开云体育

edy555 decided to open source SW AND HW to avoid bad clones. -- NanoVNA Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home NanoVNA Files: /g/nanovna-users/files Erik, PD0EK

In view of the way this thing has took off,i imagine the developer is miffed about making it open source,would of thought there would have been a fair sum of money earnt if not.

While not fully compatible with LabView you can use GNU Octave (free) to very quickly create all kind of nice instrument control and computational applications. Octave has (almost?) all of the

While looking up the various versions of LabVIEW, I came across this webpage: https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/doku.php?id=get_labview&_ga=2.37744224.1746488316.1576035006-1670827954.1576035006 Where

With regard to historical references, while edy555 has not followed up on his original kit with a fully manufactured product he has remained at the forefront of the NanoVNA firmware evolution and also

My company has the full $3,000 version of LabView. However, there's a VERY INEXPENSIVE version available for "Home" use at $49 from Digilent: https://store.digilentinc.com/labview-home-bundle/ It is

That LabVIEW application was written by a gentleman over at eevblog and he is not releasing it to anyone. It runs on LabVIEW.? On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 4:18 PM, Hans , PA3HGT via

No kidding... I believe there is a student version that only breaks the bank. Base edition is 399$, full is over 3100$ and up... It is Labview a National Instruments product and its pretty nice tool

Hello PJH, thank you for asking about my involvement. My involvement is "only" software, yes. ;-) I have had some pokes at the firmware, but nothing published - it was these attempts (at increasing

It appears the software is National Labview- prepare to take out a mortgage. Dale W4OP

I believe LabView is a product of National Instruments. I hope I'm wrong in this case, but anything from National Instruments costs lost of green backs ($$$). Dave - W?LEV [email protected]> wrote:

Hello all, I saw on you tube the nice software for the NanoVNA : NanoVNA Labview : https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=DDvHN2v1gTg&feature=emb_title I am very curious to try it, is it

Thanks for your comments! Based on these I was able to verify this functionality. There are two issues: the bandwidth of a typical FM signal the low sensitivity if the Ch1 input With only 101 points

Patrick, Please browse the forum Wiki /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home edy555 is a Ham located in Japan and essentially took an existing idea from a couple of Texas Hams and developed

Gentlemen, As the editor I would like to write an article for the Tacoma Radio Club's newsletter including the history of the development of the NANO-VNA. I would like to include the names of the

Herb and Larry thanx both, all clear now, confirming what I thought and hoped that CAL->RESET doesn't clear the current contents of C0-C4 while "clearconfig 1234" does. Best regards and thanx again

I may stick it on ch0 and do some back to back like for like,ie with and without comparisons.

====================================== Size: 14 cm, 7.5 cm, 2 cm (length, width and height)

Great comments!? I add my "Whale Done" to them. I haven't begun to fathom the depths of the Nano, but I thank those who poured themselves into the design and manufacturing of it. I have had and used

I'm still trying to understand what you are publishing. Am I correct your model as published in the white on black picture is a one port model like this