开云体育

Thank you very much, Roger. Best regards and have a nice day, Stefan On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 04:44 AM, Stefan Dimitrov wrote: You need to use Device manager to see if a COM port is active for your

And of course, the software should remember where it was when it was stopped, so that it would start from there next time.

After some use I noticed a couple things which could be better in NanoVNASaver.win.x64 software. First, I posted this also to /g/NanoVNAV2 but after a couple of days it has not

Maybe because nobody bothered to try? <grin> Sometimes, I find the derivative of unwrapped phase (group delay) more useful, too.

I have a 40m 144' horizontal loop also at about 20'. It is a right triangle. The pointy end is due east and is a little lower. I feed it with BalunDesigns 1:1 balun and then about 55 feet of 450-ohm

I like my SAA-2N, it is the one I generally reach for in the shack. It works fine with external programs or standalone, updates work fine, and I like the type N connectors, as my shack is mostly type

I don't see much mention of the SAA-2N v2.2 Does everyone recommend the H4 over the SAA-2N? The price difference is not of concern I am more concerned about functionality and support. Brian W1BKW

What ever you buy, I'd recommend using its "official shop". There are links on the homepage.

I would strongly recommend buying from R&L Electronics. You won't get a clone from them!! Here is the link to them for the NANOVNA-H4:

Nanovna-H4 is a great basic vna, if you don't need multiple GHz frequencies. It runs the latest firmware and is actively supported. And you should be able to get one for less than $100

Hi Jim. Thanks for the reply. The answer is simple. Convenient! A pair of trees are there, about 100 feet apart and between them, nothing. No balun used. The ends of the dipole are away from each tree

Have you checked the homepage(s). Like https://nanorfe.com/ and https://nanorfe.com/nanovna-versions.html I can recommend V2 Plus4 Pro V2.4, it costs 299$ plus 18650 battery. But today I would try to

Hello Alan Did you start with some ideal calculated length for 7.05 MHz, set the dipole at 7 feet high and then trim the length for best return loss? Or perhaps put up precut wire for a higher

I know this is old but thank you so much for posting that link about the larger screen job. That guy did an amazing job and it was enjoyable to scroll through Good day !

I am doing something wrong. I uploaded bin file of memory to my computer (NanoVNA.H.v1.1.00FromVanoVNA.bin). If I compare what I saved to my computer to memory, I get a match. I then downlodaed from

NanoVNA-H4 NanoVNA v2 Plus4 Istvaan

Hi Stan and others, Thanks for the reply. Based upon my photos from earlier in the thread does a negative offset delay seem reasonable. It doesn't to me, but my experience is limited. Best, Chris

Hi, I like to replace my first edition NanoVNA with a newer, read better one. Can you advise me a good model that runs with the Nanovna-saver program and does not break the bank? 73' Ron ON2RON

Normally you try to calibrate at the reference plane where you want to take the measurements, and the delay is set to 0. The e-delay is a method of adjusting the position of the reference plane before

Hello Robin. Thanks for the response. The F-F adapter 15mm long. It was replaced with about 50mm of transmission line in the form of a female SMA with 50 ohm coax cable. My question is about using a