Re: |S11| > 1
Brian, As a reference point, when calibrated, the HP 8753D has a linear magnitude reflection uncertainty of 0.015 or so when the reflection magnitude is near 1. I am not sure if that means the
By
John Gord
·
#28459
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
Settings: 401 points, 0.1-50 MHz, bandwidth 100 Hz, arithmetic 4X smoothing, power = 4 mA Brian
By
Brian Beezley
·
#28458
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
Measurement of a short at the VNA connector after clearing cal: 49002000 -0.869956992 0.080768176 49126750 -0.869913280 0.080994536 49251500 -0.869870784 0.081221216 49376250 -0.869828352 0.081447216
By
Brian Beezley
·
#28457
·
|
NanoVNA for RFID design
I'm sure that at least a few here are familiar with the following section from the STMicro application note "AN4974: Antenna matching for ST25R3911B/ST25R391x devices", since it calls for the use of a
By
tjackson382000
·
#28456
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
That's "total power" or 1E-4 on I and 1E-4 on Q (so 1.4E-4 on absolute voltage)?
By
Jim Lux
·
#28455
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
Jim, I can assure you our STEM students know nothing about significant figures! Terry (Dr. Terry Bullett) and I have tried, but no knowledge of the concept. They are Juniors going into their senior
By
W0LEV
·
#28454
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
On 4k IFBW as i can see H4 measure error (due to noise) on 100-200MHz near ~1e-4 (on linear trace) On 100Hz IFBW, near 1e-5
By
DiSlord
·
#28453
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
On 6/14/22 9:24 AM, W0LEV wrote: > Thank you, Jim!!! > > Again, we are not running a metrology lab nor do our measurements approach > those of HP, R&S, Tek, and others. Something my PhD friends tell
By
Jim Lux
·
#28452
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
Thank you, Jim!!! Again, we are not running a metrology lab nor do our measurements approach those of HP, R&S, Tek, and others. Something my PhD friends tell me is that error analysis and assignment
By
W0LEV
·
#28451
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
Thanks for the reply, DiSlord. I'll check with Rudy, but I believe he calibrated at the VNA SMA immediately before the measurement since normally he never measures without a cable.. Brian
By
Brian Beezley
·
#28450
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
what would be interesting is to measure it without calibration, and with, and make sure there's not some mis calibration going on somehow.
By
Jim Lux
·
#28449
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
I've asked Rudy to remeasure the short and open using MA (magnitude/angle) mode. That might shed some light on where the inaccuracy lies. Also, I think he was using averaging. It might be interesting
By
Brian Beezley
·
#28448
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
I think need recalibrate. Calibration must remove all errors.
By
DiSlord
·
#28447
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
Interesting - I wonder if it's a "round off" or truncation error of some sort.? The "detector" mixes with I/Q 5 kHz, summing, and there could
By
Jim Lux
·
#28446
·
|
Re: New to NanoVNA - HAM wanting to play w. antennas
#edy555_nanovna
Carsten, my experience is all antennas, even those off the shelf one, need some finetuning. 1. Tuning - I would recommend the minimal height for tuning purposes is 3-4m over the ground at the end of
By
igor-m
·
#28445
·
|
Re: Using a nanoVNA as a passive receiver
I tried this just last week. It seems work like a spectrum analyzer but having doubts about calibration. For this purpose I used Satsagen software and my HackRF One. -- ALVARO, EA8ARX
By
?lvaro Felipe Hern¨¢ndez
·
#28444
·
|
Re: |S11| > 1
15070000 -1.000470519 -0.000045675 15194750 -1.000452399 -0.000081647 15319500 -1.000464559 -0.000072501 15444250 -1.000433683 -0.000034980 15569000 -1.000416160 -0.000060047 15693750 -1.000486493
By
Brian Beezley
·
#28443
·
|
Re: New to NanoVNA - HAM wanting to play w. antennas
#edy555_nanovna
By
Richard Spohn
·
#28442
·
|
Re: New to NanoVNA - HAM wanting to play w. antennas
#edy555_nanovna
@igor-m The summerhouse is in Sweden (900m2 Lot) , near Halmstad (outskirt of city). There can be both thunder & high winds (30m/s, when ugly) I was thinking of hammering 2 x 3M groundrods down , and
By
Carsten F (OZ1FTG)
·
#28441
·
|
Re: New to NanoVNA - HAM wanting to play w. antennas
#edy555_nanovna
@Carsten: Lightning and Static: in the EFHW antenna with the transformer the antenna wire itself is grounded through the secondary and the coax via primary windings (a short for static). Your system
By
igor-m
·
#28440
·
|