开云体育

Eric; It might be helpful to review msg #6670. GIN&PEZ presents the derivation of the G-mini equation which is the one-port measurement model, which they summarize in msg #6798. That one port model,

Please have a look here: https://github.com/ttrftech/NanoVNA Quote: "Hardware design material is disclosed to prevent bad quality clone. Please let me know if you would have your own unit." -- NanoVNA

thats fair enough but why cant it be offered on an as is basis warts and all with no support,at least give others a chance to work with it!

I don't think your thoughts about a person's ego is of any relevance whatsoever to this mailing list. I understand that Joe does not have the time nor interest in supporting his software - and knowing

the guy who did that on youtube has a long thread on eevblogg,for some reason he wont release the s/w has been asked about releasing it a few times but always replys with what looks like b.s lame

That seems unlikely. On the contrary; the development to move it from 300MHz to 900MHz would likely not have happened, and the product would be a largely unknown hobby project - akin to what it was a

edy555 decided to open source SW AND HW to avoid bad clones. -- NanoVNA Wiki: /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home NanoVNA Files: /g/nanovna-users/files Erik, PD0EK

In view of the way this thing has took off,i imagine the developer is miffed about making it open source,would of thought there would have been a fair sum of money earnt if not.

While not fully compatible with LabView you can use GNU Octave (free) to very quickly create all kind of nice instrument control and computational applications. Octave has (almost?) all of the

While looking up the various versions of LabVIEW, I came across this webpage: https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/doku.php?id=get_labview&_ga=2.37744224.1746488316.1576035006-1670827954.1576035006 Where

With regard to historical references, while edy555 has not followed up on his original kit with a fully manufactured product he has remained at the forefront of the NanoVNA firmware evolution and also

My company has the full $3,000 version of LabView. However, there's a VERY INEXPENSIVE version available for "Home" use at $49 from Digilent: https://store.digilentinc.com/labview-home-bundle/ It is

That LabVIEW application was written by a gentleman over at eevblog and he is not releasing it to anyone. It runs on LabVIEW.? On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 4:18 PM, Hans , PA3HGT via

No kidding... I believe there is a student version that only breaks the bank. Base edition is 399$, full is over 3100$ and up... It is Labview a National Instruments product and its pretty nice tool

Hello PJH, thank you for asking about my involvement. My involvement is "only" software, yes. ;-) I have had some pokes at the firmware, but nothing published - it was these attempts (at increasing

It appears the software is National Labview- prepare to take out a mortgage. Dale W4OP

I believe LabView is a product of National Instruments. I hope I'm wrong in this case, but anything from National Instruments costs lost of green backs ($$$). Dave - W?LEV [email protected]> wrote:

Hello all, I saw on you tube the nice software for the NanoVNA : NanoVNA Labview : https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=DDvHN2v1gTg&feature=emb_title I am very curious to try it, is it

Thanks for your comments! Based on these I was able to verify this functionality. There are two issues: the bandwidth of a typical FM signal the low sensitivity if the Ch1 input With only 101 points

Patrick, Please browse the forum Wiki /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home edy555 is a Ham located in Japan and essentially took an existing idea from a couple of Texas Hams and developed