¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi Rune, Many thanks again for your ongoing development of nanoVNA-Saver - fabulous work! I am not sure if I should waste your time reporting this as it is not a significant issue....just apple
By Tom VA7TA · #6916 ·
Re: Correction menu option ?
When trying to evaluate / improve upon firmware calibration by experiments with uncorrected data on hosts, e.g. /g/nanovna-users/message/6696
By Oristo · #6915 ·
Re: coax fatigue #test-jig
Thanks for doing the test Nick! I guess we are all having a great time working with this little unit. I was considering buying an 8753 and retrofitting it with an after-marked LCD display but I think
By WB2UAQ · #6914 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
I guess STM32CubeMX integration and STM support are main claims to fame for STM32CUBEIDE, which otherwise is another customization of ECLIPSE?/CDT IDE. NanoVNA uses ChibiOS, which has a dedicated
By Oristo · #6913 ·
Re: errors of "error" models
[ann] next-to-come : on the measurement of s-parameters using the [LeastVNA] only
By gin&pez@arg · #6912 ·
Re: Correction menu option ?
Why would you want to ever disable this?
By Joe St. Clair AF5MH · #6911 ·
Re: [nanovna-f] NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
An excellent piece of software just got better. Congratulations and thanks for your efforts !73 de YO4AUL
By Corneliu · #6910 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
This is a little off topic however I reply to the question on firmware development enviroment. I am using the free STM32CUBEIDE from ST Micro the Mc manufacture to build some SDR control code for a
By William Heller · #6909 ·
Re: Metal enlosure vs stability #enclosure #stability #shielding #calibration
Golden rule of reducing uncertainty, use the connector type that you will be using to connect directly to the equipment / antenna that you test. Otherwise, I'd need more adapters to connect to a
By Andy <punkbiscuit@...> · #6908 ·
Re: Metal enlosure vs stability #enclosure #stability #shielding #calibration
yes, UHF connectors have terrible performance even on HF
By QRP RX · #6907 ·
Re: Metal enlosure vs stability #enclosure #stability #shielding #calibration
Ugg. You used UHF connectors. They are not very good impedance above HF..... You should use N style connectors.
By Harold Farrenkopf · #6906 ·
Re: coax fatigue #test-jig
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 02:35 PM, Nick wrote: > In the attached picture the isolated plot is green and the connected plot is > red.
By Nick · #6905 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi Vaclav, for NanoVNA-Saver I use PyCharm - which is Python specific, and not usable for the firmware development side of things. On Windows, I might choose something like Visual Studio Code with a
By Rune Broberg · #6904 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Rune, since I now know that you are an actual coder / developer , I like to ask / give a feedback if as "not recently experienced person" is allowed. 1. What is your development tool ? ( In few words
By vaclav_sal <vaclav_sal@...> · #6903 ·
Re: coax fatigue #test-jig
Thank you Pete and Dana for your helpful replies. I connected the two supplied SMA cables to the nvna and calibrated from 10kHz to 1500MHz. With both ends terminated in 50 Ohms the nvna cannot measure
By Nick · #6902 ·
Re: [nanovna-f] NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
From our Wiki, /g/nanovna-users/wiki /g/nanovna-users/message/5421
By Oristo · #6901 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi, a drag function is definitely on the list for a future version! Thanks for the feedback! -- Rune / 5Q5R
By Rune Broberg · #6900 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Perhaps a way to drag/move that zoomed in display would be great, it seems to at times just move out of view when zoomed in.
By robnj74@... · #6899 ·
Re: [nanovna-f] NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
I don¡¯t suppose Mac versions of the software are possible. Ray
By Ray W8LYJ · #6898 ·
NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Earlier today I released NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0: https://github.com/mihtjel/nanovna-saver/releases/latest Release notes: New feature: Zooming This release adds the ability to "zoom" on the
By Rune Broberg · #6896 ·