Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi Rune, Many thanks again for your ongoing development of nanoVNA-Saver - fabulous work! I am not sure if I should waste your time reporting this as it is not a significant issue....just apple
By
Tom VA7TA
·
#6916
·
|
Re: Correction menu option ?
When trying to evaluate / improve upon firmware calibration by experiments with uncorrected data on hosts, e.g. /g/nanovna-users/message/6696
By
Oristo
·
#6915
·
|
Re: coax fatigue
#test-jig
Thanks for doing the test Nick! I guess we are all having a great time working with this little unit. I was considering buying an 8753 and retrofitting it with an after-marked LCD display but I think
By
WB2UAQ
·
#6914
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
I guess STM32CubeMX integration and STM support are main claims to fame for STM32CUBEIDE, which otherwise is another customization of ECLIPSE?/CDT IDE. NanoVNA uses ChibiOS, which has a dedicated
By
Oristo
·
#6913
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
[ann] next-to-come : on the measurement of s-parameters using the [LeastVNA] only
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#6912
·
|
Re: Correction menu option ?
Why would you want to ever disable this?
By
Joe St. Clair AF5MH
·
#6911
·
|
Re: [nanovna-f] NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
An excellent piece of software just got better. Congratulations and thanks for your efforts !73 de YO4AUL
By
Corneliu
·
#6910
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
This is a little off topic however I reply to the question on firmware development enviroment. I am using the free STM32CUBEIDE from ST Micro the Mc manufacture to build some SDR control code for a
By
William Heller
·
#6909
·
|
Re: Metal enlosure vs stability
#enclosure
#stability
#shielding
#calibration
Golden rule of reducing uncertainty, use the connector type that you will be using to connect directly to the equipment / antenna that you test. Otherwise, I'd need more adapters to connect to a
By
Andy <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#6908
·
|
Re: Metal enlosure vs stability
#enclosure
#stability
#shielding
#calibration
yes, UHF connectors have terrible performance even on HF
By
QRP RX
·
#6907
·
|
Re: Metal enlosure vs stability
#enclosure
#stability
#shielding
#calibration
Ugg. You used UHF connectors. They are not very good impedance above HF..... You should use N style connectors.
By
Harold Farrenkopf
·
#6906
·
|
Re: coax fatigue
#test-jig
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 02:35 PM, Nick wrote: > In the attached picture the isolated plot is green and the connected plot is > red.
By
Nick
·
#6905
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi Vaclav, for NanoVNA-Saver I use PyCharm - which is Python specific, and not usable for the firmware development side of things. On Windows, I might choose something like Visual Studio Code with a
By
Rune Broberg
·
#6904
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Rune, since I now know that you are an actual coder / developer , I like to ask / give a feedback if as "not recently experienced person" is allowed. 1. What is your development tool ? ( In few words
By
vaclav_sal <vaclav_sal@...>
·
#6903
·
|
Re: coax fatigue
#test-jig
Thank you Pete and Dana for your helpful replies. I connected the two supplied SMA cables to the nvna and calibrated from 10kHz to 1500MHz. With both ends terminated in 50 Ohms the nvna cannot measure
By
Nick
·
#6902
·
|
Re: [nanovna-f] NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
From our Wiki, /g/nanovna-users/wiki /g/nanovna-users/message/5421
By
Oristo
·
#6901
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi, a drag function is definitely on the list for a future version! Thanks for the feedback! -- Rune / 5Q5R
By
Rune Broberg
·
#6900
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Perhaps a way to drag/move that zoomed in display would be great, it seems to at times just move out of view when zoomed in.
By
robnj74@...
·
#6899
·
|
Re: [nanovna-f] NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
I don¡¯t suppose Mac versions of the software are possible. Ray
By
Ray W8LYJ
·
#6898
·
|
NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Earlier today I released NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0: https://github.com/mihtjel/nanovna-saver/releases/latest Release notes: New feature: Zooming This release adds the ability to "zoom" on the
By
Rune Broberg
·
#6896
·
|