开云体育

I suggest the ADF5355 also but it is much more expensive than the ADF4351 (especially if you need two of them)... https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/ADF5355.pdf About

Indeed, thanks

If you want a really big screen you can easily build on yourself using very similar HW and some ebay modules. Two ADF4351 generators, a resistive bridge and some AIM81001 mixers dead bug style on a

Kurt, Allow me to share my T-check excel spreadsheet. Copy your 2 port touchstone data into the yellow cells and the graph will show the deviations Hope I did not make a mistake in the calculations.

Hello Erik, Thank you for adding your extension to the Hugen nanoVNA version 0.1.1. It would be nice to fill out in the "version window" the version number, e.g.: 0.1.1 + scan, 1500MHz It can be done

Hi David I got permission from R&S to publish their T-Check software http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/T-Check.zip and http://www.hamcom.dk/VNWA/T-Check_HD_Install.zip But that was in 2012 and now you just in

Hello, Mr. Kirkby, would it be possible to reduce your unnecessary lines to the essentials? It would increase the readability of your inflated messages...

Instead of the AD8342 I would suggest the type IAM81008 in the mixer stages. It is specified up to 5 GHz and has an easily solderable package. Wolfgang DH1AKF

Wow. What after that - a NanoVNA VNA version 3 with 4 receivers supporting unknown thru calibration? In all seriousness, I feel the biggest problem with the NanoVNA is the size of the screen. Dave --

On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 21:04, alan victor <avictor73@...> wrote: > Hello Reg, > > I brought up this question of uncertainty in measurements several posts > ago. Although the calculation is not

I think that the adf4351 would be better: Main improvements compared to the ADF4350: * Improved 1/f in-band phase noise (5 dB) * EVM improvement of up to 30% * Lower PFD spurs * Wider output range: 35

Very kind of you to offer Kurt. I was an EMC project manager up until I retired, so I know how pressing deadlines are. I have time now-a-days to follow my whims and will mock up a few test set-ups on

I think this promises to be a very interesting thread. I spent my career solving wave equation problems. In my case, elastic rather than electromagnetic, the impedance is pure real. But the change to

I gleaned the following information from one of the other nanoVNA user groups regarding nanoVNA version 2. 1. The nanoVNA will eventually reach 3GHz (and at a similar price to version 1). 2. It's

Hello, We just uploaded the currently available version of /F/L/O/S/S/ FORTRAN code: https://www.op4.eu/code/DW20190924.7z Check the functionality of the program, please, by using the included text

Hi Herb I did notice you already had mentioned part 2 and 3 "plowing" thru the next messages. Well I need to have a relatively low profile as I am in the midst of a huge project so only limited time.

Thanks for the heads up Kurt. I linked to parts 2 & 3 in a subsequent reply. I found the whole series of articles to be interesting reading and hope to construct a similar Test fixture for sorting my

Hello, We both thank you very much all of you for your most valuable comments ! We gladly feel that we find a sound ground for a fruitful discussion, as we hope. Well, we don't mean to offend you but,

Did you check it with the new nanoVNA-F? Its general parameters seem to be better by 10dB.

the smartphone solution NanoVNA -webclient would be the solution https://cho45.stfuawsc.com/NanoVNA/ but for me i get the nice graphs and possible saving of S1P etc but connection with nao fails. I