开云体育

No, on My firmware you can work from 800Hz (but not need calibrate from 800Hz to 1500MHz, this not good) Problem can be from old config settings

Thanks, I ran a calibration and saved to all 4 locations as you recommended and it is responding properly. Could it be I entered bad data by setting the start frequency at 10kHz instead of 50kHz? I an

For recall need only use RECALL->RECALL 0 or RECALL->RECALL 1 and e.t.c if device hang on recall - possibly problem in bad data on it, try reset config and clear settings (use console and run

I have a NanoVNA and an H4 model with the DiSlord 1/0/45 version, build Dec 15 2020. I am starting to lad configurations into the various recall groups. I have the same issue with both units. - Enter

The Low-Z measurements. The way to do that is using S21 measurement and short? CH0 to CH1. Then switch the low-Z impedance parallel to that. Ofcourse calbration is necessary for Z=infinite and Z=0,

I just loaded Hugen's mod of Dislord 1.0.45 and it looks nice on an H. 73 -Jim NU0H "Gyula Molnar" <gyula.ha3hz@...> wrote:

Arie, I would like to see your experiments with low impedances. Mike N2MS

Hi Roger and all, This one attracted my attention. Thanks for the nice graphs and foto's Roger. Love your test-jig. About 4months ago I wrote an article about measuring high impedances with the nano.

Hi w3wtw, Several solutions are possible. The easiest is to wear glasses. Last year, when development was in its infancy, there was firmware that used larger letters. Then during development, it was

Dear Gyula, thanks for the goal-oriented hint ... now everything works fine!! Best 73s de DL6RDE, Charlie -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Im

Hi Charlie, I think there is only a shortcoming in the use of the program. When you want to measure something and have already drawn the graph, you can make the measurement data visible with the

Hi, new user so thanks for your patience. Calibrated and confirmed appropriate procedure per reference videos. Did a wide sweep, and then resonant sweeps for two different triband antennas and found:

hugen has recently released a version of DiSlord's v1.0.45, with larger font, for H & H4 (with a few other changes too): https://github.com/hugen79/NanoVNA-H/releases/tag/1.0.45 Not sure if this

Is there a capability to control the tone used in the sweep or CW? Iv been using it as a tone generator, but I'd like to be able to control the tone freq and level. Thanks a ton, John

Roger: I very much like the S11 phase vs impedance phase chart you did up for us. This sure makes the difference easy to understand :-) Following along... -- VE6WGM

I am happy with where this thread has gone. The information is excellent and clearly laid out, and did not digress into anarchy and mayhem :-) Thank you Roger (and others). If anyone observes any

This next post is about measuring inductors and self-resonance. I have an old multi-layer choke in my junk box and I measured it with the NanoVNA. My goal is to post some graphs of the results and

Hi Roger et al, Ooooppppssss .... I think I blindly stepped into something .... or 'stepped onto' something ... :) I guess it is going to take me awhile to understand that issue .... and the shape of

Roger- Your latest message very clearly described the differences between a reflection coefficient phase angle and the phase angle associated with a complex impedance. Sounds like most of the recent

You are using an ancient version, see if it is the same with the recent one. karlheinz.merscher@...> wrote: