Re: This seller looks iffy selling nanoVNA's
Hi S Johnson, bear in mind that there are multiple parties doing research and dev work; edy555 who made the original NanoVNA, hugen who made the version that got copied widely, and even the teams
By
Rune Broberg
·
#4838
·
|
Re: This seller looks iffy selling nanoVNA's
Why would anyone buy any other than from Hugen? Support the one doing the research and dev work.
By
Steve Johnson
·
#4837
·
|
Re: This seller looks iffy selling nanoVNA's
All I know is that the tracking number given to me for China post is invalid. EBay says the label has been created, but certainly nothing has moved. I am 99.99% sure that the $22 one I bought will
By
Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...>
·
#4836
·
|
Re: Yet another NanoVNA PC app
Well, I believe there is already a mobile app available for the NanoVNA? Having a mobile version would be fine, and I'm not doing anything to actively prevent it - ;-) - but I'm also not spending time
By
Rune Broberg
·
#4835
·
|
Re: Firmware upgrade - Touchscreen not working
I've done that multiple times. I've loaded DMR's special touchscreen test firmware(#4778). Same results. It's not the firmware. I've got a touchscreen that has become defective. Thanks anyway.
By
Andy Yates <andyfranyates@...>
·
#4834
·
|
Re: Can the NanoVNA be used on 75-ohm antennas/cables?
the world of r.f. energy transfer... form of current or in the form of e.m.f., the "push" on the energy, the voltage. (
By
John Nightingale
·
#4833
·
|
firmware update - smt device in dfu mode driver
Hi I just got a nanovna and I am trying to updagrade firmware from Aug 2nd to the latest in a W10 machine. I boot up in dfu mode with the 2 pins shorted and white screen W10 device manager shows smt32
By
Angel M0HDF
·
#4832
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
#43 : On the Phase @Gary O'Neil : Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 04:45 PM /g/nanovna-users/message/4194 Dear Gary, We thank you very much, indeed, for this particular comment: "More precisely,
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#4831
·
|
Re: Yet another NanoVNA PC app
Hi Rune - Any consideration of mobile (iOS / Android) versions? QT5 and Python are both supported on both, after a fashion... Imagining that nanoVNA evolution forks, a low-end Bluetooth dongle
By
Oristo
·
#4830
·
|
Re: Finally I found out how to order a NanoVNA-H
This is the unpacked picture, D2 is already installed, and the USB TypeC CC resistor is also installed. Thanks to Maggie for making a beautiful gift box for NanoVNA-H. Thru Adaptor is currently not
By
Hugen
·
#4829
·
|
Re: Can the NanoVNA be used on 75-ohm antennas/cables?
That's not true. If you have X not equals to zero, it means that load returns back RF energy. And it means that you have higher loss in the cable. The thing that you're talking about is that coax
By
QRP RX
·
#4828
·
|
Re: Improving performance between 900MHz and 1.5GHz
I thought I gave all the info required to do the calculation. The source is on github. What else do you need?
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#4827
·
|
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
KE8CPD, Can you confirm that when you power up your NanoVNA that you see a battery icon, and that the CONFIG => VERSION menu shows 0,2.3. Just to confirm the upgrade is taking. - Herb
By
hwalker
·
#4826
·
|
Re: This seller looks iffy selling nanoVNA's
Someone said these $17 NanoVNAs are probably factory rejects (hopefully only for a cosmetic blemish, e.g. a silk-screening error).
By
W5DXP <w5dxp@...>
·
#4825
·
|
Re: Can the NanoVNA be used on 75-ohm antennas/cables?
television,...no. areas in signal so about anything will serve as an adequate antenna. Just look at those rubbish "magic" all channel antennas that are peddled by hard sell artists and that appear in
By
John Nightingale
·
#4824
·
|
Re: Improving performance between 900MHz and 1.5GHz
Hi OK, but from the table I can't see the feedback multisynth divider ratio. Indeed above 150 MHz the output multisynth divider ratio is fixed at 4 per Si5351A datasheet. Bo
By
Bo, OZ2M
·
#4823
·
|
Re: Can the NanoVNA be used on 75-ohm antennas/cables?
Jim, according to the AC (RF) maximum power transfer theorem, you get maximum power transfer when the load impedance is *conjugately* matched. Luckily, coax with a Z0 of 50+j0 ohms is a trivial
By
W5DXP <w5dxp@...>
·
#4822
·
|
Re: reference plane
Ken, You hit the nail on the head. At low frequencies, at VHF and down, I wouldn't worry about picosecond delays or femto-farad fringing C's. And I bet 99% of the Nano users will be looking at SWR
By
WB2UAQ
·
#4821
·
|
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
KE8CPD, The group firmware repository below might be your best bet for locating the old firmware. Try the hugen or edy555 folders.
By
hwalker
·
#4820
·
|
Re: Possible Issue with ttrftech firmware (0.2.3-11) above 300 mhz
Going from your picture, it looks like the calibration didn't "take". In your picture of 50k-900M span, 50k-300M looks right, and the rest just looks weird. So I would expect it to be that you need to
By
Rune Broberg
·
#4819
·
|