Re: Any ideas for test jigs?
I have been using a fixed L and a fixed C on 3.5 and 10 MHz. Works very well in getting a quick check of calibration. Mel, K6KBE
By
Mel Farrer, K6KBE <farrermesa@...>
·
#5101
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
#52 : Update : The compact SLO formula for [AnyVNA] - after /g/nanovna-users/message/5081 - 17 October 2019 /g/nanovna-users/message/5075 - 17 October 2019 by Gary
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#5100
·
|
Re: Any ideas for test jigs?
Perhaps calibrating nanoVNA THRU using an RF Active Probe, e.g. https://www.ebay.com/itm/332393676082
By
Oristo
·
#5099
·
|
Re: NanoVNA WebApp USB question
Hugen, If I order a NanoVNA-H today will it have the 5.1k Type-C CC resistors installed? What is the link to your Nan0VNA-H site? If someone does not have a NanoVNA with the resistors does this
By
Mike N2MS
·
#5098
·
|
Re: Owen Duffy on improvised test fixtures
#test-jig
Hi Perhaps the caption should have been "nanovna-saver ¨C a premature look". I mean it is of version 0.1.0. I took a different approach than writing a blog entry, or webpage, about it, namely to
By
Bo, OZ2M
·
#5097
·
|
Re: Test fixtures
#test-jig
Wow - you have a lot of time to look up all of these posts!Are you going to put all this in the application notes section of the wiki? Enhancing nanoVNA by an eBay 3GHz RF bridge is interesting.
By
Larry Rothman
·
#5096
·
|
Re: Test fixtures
#test-jig
Enhancing nanoVNA by an eBay 3GHz RF bridge is interesting. Before getting nanoVNA, I considered using SDR and noise source with http://transverters-store.com/rf_bridge/rf_bridge.html eBay clone
By
Oristo
·
#5095
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.3
Hi Rune , very happy for the new improvement on the 0.1.3 of nanovna-saver. Suggestions for the future version : 1 Save the settings of nanovna , start stop center number segments , sweep mode , when
By
Maurizio IZ1MDJ
·
#5094
·
|
Re: Abbreviated documentation for more simplistic tasks?
Citing in messages helpful specific URLs applicable to nanoVNA (and why) has value.
By
Oristo
·
#5093
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.3
Hi Rune, I still can't find my old paper notes on the subject of Cs, Cp, Ls and Lp but this Keysight document seems to be the closest to what I was looking for. Section 1 of this document
By
Martin
·
#5092
·
|
Re: Owen Duffy on improvised test fixtures
#test-jig
Because in my experience he is usually correct in what he says, and his blog postings lead to greater understanding of various subjects, mainly due to him challenging what others may take for granted,
By
Martin
·
#5091
·
|
Re: NanoVNA WebApp USB question
A dedicated USB attachment, stripped of display, battery, and switches would be nicely light weight and efficient
By
Oristo
·
#5090
·
|
Re: Owen Duffy on improvised test fixtures
#test-jig
The question is, why would anyone care what Mr. Duffy has to say?
By
Bilbo
·
#5089
·
|
Re: Any ideas for test jigs?
Yes I thought that something like that would happen. If I put a tuned circuit on the collector/drain and match it to 50 ohms, it will not tell the true Hfe. Perhaps a 500 ohms reactance would work in
By
Leif M
·
#5088
·
|
Owen Duffy on improvised test fixtures
#test-jig
While Mr. Duffy was rather unkind to both the NanoVNA and Mr. Broberg, he does have an interesting blog. Here he talks about improvised test jigs https://owenduffy.net/blog/?p=15710 Jim, KA6TPR
By
Starsekr
·
#5087
·
|
Re: NanoVNA WebApp USB question
Some people said that you can solder anything you see, so get a magnifying glass. I dont beliewe that is always true but maybe you can. Leave coffee out for a while and try. I can just use 0603 with
By
Leif M
·
#5086
·
|
Re: NanoVNA V2 - I vote for a larger instrument...
From: necessaryevil86@... What I want is a slightly larger display, a 3.2" or a 3.5" is not that much more expensive... But I also know: the most dangerous thing in the world beside a programmer
By
David J Taylor
·
#5085
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.3
Hi Rune, I have a suggestion. If one tries to adjust a homebrew filter of any kind it would be very helpful to see the result of the adjustment at least for S21 and S11 simultaneously on one plot. In
By
Norbert Kohns
·
#5084
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.3
Hi Gary, I am aware of the scaling issues. It occurs primarily (only?) when values grow "quite large" or "quite small", and thus can't fit in the assigned fields. I haven't made the fields fixed size,
By
Rune Broberg
·
#5083
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.1.3
Hi I see the resizing too. Reported to Rune. The problem, as I see it, is that the panes with the marker numbers are auto sized/not fixed in size. Bo
By
Bo, OZ2M
·
#5082
·
|