开云体育

Hello Klaus, Your Smith chart 8.png of test field 8 (470 nH) shows at low frequency an Open. That can not be correct. To verify your calibration please test: My Smith chart in diagram

You can help people helping you by posting some picture. Steps to take: 1: Go to calibration and do a reset and just to be sure switch the calibration off. (did you switch it on after doing your

We already have reports of a Linux distro with dependencies on a specific Python version that is incompatible with NanoVNA-saver. While running multiple Python versions is possible, screwing things up

LOn Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 07:16, <hugen@...> wrote: This version was ported by Ken Liao (AA6KL). You can check the following Can you send a *PayPal invoice* to someone so he can pay via PayPay?

That very much smells like bad calibration, which I get far too often. Watch Smith display during calibration. It will generally be incorrect, but should change between open, short and load.

I've measured with the VA5. The measurements are the same.

NanoVNA-saver is written in Python.? Gallium is based on/compatible with Xubuntu, and Python is available in the Ubuntu repositories.? So, I would assume that NanoVNA-saver would run just fine under

This version was ported by Ken Liao (AA6KL). You can check the following links to learn about the development process. /g/nanovna-users/topic/33107519

Loads are good. When I calibrate my nanovna-f with it everything’s works perfect. Just to be sure I have measured them and they are correct.

Hi Rune, Thank you very much for the wonderful nanovna-saver software. Python isn't my forte but I managed to install it on my Debian laptops without much of a hassle (Python3.7 was already installed

Does NanoVNA-saver run O.K. under Gallium? - Herb[

You won't need any patience, it's amazingly simple.? Like drop in an LC element between two impedances, and it automatically calculates appropriate values to match.? Tell it you want a high pass

Have not found anything on the net that indicates Android apps will run under Gallium. Anbox, which "puts the Android operating system in a container" runs under various Linux distros, but the

Thanks Hans for taking the time to explain your methods. I have been doing a lot of testing with my Nano since I rec'd it at the end of August. The s1p formatted data has been most useful. I mainly

Yup! I have an old Acer C710 with Gallium Linux installed. Opened the Chrome browser under Gallium Linux, enabled the experimental web thingy in chrome://flags, loaded the NanoVNA Web Client...then I

166 ?H is a pretty large inductor and likely has a pretty low self resonant frequency. Try 'de-Qing" the inductor by parallelling it with a 4.7 k to 10 k carbon resistor. If those work, increase the

entilleser via Groups.Io wrote: GalliumOS for the Chromebook isn't trying to run Android apps under ChromeOS. It's a full and fairly robust distribution of Linux which is either available as a boot

Here is an alternative. It may not be precise but can give you an idea of the loss. First you need to have access to the antenna end of the transmission line. 1. Fully calibrate the NANOVNA using your

I am in no way an expert, but if you connect your cable between CH0 and CH1, you will see the loss (or gain) at every frequency. You have to calibrate your VNA fully first .

Hello Rudi, I have made it. I can redo the measurement with the FA5, but as I told you, we tested it with the Rohode&Schwarz with calibrating and the results are comarable.