Re: errors of "error" models
#73 : erik@... - 5 November 2019 : /g/nanovna-users/message/6495 Dear Erik, Thank you very much indeed for your interest in our work and also for the chance you give us to explain it
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#6521
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
Hope someone can give me some insight on the TDR impedance measurement display. I have attached TDR impedance displays for two cable assemblies. The first cable assembly was made up of a 0.3m length
By
hwalker
·
#6520
·
|
Re: Your NanoVNA version
Thank you, that is usefull information for everyone! I haven't decided what to do. I might fix my nanoVNA, buy another or wait for the announced "nanoVNA 2.0". My version isn't completely dead but the
By
necessaryevil86@...
·
#6519
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Eventually, but getting something built first in a "friendly" IDE, then whittling to fit, might be faster. Also, with Bluetooth, local display becomes highly optional.
By
Oristo
·
#6518
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Erik, Now it works, see the attached diagram: NanoVNA_T-Check.png Thanks again for the very good spreadsheet. 73, Rudi DL5FA
By
Rudi
·
#6517
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Actually, read the whole thread, including /g/nanovna-users/message/1795 With all the features stuffed into the current firmware, builds are starting to overflow storage. You'll need
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6516
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
/g/nanovna-users/message/1508
By
Oristo
·
#6515
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Oops, just found this article: https://wonderfulengineering.com/10-best-bluetooth-modules-for-arduino/ .. which recommends HC-06: "use it simply for a serial port replacement" ~ US$1.40
By
Oristo
·
#6514
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
I mean to rip the BT module out of the device... Also, I just had a quick look at the pin mapping of the F072 as used in the NanoVNA.? PINS 30 & 31 (not currently used) can be remapped to USART1_TX &
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6513
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Erik, Thank you very much for your provided spread sheet. At the moment I am still fighting with the decimal point/comma topic :-( 73, Rudi DL5FA
By
Rudi
·
#6512
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
I do not find hacks turning ELM327 into BT bridge; cheap HC-05 has good Arduino support, https://components101.com/wireless/hc-05-bluetooth-module but wants substantial code. A "smart" BT LE shield is
By
Oristo
·
#6511
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Yes, but SPI to USB host would be simpler than trying to add Bluetooth to nanoVNA firmware https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01EWW9R1E
By
Oristo
·
#6510
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Actually, I was thinking a little more on what uses a serial to BT bridge: every one of those really cheap OBD2 BT car diagnostic readers has one built-in. Those readers cost $5 and up so the BT
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6509
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Oristo, All Vaclav needs to do is use one of the unused serial ports on the chip and use a BT to serial module. I was looking at the F072 specs and it appears the serial pin I was thinking if using is
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6508
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
Hi Vaclav - Unless you find a Bluetooth dongle that supports USB OTG, I think that this is doomed. I found no 64-pin STM32 chip, as in nanoVNAs, that does USB OTG,
By
Oristo
·
#6507
·
|
Re: Now What
Herb, thanks very much. I assume the two devices are different enough that the manual for the smaller one will not be of help. I almost purchased the smaller one but thought why not get the larger
By
Andrew Baer, M.D. <ambaer52@...>
·
#6506
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Attached spreadsheet contains the formula and you can paste your s2p file on the input tab -- Erik, PD0EK
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#6505
·
|
NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
This is sort of "bump" / dupe. Or more direct approach. Take your pick. This is NOT post for / to users of NanoVNA, This post is about NanoVNA operating / embedded software hacking. I am planning to
By
vaclav_sal <vaclav_sal@...>
·
#6504
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.5
A quick note, for those running from the Python source: "scipy" is required for the TDR impedance measurement display, and you therefore need to install this, for example by re-running the "pip
By
Rune Broberg
·
#6503
·
|
Re: T-Check for my nanoVNA - Results look excellent below 150 MHz and acceptable up to 300 MHz
Hello Bryan, I am trying to calculate the T-Check value from the NanoVNA-Saver .S2P file with LibreOffice Calc, but I did not got the T-Check formular adopted. This is already done in the attached
By
Rudi
·
#6502
·
|