开云体育

Hello PJH, thank you for asking about my involvement. My involvement is "only" software, yes. ;-) I have had some pokes at the firmware, but nothing published - it was these attempts (at increasing

It appears the software is National Labview- prepare to take out a mortgage. Dale W4OP

I believe LabView is a product of National Instruments. I hope I'm wrong in this case, but anything from National Instruments costs lost of green backs ($$$). Dave - W?LEV [email protected]> wrote:

Hello all, I saw on you tube the nice software for the NanoVNA : NanoVNA Labview : https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=DDvHN2v1gTg&feature=emb_title I am very curious to try it, is it

Thanks for your comments! Based on these I was able to verify this functionality. There are two issues: the bandwidth of a typical FM signal the low sensitivity if the Ch1 input With only 101 points

Patrick, Please browse the forum Wiki /g/nanovna-users/wiki/home edy555 is a Ham located in Japan and essentially took an existing idea from a couple of Texas Hams and developed

Gentlemen, As the editor I would like to write an article for the Tacoma Radio Club's newsletter including the history of the development of the NANO-VNA. I would like to include the names of the

Herb and Larry thanx both, all clear now, confirming what I thought and hoped that CAL->RESET doesn't clear the current contents of C0-C4 while "clearconfig 1234" does. Best regards and thanx again

I may stick it on ch0 and do some back to back like for like,ie with and without comparisons.

====================================== Size: 14 cm, 7.5 cm, 2 cm (length, width and height)

Great comments!? I add my "Whale Done" to them. I haven't begun to fathom the depths of the Nano, but I thank those who poured themselves into the design and manufacturing of it. I have had and used

I'm still trying to understand what you are publishing. Am I correct your model as published in the white on black picture is a one port model like this

Would someone with the -F model give me the case dimensions? Thank you, Dale W4OP

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 06:19 AM, Howard Fidel wrote: There is no advantage. The 101 points are across the frequency range displayed.

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 05:20 AM, <nanovnauser@...> wrote: hi all,ive an old hp limiter from an old spectrum analyzer. Its a 5086-7282 0-1.8ghz, is it worth putting this on the input port of my

Read up on the various messages that talk about the reference plane. The limiter will limit when it is connected to the Nanovna but if you are performing antenna testing, if the Nano is floating, it

looking at it,as i right in thinking they provide an overlod path to ground?,ie shunt or thru/series,ie do i need to ground the body or will it do that via the sma conectors on it?

cheers larry,looks like it cant do any harm using it then,may save the vna front end incase of a cock up.

There is no advantage. The 101 points are across the frequency range displayed.

Spell checker smile of the day...... :-) This is a 10W limiter https://assets.testequity.com/te1/Documents/pdf/11867a.pdf is similar to yours, so I would suspect you could use it on CH1 without issue