开云体育

Hi Alan, one of the features of NanoVNA-Saver - the prime one, really, from my point of view - is the ability to sweep many more than 101 points. I think I've used it up to 20200 points at one time,

Hi George (and others), the .exe for NanoVNA-Saver is built on Windows 7 - on a virtual machine that's used for nothing else. It has the build tools installed, but otherwise is just a (fully updated)

Hello, Allow us, please, to point out that: The notion of error bounds (in the plural, since they are two -implicitly, but definitely real numbers, which are the two estimated| |computed real numbers,

ps... For the record, I value Dave K's content. He seems a decent chap and I'd buy him a drink anytime. I just don't quite like the presentation of the messages in a hobbyist forum. I don't go

Hello Yza; I admire and appreciate your persistence, as well your desire to stay on topic. I suspect this discussion is far above most on this list... myself included. There may be a few whose

Hello, Allow us, please, to inform the interested reader and/or contributor that we shall copy -"just in case"- sometime later, all of our messages from here to out there:

One other note Rune. And others can comment in if I am off base. After thinking about this a bit more, there may be an issue in obtaining GD and what is known as differential group delay accurately

We had the same problem here... works with Win10 but not Win7. Not sure if this is the cause of your problem. We found that Win7 did not have latest Framework 4.0. Many software developers assume that

Others here agree with Michael. That includes myself, others who have posted on this forum as well as personal feedback that I have personally received. The ridiculous self aggrandizement takes the

Folks, I have just uploaded an updated Console Command document to the Files section. It now references Erik's last build 0.1.1 with TDR and battery. However, there are a few items that I am not sure

08:06 Wed 25 Sep 19 , Steve London wrote: I faced the same problem and I've modified a bit smith chart presentation to show R+jX. I think my patch will not apply to current fw but if you want to try

Hello, Allow us, please, to inform the interested reader and/or contributor that in order to we stay on- and continue on this subject, we had to copy our messages from this topic to that one: [errors

With totally different software (National Fire Information Reporting System), installing on Windows 7 you need to ignore the default install location and go direct to the C: drive. With the default

drkirkby@...> wrote: The T-check theory assumes that the T is lossless. -- Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd, drkirkby@... https://www.kirkbymicrowave.co.uk/

What do you connect on the the third port of the T? Most people connect 50 ohm loads, but personally I am skeptical of the logic of that, as it means both ports see a constant 25 ohms. BNC calibration

Could someone repeat my tests? I have described the issue here: https://github.com/ttrftech/NanoVNA/issues/45 Carlos

XENOMORPH, who I believe first introduced the 1500 MHz, tdr, and battery icon firmware mod, has just released a firmware mod that adds additional 256 point FFT capabilities versus the current 128

Yeah, I thought that would do it as well, BUT it gives reflection coefficient. Alan

Hi Steve, Others have asked for this as well. And I think as far as I know, the short answer is NO. Unless there is a plan to update the firmware to do that calculation and provide a touch key to

Did you try polar output?