开云体育

i would use a newer v2 (saa2n or v2plus4) .. or a litevna64 dg9bfc sigi Am 04.05.2025 um 17:23 schrieb ae1th@... via groups.io:

I use a micro SD card to save calibration settings. Jon VU2JO <bill.french.epsom@...> wrote:

Stan, You described to Torbjorn how to toggle a Remote switch in NanoVNAapp Is it possible that you can make a screendump of the pop-up screenshot which is showed after clicking on the camera icon in

I'll second Dave's recommendation. The least expensive option. If you must go above 900MHz your costs go way up for the higher end models. I'm very happy with my H4 Matthew KD6KVH

Forgot to mention that I have the H4 version and I am very happy with it. Terry W7AMI

Most hams are happy with the -H4. Dave - W?LEV <bill.french.epsom@...> wrote: -- *Dave - W?LE

If you are going to be doing outdoor work, I strongly recommend the H4 with it's 4" screen. It is extremely difficult to distinguish between a slash zero and an 8 in bright light. Also, the H4 shows

if not going above 900 mhz , get the nano h4, get from randl electronics, it will NOT be a clone.

Make certain that you are buying a genuine nanoVNA and not a knockoff. The list of approved vendors can be found here... https://nanovna.com/?page_id=121 NanoVNA.com is the place to go to about your

I bought a NanoVNA-H v3.6 recently and I am happy with it. I use it mainly for antenna tuning. Here is my little 'NanoVNA for Antenna Tuning: A Beginner's Guide': https://youtu.be/qb38VI-9tV0 Other

Looking at the number of different versions available on Amazon, I'm confused. Although not an abnormal state for me, I try to keep it to a minimum. Can the group make some recommendations for a

Reading the sticker at the backside of two NanoVNa units I see a difference. One is HW version 4.2 and the other is HW 4.3_MS I have understood that the additional _MS refers to the MS5351M (message

Hi Peter. I limited the number of traces to two because that's the minimum number that allows comparison for optimization. I didn't think about your application, which is more documentation. To do

Hello Brian, I've been following the evolution of your Smith chart plotting and am pleased you've been able to add the feature to your plotting package. As a user of Smith charts in both RF design and

Correct Brian. It is a clever engineering concatenation of the two descriptions for Y and Z COMBINED... Good stuff!

Alan, when I first read this I thought it was a typo for admittance. I learned this morning that it means impedance or admittance. I have been using Y + Z for lack of a better term. The next version

Hi Hugen Thanks Pse did you mean slightly better below 100Khz or below 100Mhz ? 73s Nizar

Thank you for your information. Kees, PE0CWK Op 30-4-2025 om 04:05 schreef Hugen via groups.io:

Hello, after NXP discontinued the SA602A we designed a compatible chip for the continued production of the NanoVNA. This chip has a slightly lower noise figure, but also a slightly lower IIP3. I

If my memory serves me correctly the major difference between the ne and se version had to do with the temperature range they were spec'd over. wrote: