box], in terms of
frequency, using [NanoVNA] and [VNA]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[NanoVNA] ~ [VNA] Comparison
16 October 2019
/g/nanovna-users/message/5061

and detailed step-by-step in various of our replies
to specific questions in this very topic:

[errors in "error" models]

- Next to come : Explaining Our Full Final Report 2 -

- - - end : (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 - - - - - - - - - -

Sincerely,

gin&pez@arg

62#


Re: Saving multiple Cal data

 

Yes, I agree... I assumed you are in a Register other than ZERO.

But assumptions are bad! Good catch.

Note, Register zero always comes up at first turn on.

So I guess if you have a favorite sweep range and setup, for example, 1 to 30 MHz just for HF antenna work and just a one port cal. Then set that up in say Register 2, save it there and if need be save it in Register zero. Initially I had left Register zero alone, like it was sacred since it came from the factory. That is now long gone!

BR, Alan


Re: Wireless USB?

 

I remembered and found a USB Bluetooth adapter in my gadget bag. I connected it to the NanoVNA with a USB-OTG cable and usb-micro to usb-C adapter. Scanning for bluetooth devices with my Android v8 phone did not find any devices. I didn't expect the NanoVNA software to have a "host mode" connection and that may be why it didn't work. I was (am) hoping someone might know of a wireless replacement for the USB cable that goes from PC to NanoVNA. But it looks like the chances are very slim. In my case, it's not worth a lot of effort or expense just to save some inconvenience, although if something becomes available it might be very popular.
There may be a way to add such a communication capability to the NanoVNA, but it's probably a major effort and not worthwhile. Unless there turns out to be a lot of other requests for it!

Doug


Re: Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

Mel Farrer, K6KBE
 

I do one more thing when I finish the sorting, I stand them up close
together and spray paint the end gently with a color matching the first
number of the mix. 31 is orange, 43 is yellow etc. The marking on the
sides get worn off some times but the paint holds up really well and easy
to physically sort later.

Mel, K6KBE

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:29 AM KT7AZ <kt7az.v69@...> wrote:

I have had good luck with this home brew fixture using copper clad, N
panel mount connectors, BNC adapters and a flexible conductor wire that can
be detached on on side using some old cannon connector pins. I did modify
my idea several months ago from reading the three articles mentioned in
other posts. It definitely works to distinguish ferrite types.

My findings are that type 31 mix will work as great common mode chokes
down to 160 meters and up. Type 43 will attenuate common mode from mid HF
up.

Spent a few hours going through the door with about 50 mystery
²ú±ð²¹»å²õ/²õ²Ô²¹±è-´Ç²Ô¡¯²õ.

My method of marking the beads with a grey marker is finding the 3 dB and
6db points on any given bead and writing the frequency next to them.

Run the cal routine with fixture installed. I use the bottom two bnc¡¯s
that are pass throughs for the 50 and short load cal.

Gary
KT7AZ




Re: Saving multiple Cal data

 

one should first 'RESTORE 2', then 'RESET'?
Oops, first 'RECALL 2' then 'RESET'?


Re: Abbreviated documentation for more simplistic tasks?

 

Anyway, I personally don¡¯t think that it is a good idea to introduce the
Smith Chart to beginners, but others obviously at least one other person
disagrees.
This is a nanoVNA affinity group, and Smith is a default display,
so edy555 presumably considered it appropriate.

nanoVNA shell `data 0` (S11) values can be plotted directly to Smith charts.

Those are among this tool's basic attributes. Other formats,
perhaps more comfortably familiar to some,
are complications to and abstractions from them.


Re: Measuring ferrite beads #test-jig

 

I have had good luck with this home brew fixture using copper clad, N panel mount connectors, BNC adapters and a flexible conductor wire that can be detached on on side using some old cannon connector pins. I did modify my idea several months ago from reading the three articles mentioned in other posts. It definitely works to distinguish ferrite types.

My findings are that type 31 mix will work as great common mode chokes down to 160 meters and up. Type 43 will attenuate common mode from mid HF up.

Spent a few hours going through the door with about 50 mystery ²ú±ð²¹»å²õ/²õ²Ô²¹±è-´Ç²Ô¡¯²õ.

My method of marking the beads with a grey marker is finding the 3 dB and 6db points on any given bead and writing the frequency next to them.

Run the cal routine with fixture installed. I use the bottom two bnc¡¯s that are pass throughs for the 50 and short load cal.

Gary
KT7AZ


Re: Abbreviated documentation for more simplistic tasks?

Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd
 

On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 09:46, Oristo <ormpoa@...> wrote:

Don¡¯t you feel that the Smith Chart is *far* away from the original
posters
question about things for *beginners*? The original poster suggested
finding the resonate frequency of an antenna.
Smith charts show resonances, where plots crosses horizontal axis.

Yes, if measured directly at the antenna, or calibrated there. Beginners
might not know that.

But I find it hard to believe it is the simplest way to show it.

a quick skim read indicated no reference to what the x & y axes are,
which is something I have noticed with several descriptions of the
Smith Chart.

Sad, because Smith chart simply plots S11 reactance vs resistance.

Yes, the Smith Chart is a complicated way of that, with non-linear axes.

The Smith Chart is a plot of the imaginary part of the reflection
coefficient vs the real part of the reflection coefficient, in a nice
linear format.

That gives you a graph which is -1,0 on the left, 0,0 in the middle and
+1,0 on the right. The top is 0,1, the bottom is 0,-1.

Anyway, I personally don¡¯t think that it is a good idea to introduce the
Smith Chart to beginners, but others obviously at least one other person
disagrees.

Dave
--
Dr. David Kirkby,
Kirkby Microwave Ltd,
drkirkby@...

Telephone 01621-680100./ +44 1621 680100

Registered in England & Wales, company number 08914892.
Registered office:
Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Althorne, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT, United
Kingdom