¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
With thershold more than 300 MHz si5351 will use wrong frequency. Hardware works ok, so there is no PLL icon, but it uses wrong frequencies, so it won't works properly. Some invalid thereshold values
By QRP RX · #6320 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
But I think, most of all, this issue is related to some garbage in the settings (bad configuration settings). Another way to fix bad configuration settings is to cleanup all memory before firmware
By QRP RX · #6319 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
FWIW, by setting 'threshold 330000000', my nanoVNA gets crazy CH0 and CH1 logmag and Smith @ 983140600 Hz but no PLL icon, perhaps because power-on default scan does not go over 100MHz.
By Oristo · #6318 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
yes
By QRP RX · #6317 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Does that mean that if threshold frequency is set to 250 MHz then instead of 3 x 300 MHz = 900 MHz the
By hwalker · #6316 ·
Re: Console command and FW 0.2.3 edy555
Yes, this is not possible to get more that 101 points with data command. Because firmware has fixed 101 points and you cannot change that. You can use NanoVNA-Q firmware, it has scanraw command which
By QRP RX · #6315 ·
Re: 50ohm cal load failed
SMA connectors are fragile, and provided load spins in nanoVNA female socket. Some folks reduce CH0 SMA connector wear by adding male-female adapter. For frequent recalibration and BNC-equipped DUTs,
By Oristo · #6314 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
Also, you can try to setup START and STOP frequency in the STIMULUS menu, if PLL icon disappears after that, it means that your configuration has invalid frequencies and it's recommended to cleanup
By QRP RX · #6313 ·
Re: 50ohm cal load failed
thanks for the info, I did not think I would be the only one Thanks Dave 2E0DMB
By davebb123456 · #6312 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
This PLL icon means that si5351 failed to setup some frequencies during sweep. There are two possible reasons: 1) bad configuration settings (it may store invalid frequencies for the sweep) 2) bad
By QRP RX · #6311 ·
Re: 50ohm cal load failed
the load I got happens to have bad contact internally too, reacts when shaking or knocking at the table. Recommend use of better SMA-Loads for calibration. See RF-Parts or other dealer
By Arno DK3SS · #6310 ·
50ohm cal load failed
Hi My 50 ohm cal load failed that I got in the kit, has anyone had this happen to them ? Thanks Dave 2E0DMB
By davebb123456 · #6309 ·
Re: Console command and FW 0.2.3 edy555
Hi , now I upgraded to 3.0.1 , but the problem is still present. I think is not possibile to have more than 101 points. And sweep cmd , not allow to set step size , but agin number of points. Now I
By Maurizio IZ1MDJ · #6308 ·
Re: Which firmware ? (Survey)
QRP has 'scanraw' command, which is more powerful than edy555 'scan' https://github.com/qrp73/NanoVNA-Q/releases
By Oristo · #6307 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- QRP's 0.4.2 firmware includes a hardware check for the si5351. It tests if your NanoVNA will operate reliably
By hwalker · #6306 ·
Re: Deal on ebay
Just got my money back from the last bogus eBay listing at $19.95! Roy WA0YMH
By Roy Appleton · #6305 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
Hi KE8CPD - That is also the first time I have seen it, but it explains your crazy plot. QRP added a check for those clock chips which cannot do 300MHz. The workaround is set 'threshold' from USB
By Oristo · #6304 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
#70: facupov : a 64-bit working maxima under windows in 2 cases Hello, Allow us, please, to inform you that after hard days-and-nights of many-many trials-and-errors, including tedious searching for
By gin&pez@arg · #6303 ·
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
I flashed the attached firmware and took a screen capture. Please see attached. Not sure what the PLL means in this firmware but that is the first time seeing it.
By KE8CPD · #6302 ·
Re: Deal on ebay
Just ordered one for fun at $15.99... ref 254398992632
By hb9 iiu · #6301 ·