Re: THE NANOVNA - A COMMENT
Dave, thank you for a well written and POSITIVE comment. I follow the Reviews section on eHam daily, and there are REALLY folks out there, that would complain about being hung with a new rope! It's
By
Ron Bussiere <n4ue@...>
·
#8078
·
|
THE NANOVNA - A COMMENT
All too often we receive criticism for something we have accomplished or completed. Well, that is not the intention of this email. My life-long philosophy in such things is that a milligram (choose
By
W0LEV
·
#8077
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
#81" : update : on the physical expression of two-port s-parameters REF: 9 December 2019 - /g/nanovna-users/message/8065 - #81' : update : on the physical expression of two-port
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#8076
·
|
Re: nanoVNAPartner v0.17
hi, please release source code. i use linux I forgot virus and antivirus....
By
Gufo Rosso
·
#8075
·
|
Re: Brand new user here
Stylus: Cheap plastic 0.5mm "Bic" mechanical pencil, with the lead withdrawn. It even has a nice rubber grip! As a bonus, you can pump the lead out 1 click and take notes! :) 73, --kv5r
By
KV5R <kv5r@...>
·
#8074
·
|
Re: New version of NanoVNA-Saver: 0.2.1
Hi Rudi, Copy everythimg from screenshot. I not lucky, i tried write longer reply from my phone. I lost it 3 times. I will help you if required from my pc. 73, Lajos
By
pgc1682@...
·
#8073
·
|
Re: nanoVNAPartner v0.17
HI Ed, Have you tried downloading it from this link: https://gofile.io/?c=NvYLRD Kind regards, neb
By
neb
·
#8072
·
|
Re: nanoVNA Partner
#nanovna_partner
Hi betex, Thanks for having interest with the software, I posted the latest version here:
By
neb
·
#8071
·
|
Re: nanoVNA Partner
#nanovna_partner
Hi neb, your software looks quite nice, but unfortunately the link has expired... Could you please upload it again? Many thanks! betex
By
betex
·
#8070
·
|
Re: USB connection affecting measuring vertical ground-plane antenna
#usb
#calibration
#measurement
Many thanks for all your answers! Taking now a 2m cable with ferrites at both ends is working really great! No more signal-affecting when connecting to USB!! :-)) ...and of course it might not be a
By
betex
·
#8069
·
|
Re: connector swap
And check the connectors, not the markings on the cable. I have seen 75 ohm coax jumpers with 50 ohm BNC connectors on the ends. Such cables are not recommended if you are using a resonant antenna,
By
Shirley Dulcey KE1L
·
#8068
·
|
Re: 30MHz and below
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 09:33 AM, QRP RX wrote: "Just use menu STIMULUS and set STOP = 30 MHZ. After that perform calibration and save to memory cell 0. Thats it. Now it will works to max 30 MHz with
By
hwalker
·
#8067
·
|
Re: 30MHz and below
Just use menu STIMULUS and set STOP = 30 MHZ. After that perform calibration and save to memory cell 0. Thats it. Now it will works to max 30 MHz with no harmonics mode.
By
QRP RX
·
#8066
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
@ Gary O'Neil, N3GO - 9 December 2019 /g/nanovna-users/message/8059 Dear Gary, No, there is not only the numeral two. There are a lot of ones and small Ls. But, could you wait a
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#8065
·
|
Re: New version of NanoVNA-Saver: 0.2.1
Hello pgc1682, Thank you very much for your help with SimSmith. Unfortunately I cannot follow your explanation. I have loaded my data file nanoVNA_RG173-30cm_202_500MHz_Open.s1p in SimSmith, see
By
Rudi
·
#8064
·
|
Re: The T-Check confusion
I would not say the matching is poor on port 2. I measured it using my HP VNA. At least on the NanoVNA sample I have, the return loss on port 2 is better than the specification on my HP 8720D VNA. I
By
Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd
·
#8063
·
|
Re: 30MHz and below
Why not just calibrate for the frequencies you care about and save as your default? It doesn't seem like a custom firmware is needed to only see a segment you want. Since it is less than 300mhz, you
By
M Garza <mgarza896@...>
·
#8062
·
|
Re: The T-Check confusion
Hi Erik Fantastic ... I did not know you was maintaining TAPR VNA (or I had forgotten it) Looking forward to follow your project. My transfer switch is also Sivers Lab but only PM7551 ? with a
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#8061
·
|
Re: 30MHz and below
Two questions to answer: 1: Is there anything you can improve for HF by removing/adding it from the current firmware of the nanoVNA? The only thing I can think of is to force the SI5351 to always use
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#8060
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
GIN&PEZ; You are in excellent company. The Romans thought they could avert the zero issue altogether by not using it at all. They must have realized that the number 1 was going to be a problem when
By
Gary O'Neil
·
#8059
·
|