Re: Saver 0.4.x, startup reconfigures -H4
Didn't work for me, per email nVNA-H4 v4.3_MS, firmware 1.1 , Saver 0.4.0, and your mod Yep. That
By
Rich NE1EE
·
#28089
·
|
Re: Saver 0.4.x, startup reconfigures -H4
Not fond of "inconsistencies" here...but I see the point you make... Problem for me is what I described in my email...the out-of-sync nature of the Manage dialog and its unpredictable (to me)
By
Rich NE1EE
·
#28088
·
|
Re: SMA connector mating cycles
As long as there are no unwanted SMA connectors, I don't want to stick my nose in their personal affairs. ;-) ~R~ 72/73 de Rich NE1EE The Dusty Key On the banks of the Piscataqua
By
Rich NE1EE
·
#28087
·
|
New to flashing firmware.
..and looking to orient myself. Have a NanoVNA H as well as a NanoVNA H4 but this query is about the "H" only. I flashed the firmware with a DiSlord clone (v1.1.01 (Build Dec 30 2021) after having
By
k6whp
·
#28086
·
|
Re: Saver 0.4.x, startup reconfigures -H4
I replied to your post on this issue a few days ago but you did not reply. Did you see my post? /g/nanovna-users/topic/91082901#28066 Roger
By
Roger Need
·
#28085
·
|
Re: Saver 0.4.x, startup reconfigures -H4
Saver defaults to 101 points to maintain compatibility with older NanoVNA devices. I just go into Manage and set it to 401 points. Seems to work fine for me. What version of H4 firmware are you using?
By
Roger Need
·
#28084
·
|
Re: Saver 0.4.x, startup reconfigures -H4
Yes, saver has some bugs. In particular I have noted some inconsistencies when trying to set it for 401 pts on the H4 (it works better if I let it use 201 or 101 pts and then let Saver control
By
Stan Dye
·
#28083
·
|
Erratic touch screen
Hi I have this hardware on this attached photo. All seems running as expected except for the touchescreen , it's arratic . i tryed to calibrate it , test function still showing erratic behavior and
By
Team-SIM SIM-Mode
·
#28082
·
|
Re: Saver 0.4.x, startup reconfigures -H4
Maybe it's not the way to go for your use case. Have you tried editing the .ini file? >
By
Jim Lux
·
#28081
·
|
Saver 0.4.x, startup reconfigures -H4
That's just wrong. Every time it connects, it reset the H4 to what someone else thinks it should be. The user should be the one to determine that. I even changed the Manage settings to agree with my
By
Rich NE1EE
·
#28080
·
|
Re: SMA connector mating cycles
+1
By
Rich NE1EE
·
#28079
·
|
Re: SMA connector mating cycles
clean socket AND plug!! dg9bfc sigi Am 15.05.2022 um 16:51 schrieb Zack Widup:
By
Siegfried Jackstien
·
#28078
·
|
Re: SMA connector mating cycles
I use a Q-tip dipped in alcohol to remove the particles that accumulate inside a female SMA connector. As for deformity in the center conductor, I don't think there's much you can do for that. Zack
By
Zack Widup
·
#28077
·
|
Re: SMA connector mating cycles
Electrical tape as a 'condom'. Put them in separate places could control mating. -- KT0TT Allen Kiddoo
By
A Kiddoo <kt0tt.ham@...>
·
#28076
·
|
Re: H4, Saver 0.4.0 e-delay
I did download, and will use it on my next tests. Thanks also for the writeup. It is very useful to keep in mind when using Saver. I think that I must start and connect nVNA to PC start Saver
By
Rich NE1EE
·
#28075
·
|
Re: Saver 0.4.0 suggestion
The initial releases of NanoVNA Saver were developed by Rune B. Broberg for the NanoVNA-H and nanoVNA-H4. Unfortunately he became ill and development stopped at version 2. Further development of V3
By
Roger Need
·
#28074
·
|
Re: H4, Saver 0.4.0 e-delay
Rich, From your reference links it looks like the "offset delay" should be entered as a positive number representing the one way delay through the port extension. I have modified my fork of NanoVNA
By
Roger Need
·
#28073
·
|
Re: SMA connector mating cycles
yes ... a short male to female adaptor is a good advice to keep the built-in connectors in good shape ... if worn out just replace :-) i use a similar thing on my rf explorer (also sma connector)
By
Siegfried Jackstien
·
#28072
·
|
Re: H4, Saver 0.4.0 e-delay
Please take all of the following bearing in mind that I am a VNA novice...it is nice to have this perspective on the table. I intend to search the forum for the threads mentioned... I actually don't
By
Rich NE1EE
·
#28071
·
|
Re: H4, Saver 0.4.0 e-delay
When the author of NanoVNA saver implemented "offset delay" it was discussed in this group. The consensus was that it should be in accordance with the standard definitions used for calibration kit
By
Roger Need
·
#28070
·
|