¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: Pro or Con
I concur with what Dave sez, plus the freq range is seamless & you can connect it to a droid and/or windblows PC. I do suggest using a pair of SMA connector savers. I have some that are push-on,
By GEO BADGER · #13432 ·
Re: Test fixture question
I calculated a minimum loss resistor network, reducing the 2 x 14.8 dB from the HP fixture to 2 x 11.4 dB. Please see at https://www.rudiswiki.de/wiki9/nanoVNA#Crystal_measurement Attached are 2
By Rudi · #13431 ·
Re: Protective Case
Why don't you pay half a beer to the OP of this topic?
By CT2FZI · #13430 ·
Re: Protective Case
You will see them. It's just a matter of time.
By Jim Allyn - N7JA · #13429 ·
Re: Pro or Con
Thank you Dave.? I have gotten great answers and enough courage to decide.? Just clicked the purchase the NanoVna H4.? I am really looking forward to having it on this next antenna project. Thanks
By Dan Gilliam <k5khz@...> · #13428 ·
Re: Pro or Con
The MFJ's 1) do not cover the frequency range of the NANO's 2) do not offer the measurement accuracy of the NANO's 3) do not have the frequency accuracy of the NANO's 4) do not have the diversified
By W0LEV · #13427 ·
Re: Protective Case
Didn't see any for the H4 version. ?___ Sent from my two way wrist watch 73 de W3AB/GEO?
By GEO BADGER · #13426 ·
Re: Protective Case
Bummer. Thanks. ?___ Sent from my two way wrist watch 73 de W3AB/GEO?
By GEO BADGER · #13425 ·
Re: Protective Case
Unfortunately not for the H4 version. @GEO BADGER, check post 1 of this topic.
By CT2FZI · #13424 ·
Re: Pro or Con
Dan, here's my 0.02 worth RE nanoVNA versus antenna analyzers: One is an open source "vector network analyzer" that is continually open to updates and fixes and experimentation. It requires close
By Ed Humphries · #13423 ·
Re: Protective Case
Thingverse has a few
By Larry Rothman · #13422 ·
Re: Protective Case
I guess I missed this thread. Who/where can the case for the h4 be purchased or the 3d STL files downloaded.? ---? Ciao baby, catch you on the flip side?? 73 de W3AB/GEO ??? http://www.w3ab.org
By GEO BADGER · #13421 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
It may assist in a high RF field environment. ?___ Sent from my two way wrist watch 73 de W3AB/GEO?
By GEO BADGER · #13420 ·
Re: Test fixture question
Hola Jos¨¦, The crystal parameters can be calculated as explained in the PHSNA User's Guide Appendix I, by Nick Kennedy WA5BDU. All formulas are there. It can be downloaded from here:
By EB4APL · #13419 ·
Re: Protective Case
I am impressed.? I have never touched a 3D printer, or seen one in action.? Do you sell the cases? Please share what printer you use.? I might consider getting one.? I am always monkeying around
By Dan Gilliam <k5khz@...> · #13418 ·
Re: Protective Case
Hello, I purchased your case design to encorage you for the future :) I also designed an addon if you want to use your unit just as an antenna/cable analyzer, while still using your cover. Or remove
By CT2FZI · #13417 ·
Re: Pro or Con
I agree with Marco on his analysis. I do lots of outdoor work and wanted something with a more substantial case so I purchased a NanoVNA-F with the push button switches instead of the rocker switch.
By Mike N2MS · #13416 ·
Re: Pro or Con
Thanks Marco.? Great insight, Dr. Dan S. Gilliam, Sr.Ham Call: K5KHZDMR ID: 1151012k5khz@yahoo434-210-8380434-210-8383 Cell
By Dan Gilliam <k5khz@...> · #13415 ·
Re: Pro or Con
Hi Dan. This is just my opinion. I like the nanovna because I can give it a frequency range and see where the antenna is resonant at, instantly. With the MFJ-2XX, i had to tune around to find that
By M Garza <mgarza896@...> · #13414 ·
Re: NanoVNA V2
Will a metal case affect measurement accuracy
By aleks07111971@... · #13413 ·