Re: errors of "error" models
Thank you GIN & PEZ -- 73 Gary, N3GO
By
Gary O'Neil
·
#6533
·
|
Re: VBAT resistor voltage divider, polynomial fitting, VBAT sampling
it's not clear what you're expecting and what is wrong... Could your please explain? In general I see some issues with divider: 1) Two 20 k resistors leads to 40k continuous load on the battery. So,
By
QRP RX
·
#6532
·
|
VBAT resistor voltage divider, polynomial fitting, VBAT sampling
I used resistors to make a voltage divider, and tied the 20K across D2 and the 100K from D2- to C47 gnd. In the attached image, currents with VBATEN on and off show 60 and 35 uA, respectively. One
By
Rich NE1EE
·
#6531
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
Rune, I'm still hoping someone can help me understand the new TDR impedance measurement display ( see message /g/nanovna-users/message/6520 ). One other thing in regards to the TDR
By
hwalker
·
#6530
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
#73': On the sine qua non Core Uncertainty of AnyVNA - incl. NanoVNA - System (the message #73 is withdrawn mainly because its conclusion is too weak) erik@... - 5 November 2019 :
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#6529
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hi Rudi Understood, thank you. UPS about the R&S TR-Check have you tried to run in W95 compatibility mode and as administrator ? Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra:
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#6528
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
Hi Sam, you're welcome :-) I have considered interpolation; but my original idea for the software was to allow more data points to avoid interpolation, and instead provide better data resolution. For
By
Rune Broberg
·
#6527
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
Rune, Thanks for the new version. Has anyone given any thought to using interpolation to display the data between the measurement points when in line mode? Sometimes more often than not there isn't a
By
Sam Reaves
·
#6526
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2
hello, there is also the opensource project: https://hforsten.com/improved-homemade-vna.html 30mhz up to 6ghz, the project is around 300 euros. I'm not saying to make it the same but it can be a
By
Gufo Rosso
·
#6525
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Kurt, Yes I know that the curve is not so very good. But it was just a priciple test for the procedure chain: NanoVNA-saver .S2P file save to a T-Check curve with minimal effort, with free
By
Rudi
·
#6524
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hi Erik Thank you for the spreadsheet I did mistakenly comment your T-Check to Reuters and did right away see the mistake I imported your s2p file after modification of the header, as a surplus S at
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#6523
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hi Reuter I had to modify your header to import the s2p file. There was a S too much ! ListType=Lin (This addition was probably not needed) # HZ S RI R 50 (at the end of this line there was a S too
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#6522
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
#73 : erik@... - 5 November 2019 : /g/nanovna-users/message/6495 Dear Erik, Thank you very much indeed for your interest in our work and also for the chance you give us to explain it
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#6521
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
Hope someone can give me some insight on the TDR impedance measurement display. I have attached TDR impedance displays for two cable assemblies. The first cable assembly was made up of a 0.3m length
By
hwalker
·
#6520
·
|
Re: Your NanoVNA version
Thank you, that is usefull information for everyone! I haven't decided what to do. I might fix my nanoVNA, buy another or wait for the announced "nanoVNA 2.0". My version isn't completely dead but the
By
necessaryevil86@...
·
#6519
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Eventually, but getting something built first in a "friendly" IDE, then whittling to fit, might be faster. Also, with Bluetooth, local display becomes highly optional.
By
Oristo
·
#6518
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Erik, Now it works, see the attached diagram: NanoVNA_T-Check.png Thanks again for the very good spreadsheet. 73, Rudi DL5FA
By
Rudi
·
#6517
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Actually, read the whole thread, including /g/nanovna-users/message/1795 With all the features stuffed into the current firmware, builds are starting to overflow storage. You'll need
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6516
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
/g/nanovna-users/message/1508
By
Oristo
·
#6515
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Oops, just found this article: https://wonderfulengineering.com/10-best-bluetooth-modules-for-arduino/ .. which recommends HC-06: "use it simply for a serial port replacement" ~ US$1.40
By
Oristo
·
#6514
·
|