开云体育

I will add this as comment to the code -- NanoVNA Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home NanoVNA Files: /g/nanovna-users/files Erik, PD0EK

Searching ebay.co.uk has the same issue, no cases just nanovna units themselves. I made my own metal box, so not an issue for me. Maybe the vendors have placed a .com or regional listing condition on

Hi to all , I've solved the problem . The instrument-control pakage was installed. The mistake is that I was using the COM14 , that need a different sintax like hCom = nanoOpen("\\\\.\\COM14") instead

Hi Bob, It's interesting, and the translator translated it, I just had to put "space" in the right places. Still very understandable, thanks for the summary. 73, Gyula HA3HZ

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 08:57 PM, <bryburns@...> wrote: ,,, To clarify how to load the instrumentation library use the Octave command: "pkg load instrument-control" from the Octave command-line

To clarify how to load the instrumentation library use the Octave command: "pkg load instrument-control" from the Octave command-line prompt. But don't use the quote marks. -- Bryan, WA5VAH

I was tought early on that all things mechanical were considered FTF. That is file to fit... -- John Ferrell W8CCW

My message was gargled beyond recognition by whatever stupid software handled it.? <sigh> Bob

GIN&PEZ; I am very much familiar with the feeling of "cautious optimism", and I completely respect, appreciate, and support your careful scrutiny of the process details. I am looking forward to

@Gary O'Neil , N3GO - 17 December 2019 /g/nanovna-users/message/8292 Dear Gary, Thank you. Well, we are now proceeding carefully, step-by-step, by multi-checking and cross-verifying

GIN & PEZ; Congratulations on your success reported in Post 8255 (#82). Were the equations in posts 7272 (#78 twice corrected) & 7657 (#80) the ones used to perform your verification? -- 73 Gary, N3GO

I too have been enjoying the amazing capabilities of this little jewel.? I now find that I can measure most parameters of passive components and networks with excellent accuracy. I can

Hi Lajos How are calibration directly at the female adaptor of the VNA using the short and load standard only omitting the open standard ?? If you are using my female calibration setting with test

I recently updated my blog with two posts showing the measuement results I have obtained using a NanoVNA. one shows the response of a multiband HF antenna. The latest one shows the response of a step

Hi , many thanks I reinstalling the Octave , and I will check the version of the instrument control pakage. In my previus installation I've the 3.0 version. My nanovna is using COM14 , there is

Hi, From Kurt very good measurement with good calibrated s1p file used, I interpolate several point. Original data is 101 point. See the attachment, what's happening if I modify the points to 100,

Hi Ron, Thanks the reply, that could be the problem. Many clones exist, maybe my Hugen like (not know) device calibrators not same than others. I try use nanovna default 50fF C0 or data from Kurt

You need to load the instrumentation library I am running latest Octave on W10 -- NanoVNA Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home NanoVNA Files: /g/nanovna-users/files Erik,

Hi Erik , I tried to use the Octave code , but i'snt works. Wich version of Octave are you using , and wich OS. May be my version of Octave 5.1.0.0 on win7 is not supporting the serial function. any

Lajos, I'm NO expert on NanoVNAs, but I believe the difference you are seeing is due to 2 factors: 1. the total Over All Length of the 2 parts or 2. the different dilectric constant of the 2. ron N4UE