¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: NanoVNA V2 - I vote for a larger instrument...
Hello If the list owner could open a poll, already a tool in groups.io, I will be happy to vote for my v.2 preferences. Bo
By Bo, OZ2M · #3456 ·
Re: NanoVNA bricked
Robert, The thanks actually go to the great user groups that have formed around the nanoVNA. I never understood why people are so enthusiastic about some open source projects until now. This group is
By hwalker · #3455 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2 - I vote for a larger instrument...
Once again, I vote for a larger version. As I said earlier, I would like one to be tablet size and with Type-N connectors. I suspect that I'd probably be willing to pay a fair price for a larger, more
By Burt K6OQK · #3454 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
Here is an S2P file from RFSim99. It doesn't load. Error: "2019-09-29 23:11:04,575 - NanoVNASaver.Touchstone - WARNING - Read line without having read header: 15.000000 1.000 -153.501 0.000 -63.501
By Bo, OZ2M · #3453 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
Hi Bo, if the firmware starts supporting changing the fundamental/harmonic changeover point, I'll definitely have that in the software as well :-) The Elsie format doesn't look much like a file
By Rune Broberg · #3452 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
Hi Bo VNWA can do it, import anything ? Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af Bo, OZ2M Sendt: 29. september 2019
By Kurt Poulsen · #3451 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
Hello Rune Firmware info. OK. Then just an idea for future F/W. Max freq. see here: /g/nanovna-users/topic/si5351a_max_fundamental/34315096 This will require the firmware to have this
By Bo, OZ2M · #3450 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
I think it depends what you define as ¡°small . To me at least, a Keysight FieldFox is just about acceptable for carrying and for use with antennas. That¡¯s approximately 292 x 187 x 71 mm and
By Dr. David Kirkby from Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...> · #3449 ·
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Hi David One detail if I may. It is not possible to use the R&S T-Check software it requires the NanoVNA are able to do a full 10/12term error correction.. Sorry Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig
By Kurt Poulsen · #3448 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
Hi W5DXP, I'm glad to hear you got it working. I don't know what I can do to make Kaspersky like the software more. (Put in fewer viruses, I joked earlier?) This particular piece of software doesn't
By Rune Broberg · #3447 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
Hi Bo, the software does query the firmware info, and outputs it to the console. There isn't a sufficiently standardized reporting of capabilities that it's really useful for the software, though. I'm
By Rune Broberg · #3446 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2 own build with the results
Congratulations, Eric
By FRANCISCO JAVIER MURIEDAS ARGUMOSA · #3445 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
Hello If I was to measure a 23 cm antenna, let alone one for 13 cm or 9 cm, I would NEVER EVER place an object the size of the NanoVAN at or close to the antenna. Thus size is not important. In a
By Bo, OZ2M · #3444 ·
Re: NanoVNA bricked
I had great difficulty flashing in DFU mode. At one point I thought the VNA was bricked. For whatever reasons, I was unable get DFU running under Linux. Under Windows, it finally worked but took
By Robert Mattaliano · #3443 ·
Re: Cal-Kit Standards' Definitions
Hi Jeff I have given a report I made on the last day of 2017 a brush-up which you can download from http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/How to design a homemade male BNC calibration kit.pdf It is a full blown
By Kurt Poulsen · #3442 ·
Re: nanovna Battery Specifications
Dr. Dave I already noted that you cannot see the -60 dB point on a filter in through mode with a dynamic range of 40 dB. And I already noted that 99% of the time I personally do not need to see the 60
By Warren Allgyer · #3441 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
In my opinion, it could be a bit larger with a larger screen and still be fine for portable or field use.? Just look at the Keysight Field Fox... Mike WY6K "... somewhere in the distance, there's a
By WY6K Mike Watts · #3440 ·
Re: Si5351A max fundamental frequency
It's somewhat different, does not really matter Till 300MHz both test signal and 5kHz offset LO are fundamentals. From 300 to 900MHz test signal is 3rd harmonics so actually from 100 to 300MHz and the
By Erik Kaashoek · #3439 ·
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
More ideas. If possible query the firmware name and version. When, if, possible set the max fundamental frequency. Possibility to load Elsie data. The problem right now is that Elsie doesn't export
By Bo, OZ2M · #3438 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
..... and eliminate all of that self promotion? Highly unlikely I think. WA8TOD
By Warren Allgyer · #3437 ·